Water stress and hybridization between Quercus gambelii and Quercus grisea

Western North American Naturalist

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 498-507

  Swenson, Nathan G ^a,b,c   Fair, Jeanne M ^b   Heikoop, Jeff ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c The University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional traits; GIS; Hybrid zone; Range boundaries; Specific leaf area; Stable isotopes

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS; QUERCUS GAMBELII; QUERCUS GRISEA;

EID: 58149500685     PISSN: 15270904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3398/1527-0904-68.4.498     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AGUILAR, F.M., AND W.J. BOECKLEN. 1992. Patterns of herbivory in the Quercus grisea x Quercus gambelii species complex. Oikos 64:498-504.
2. ANDERSON, E. 1948. Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2:1-9.
3. -. 1949. Introgressive hybridization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
4. BARTON, N.H., AND G.M. HEWITT. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16:113-148.
5. BRUGNOLI, E., K.T. HUBICK, AND S. VON CAEMMERER. 1988. Correlation between the carbon isotope discrimination in leaf starch and sugars of C3 plants and the ratio of intercellular and atmospheric partial pressures of carbon dioxide. Plant Physiology 88:1418-1424.
6. BUERKLE, C.A., R.J. MORRIS, M.A. ASMUSSEN, AND L.H. RIESEBERG. 2000. The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation. Heredity 84:441-451.
7. BURGER, W.C. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24:45-50.
8. CAMPBELL, D.R., C. GALEN, AND C.A. WU. 2005. Ecophysiology of first and second generation hybrids in a natural plant hybrid zone. Oecologia 144:214-225.
9. CHEVAN, A., AND M. SUTHERLAND. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning. American Statistician 45:90-96.
10. CICERO, C. 2004. Barriers to sympatry between avian sibling species (Paridae: Baeolophus) in local secondary contact. Evolution 58:1573-1587.
11. DAWSON, T.E., S. MAMBELLI, A.H. PLAMBOECK, P.H. TEMPLER, AND K.P. TU. 2002. Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:507-559.
12. DELPH, L.F., M.H. JOHANNSSON, AND A.G. STEPHENSON. 1997. How environmental factors affect pollen performance: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ecology 78:1632-1639.
13. DICKSON, R.E., AND P.T. TOMLINSON. 1996. Oak growth, development and carbon metabolism in response to water stress. Annals of Forest Science 53:181-196.
14. DOBZHANSKY, T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
15. EHLERINGER, J.R., AND T.A. COOPER. 1988. Correlations between carbon isotope ratio and microhabitat in desert plants. Oecologia 76:562-566.
16. EHLERINGER, J.R., A.E. HALL, AND G.D. FARQUHAR. 1993. Stable isotopes and plant carbon-water relations. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.
17. ENDLER, J.A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
18. [ESRI] ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. 1999. Arc-View. Version 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA.
19. FARQUHAR, G.D., M.H. O'LEARY, AND J.A. BERRY. 1982. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11:539-552.
20. FISCHER, D.G., S.C. HART, T.G. WHITHAM, G.D. MARTINSEN, AND P. KEIM. 2004. Ecosystem implications of genetic variation in water-use of a dominant riparian tree. Oecologia 139:288-297.
21. FREEMAN, D.C., E.D. MCARTHUR, K.T. HARPER, AND A.C. BLAUER. 1981. Influence of environment on the floral sex ratio of monoecious plants. Evolution 35:194-197.
22. HOWARD, D.J., R.W. PRESZLER, J. WILLIAMS, S. FENCHEL, AND W.J. BOECKLEN. 1997. How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51:747-755.
23. JOHNSTON, J.A., R.A. WESSELINCH, A.C. BOUCK, L.A. DONOVAN, AND M.L. ARNOLD. 2001. Intimately linked or hardly speaking? The relationship between genotype and environmental gradients in a Louisiana Iris hybrid zone. Molecular Ecology 10:673-681.
24. KOHLMANN, B., H. NIX, AND D.D. SHAW. 1988. Environmental predictions and distributional limits of chromosomal taxa in the Australian grasshopper Caledia captiva (F.). Oecologia 75:483-493.
25. LUDWIG, F., D.M. ROSENTHAL, J.A. JOHNSTON, N. KANE, B.L. GROSS, C. LEXER, S.A. DUDLEY, L.H. RIESEBERG, AND L.A. DONOVAN. 2004. Selection on leaf ecophysiological traits in a desert hybrid Helianthus species and early-generation hybrids. Evolution 58:2682-2692.
26. MAYR, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. MOORE, W.S. 1977. An evaluation of narrow hybrid zones in vertebrates. Quarterly Review of Biology 52:263-277.
28. OBERHAUSER, K., AND A.T. PETERSON. 2003. Modeling current and future potential wintering distributions of eastern North American monarch butterflies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:14063-14068.
29. PETERSON, A.T., AND K.P. COHOON. 1999. Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic completeness. Ecological Modelling 117:159-164.
30. RAND, D.M., AND R.G. HARRISON. 1989, Ecological genetics of a mosaic hybrid zone: mitrochondrial, nuclear, and reproductive differentiation of crickets by soil type. Evolution 43:432-439.
31. REMINGTON, C.L. 1968. Suture-zones of hybrid interaction between recently joined biotas. Pages 321-428 in T. Dobzhanski, M.K. Hecht, and W.C. Steere, editors, Evolutionary biology. Plenum Press, New York.
32. RIESEBERG, L.H., M.A. ARCHER, AND R.K. WAYNE. 1999. Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83:363-372.
33. RIESEBERG, L.H., O. RAYMOND, D.M. ROSENTHAL, Z. LAI, K. LIVINGSTON, T. NAKAZATO, J.L. DURPHY, A.E. SCHWARZBACH, L.A. DONOVAN, AND C. LEXER. 2003. Major ecological transitions facilitated by hybridization. Science 301:1211-1216.
34. SAINI, H.S. 1997. Effects of water stress on male gametophyte development in plants. Sexual Plant Reproduction 10:67-73.
35. STEBBINS, G.L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
36. STOCKWELL, D.R.B., AND I.R. NOBEL. 1992. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data, a robust and informative method of data analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 32:249-254.
37. SWENSON, N.G. 2006. GIS-based niche models reveal unifying climatic mechanisms that maintain the location of avian hybrid zone locations in a North American suture zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:717-725.
38. -. 2008. The past and present influence of geographic information systems on hybrid zone, phylogeographic and speciation research. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21:421-434.
39. TUCKER, J.M. 1961. Studies in the Quercus nudulata complex. I. A preliminary statement. American Journal of Botany 48:202-208.
40. WEIH, M. 2001. Evidence for increased sensitivity to nutrient and water stress in a fast-growing hybrid willow compared to a natural willow clone. Tree Physiology 21:1141-1148.
41. WILLIAMS, D.G. AND J.R. EHLERINGER. 2000. Carbon isotope discrimination and water relations of oak hybrid populations in southwestern Utah. Western North American Naturalist 60:121-129.
42. WILLIAMS, J.H., W.J. BOECKLEN, AND D.J. HOWARD. 2001. Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridization. Heredity 87:680-690.