Suitability of Rapid Aneuploidy Detection for Prenatal Diagnosis

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 781-787

  Sparkes, Rebecca L ^a   Bernier, Francois P ^a   Chernos, Judy E ^a   Johnson, Jo Ann M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Chromosome aberrations; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Genetic screening; Polymerase chain reaction; Prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMNIOCENTESIS; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS DISEASE; FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; KARYOTYPING; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAPID ANEUPLOIDY DETECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; ANEUPLOIDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AMNIOCENTESIS; ANEUPLOIDY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 58149401469     PISSN: 17012163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32942-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Sparkes R., Johnson J., Langlois S. New molecular techniques for the prenatal detection of chromosomal aneuploidy. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline No. 210, July 2008. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008, 30:617-620.
2. Mann K., Fox S.P., Abbs S.J., Yau S.C., Scriven P.N., Docherty Z., et al. Development and implementation of a new rapid aneuploidy diagnostic service within the UK National Health Service and implications for the future of prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 2001, 358(9287):1057-1061.
3. Schmidt W., Jenderny J., Hecher K., Hackeloer B.J., Kerber S., Kochhan L., et al. Detection of aneuploidy in chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 by QF-PCR in 662 selected pregnancies at risk. Mol Hum Reprod 2000, 6(9):855-860.
4. Mansfield E.S. Diagnosis of Down syndrome and other aneuploidies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and small tandem repeat polymorphisms. Hum Mol Genet 1993, 2(1):43-50.
5. Cirigliano V., Ejarque M., Canadas M.P., Lloveras E., Plaja A., Perez M.M., et al. Clinical application of multiplex quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) for the rapid prenatal detection of common chromosome aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 2001, 7(10):1001-1006.
6. Cirigliano V., Ejarque M., Fuster C., Adinolfi M. X chromosome dosage by quantitative fluorescent PCR and rapid prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod 2002, 8(11):1042-1045.
7. Gerdes T., Kirchhoff M., Lind A.M., Larsen G.V., Schwartz M., Lundsteen C. Computer-assisted prenatal aneuploidy screening for chromosome 13, 18, 21, X and Y based on multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Eur J Hum Genet 2005, 13(2):171-175.
8. Hochstenbach R., Meijer J. Rapid detection of chromosomal aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Prenat Diagn 2005, 25(11):1032-1039.
9. Slater H.R., Bruno D.L., Ren H., Pertile M., Schouten J.P., Choo K.H. Rapid, high throughput prenatal detection of aneuploidy using a novel quantitative method (MLPA). J Med Genet 2003, 40(12):907-912.
10. Gardner R.J.M., Sutherland G.R. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling 2004, Oxford University Press, New York (NY). 3rd ed.
11. Huang B., Solomon S., Thangavelu M., Peters K., Bhatt S. Supernumerary marker chromosomes detected in 100,000 prenatal diagnoses: molecular cytogenetic studies and clinical significance. Prenat Diagn 2006, 26(12):1142-1150.
12. Robinson W.P., McGillivray B., Lewis M.E., Arbour L., Barrett I., Kalousek D.K. Prenatally detected trisomy 20 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 2005, 25(3):239-244.
13. Ogilvie C.M., Lashwood A., Chitty L., Waters J.J., Scriven P.N., Flinter F. The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down's Syndrome testing. BJOG 2005, 112(10):1369-1375.
14. Leung W.C., Waters J.J., Chitty L. Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses. Prenat Diagn 2004, 24(10):790-795.
15. Chitty L.S., Kagan K.O., Molina F.S., Waters J.J., Nicolaides K.H. Fetal nuchal translucency scan and early prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities by rapid aneuploidy screening: observational study. BMJ 2006, 332(7539):452-455.
16. Ogilvie C.M. Prenatal diagnosis for chromosome abnormalities: past, present and future. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2003, 51(3):156-160.
17. Leung W.C., Lau E.T., Lao T.T., Tang M.H. Can amnio-polymerase chain reaction alone replace conventional cytogenetic study for women with positive biochemical screening for fetal Down syndrome?. Obstet Gynecol 2003, 101(5 Pt 1):856-861.
18. Caine A., Maltby A.E., Parkin C.A., Waters J.J., Crolla J.A. Prenatal detection of Down's syndrome by rapid aneuploidy testing for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21 by FISH or PCR without a full karyotype: a cytogenetic risk assessment. Lancet 2005, 366(9480):123-128.
19. Ryall R.G., Callen D., Cocciolone R., Duvnjak A., Esca R., Frantzis N., et al. Karyotypes found in the population declared at increased risk of Down syndrome following maternal serum screening. Prenat Diagn 2001, 21(7):553-557.
20. Brun J.L., Gangbo F., Wen Z.Q., Galant K., Taine L., Maugey-Laulom B., et al. Prenatal diagnosis and management of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a report on 98 cases. Prenat Diagn 2004, 24(3):213-218.
21. Abramsky L., Hall S., Levitan J., Marteau T.M. What parents are told after prenatal diagnosis of a sex chromosome abnormality: interview and questionnaire study. BMJ 2001, 322(7284):463-466.