A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Northeast India

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-27

  Das, Sandip ^a   Gupta, Ishwer D ^b   Gupta, Vinay K ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

^b CENTRAL WATER AND POWER RESEARCH STATION   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; TECTONICS;

ATTENUATION MODEL; EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; GROUND MOTION; INDIA; PSEUDO-SPECTRAL VELOCITY; SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS; SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

SEISMOLOGY;

ACCELERATION; EARTHQUAKE CATALOGUE; EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER; GROUND MOTION; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; LOW VELOCITY ZONE; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMICITY; SEISMOTECTONICS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TREND ANALYSIS;

INDIA;

EID: 33645907832     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.2163914     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson, J. G., and Trifunac, M. D., 1977. On Uniform Risk Functionals Which Describe Strong Earthquake Ground Motion: Definition, Numerical Estimation, and an Application to the Fourier Amplitude of Acceleration, Report CE 77-02, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
2. Anderson, J. G., and Trifunac, M. D., 1978. Uniform risk functionals for characterization of strong earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 68, 205-218.
3. Bapat, A., Kulkarni, R. C., and Guha, S. K., 1983. Catalogue of Earthquakes in India and Neighbourhood from Historical Period up to 1979, Indian Society of Earthquake Technology, Roorkee, India.
4. Basu, S., and Nigam, N. C., 1978. On seismic zoning map of India, Proceedings, VI Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, India, Vol. I, pp. 83-90.
5. Bernreuter, D. L., Savy, J. B., Mensing, R. W., and Chen, J. C., 1989. Seismic Hazard Characterization of 69 Nuclear Power Plant Sites East of the Rocky Mountains, NUREG/CR-5250, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
6. Bhatia, S. C., Ravikumar, M., and Gupta, H. K., 1999. A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions, Annali Di Geofisica 42 (6), 1153-1164.
7. Chandrasekaran, A. R., and Das, J. D., 1993. Strong Earthquake Ground Motion Data in EQINFOS for India: Part 1B, Univ. of Roorkee and Univ. of Southern California, Dept. of Civil Eng., Report No. CE93-04, edited by M. D. Trifunac, M. I. Todorovska, and V. W. Lee.
8. Cornell, C. A., 1968. Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58, 1583-1606.
9. Douglas, J., 2001. A Comprehensive Worldwide Summary of Strong-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Ordinates (1969 to 2000), ESEE Report No. 01-1, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Civil Eng. Dept., London, U.K.
10. Douglas, J., 2002. Errata of and addition to ESEE Report No. 01-1.
11. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), 1986. Seismic Hazard Methodology for the Central and Eastern United States, Report NP-4726, Palo Alto, CA.
12. Frankel, A., 1995. Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States, Seismol. Res. Lett. 66 (4), 8-21.
13. Gupta, I. D., 2002. Should normalised spectral shapes be used for estimating site-specific design ground motion? Proceedings, 12th Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Roorkee, Vol. I, pp. 168-175.
14. Gutenberg, B., and Richter, C. F., 1944. Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 34, 185-188.
15. Joyner, W. B., and Boore, D. M., 1981. Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71 (6), 2011-2038.
16. Kaila, K. L., and Rao, N. M., 1979. Seismic zoning maps of Indian subcontinent, Geophys. Res. Bull. 17, 293-301, National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.
17. Khattri, K. N., Rogers, A. M., and Algermissen, S. T., 1984. A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas, Tectonophysics 108, 93-134.
18. Lee, V. W., 1992. On strong motion risk functionals computed from general probability distributions of earthquake recurrence, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 11, 357-367.
19. Lee, V. W., 2002. Empirical scaling of strong earthquake ground motion - Part I: Attenuation and scaling of response spectra, ISET J. Earthquake Technol. 11 (4), 219-254.
20. Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D., 1979. Automatic Digitization and Processing of Strong Motion Accelerograms, Report No. CE79-15 I and II, Univ. of Southern California, Dept. of Civil Eng., Los Angeles, CA.
21. Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D., 1987. Microzonation of a Metropolitan Area, Report No. CE87-02, Univ. of Southern California, Dept. of Civil Eng., Los Angeles, CA.
22. McGarr, A., 1984. Scaling of ground motion parameters, state of stress, and focal depth, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6969-6979.
23. Orozova, I. M., and Suhadolc, P., 1999. A deterministic-probabilistic approach for seismic hazard assessment, Tectonophysics 312, 191-202.
24. Peruzza, L., Slejko, D., and Bragato, P. L., 2000. The Umbria-Marche case: Some suggestions for the Italian seismic zonation, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 20, 361-371.
25. Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC), 1997. Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts, NUREG/CR-6372, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
26. Stepp, J. C., 1973. Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget Sound area, in Seismic Zoning, edited by S. T. Harding, Report ERL 267-ESL30, NOAA Tech, Boulder, Co.
27. Todorovska, M. I., 1994. Comparison of response spectrum amplitudes from earthquakes with lognormally and exponentially distributed return period, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 13 (2), 97-116.
28. Todorovska, M. I., Gupta, I. D., Gupta, V. K., Lee, V. W., and Trifunac, M. D., 1995. Selected Topics in Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Report No. CE95-08, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
29. Trifunac, M. D., 1971. Zero base-line correction of strong-motion accelerograms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 61 (5), 1201-1211.
30. Trifunac, M. D., 1972. A note on correction of strong-motion accelerograms for instrument response, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 62 (1), 401-409.
31. Trifunac, M. D., 1980. Effects of site geology on amplitudes of strong motion, Proceedings, 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 2, pp. 145-152.
32. Trifunac, M. D., 1990. A microzonation method based on uniform risk spectra, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 9 (1), 34-43.
33. Trifunac, M. D., 1992. Should peak acceleration be used to scale design spectrum amplitude? Proceedings, 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, Vol. 10, pp. 5817-5822.
34. Trifunac, M. D., and Lee, V. W., 1989. Empirical models for scaling pseudo relative velocity spectra of strong earthquake accelerations in terms of magnitude, distance, site intensity and recording site conditions, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 8 (3), 126-144.
35. Trifunac, M. D., and Lee, V. W., 1990. Frequency-dependent attenuation of strong earthquake ground motion, Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 9 (1), 3-15.
36. Veneziano, D., Cornell, C. A., and O'Hara, T., 1984. Historic Method for Seismic Hazard Analysis, Report NP-3438, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
37. Verma, R. K., Mukhopadhyay, M., and Ahluwalia, M. S., 1976. Seismicity, gravity, and tectonics of Northeast India and Northern Burma, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 66 (5), 1683-1694.
38. Wahlström, R., and Grünthal, G., 2001. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (horizontal PGA) for Fennoscandia using the logic tree approach for regionalization and nonregionalization models, Seismol. Res. Lett. 72 (1), 33-45.
39. Weichert, D. H., 1980. Estimation of earthquake recurrence parameters for unequal observational periods for different magnitudes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70, 1337-1346.
40. Wheeler, R. L., and Mueller, C. S., 2001. Central U.S. earthquake catalog for hazard maps of Memphis, Tennessee, Eng. Geol. 62, 19-29.
41. Woo, G., 1996. Kernel estimation methods for seismic hazard area source modeling, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 86, 353-362.