Cultural heritage in EIA - Reflections on practice in North West Europe

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 215-238

  Jones, Carys E ^a   Slinn, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Archaeology; Cultural heritage; EIA; North west Europe

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL HERITAGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 58149380273     PISSN: 14643332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1464333208003056     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Antrop, M (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1-2), 21-34.
2. Barker, A and C Wood (1999). An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 19(4), 387-404.
3. Benson, J (2003). What's the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21, 261-271.
4. Bond, A, L Langstaff, and C Ruelle (2002). Monitoring and post-evaluation of the cultural heritage component of environmental assessments, SUIT Position Paper 4, October, http://www.lema.ulg.ac.be/ research/suit/Reports/Public/SUIT5.2d_PPaper.pdf [19 August 2008].
5. Bond, AJ, L Langstaff, R Baxter, HWJ Kofoed, K Lisitzin and S Lundström (2004). Dealing with the cultural heritage aspect of environmental impact assessment in Europe. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(1), 37-45.
6. Braithwaite, R, J Hopkins, and P Grover (2001). Archaeological and other material cultural assets. In Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment, P Morris and R Therivel, eds. London: Spon Press, pp. 122-144.
7. Communities and Local Government (2004). Scoping, In Note on environmental impact assessment directive for local planning authorities, 19 April 2004, http://www.communities. gov.uk/ planningandbuilding/planning/sustainabilityenvironmental/ environmentalimpactassessment/noteenvironmental/ [18 August 2008].
8. Council of Europe (1992). European convention on the protection of the archaeological heritage (Revised) Valetta, 16.1.1992, European Treaty Series 143, Council of Europe, Strasbourg. http://conventions.coe.int/ Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/143.htm [18 August 2008].
9. Edwards, J (1998). "The need for a bit of history": Place and past in English identity. In Locality and Belonging, N Lowell, ed. London: Routledge.
10. EIA Centre and Land use Consultants (2006). Evidence review of scoping in environmental impact assessment, Department for Communitoes and Local Government, London. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/ planningandbuilding/evidencereview [18 August 2008].
11. Erikstad, L, I Lindblom, G Jerpåsen, MA Hanssen, T Bekkby, O Stabbetoro and V Bakkestuen (2008). Environmental value assessment in a multidisciplinary setting. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, 131-143.
12. European Commission (1997). Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment Official Journal No. L073, 14/03/1997, p. 0005. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31997L0011:EN:HTML [18 August 2008].
13. European Commission (2001). Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment Official Journal No. L197, 21/07/2001, p. 0030. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001L0042:EN:HTML [18 August 2008].
14. European Commission (2003). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directive 97/11/EC) - How successful are the Member States in implementing the EIA Directive (Impacts Assessment Unit, Oxford Brookes University) DG Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/report_en.pdf [18 August 2008].
15. European Commission (2008). Report on the Evaluation on EU legislation - Directive 85/337/EEC (Environmental Impact Assessment, EIA) and associated amendments (GHK, Technopolis, Birmingham) DG Enterprise & Industry. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/dgs/doc/eval/eia.pdf [9 October 2008].
16. Gibson, RB, S Hassan, S Holtz, J Tansey and G Whitelaw (2005). Sustainability Assessment - Criteria, Processes and Application. London: Earthscan.
17. Gray, I and G Edwards-Jones (2003). A review of environmental statements in the British forest sector. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(4), 303-312.
18. Jay, S, C Jones, P Slinn and C Wood (2007). Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(4), 287-300.
19. Jones, CE, P Slinn, P Burggraaff, K-D Kleefeld and G Lambrick (2006). Cultural heritage and environmental impact assessment in the planarch area of North West Europe. Maidstone: Kent County Council. http://www.planarch.org/downloads/library/ action_3a_final_report_english.pdf [18 August 2008].
20. King, A (1996). Environmental impact assessment: Reviewing process and product. European Water Pollution Control, 6, 29-37.
21. King, TF (2000). What should be the "cultural resources" element of an EIA? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20, 5-30.
22. Lambrick, GH (1993). Environmental assessment and the cultural heritage: Principles and practice. In Environmental Assessment and Archaeology I Ralston and R Thomas, eds. Birmingham: Institute of Field Archaeologists, pp. 9-19.
23. Lee, N, R Colley, J Bonde and J Simpson (1999). Reviewing the quality of environmental statements and environmental appraisals. Occasional Paper 55, Manchester: EIA Centre, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester.
24. Marshall, R, J Arts and A Morrison-Saunders (2005). International principles for best practice EIA follow-up. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3), 175-181.
25. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (1999). The Belvedere Memorandum. A Policy Document examining the Relationship between Cultural History and Spatial Planning. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM).
26. Morrison-Saunders, A and J Arts (eds.) (2004). Assessing Impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up. London: Earthscan.
27. Richardson, T (2005). Environmental assessment and planning theory: Four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 341-365.
28. Sadler, B (2004). On evaluating the success of EIA and SEA. In Assessing Impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up, A Morrison-Saunders and J Arts, eds. London: Earthscan, pp. 248-285.
29. Teller, J and A Bond (2002). Review of present European environmental policies and legislation involving cultural heritage. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(6), 611-632.
30. Turnpenny, M (2004). Cultural heritage, an ill-defined concept? A call for joined-up policy. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(3), 295-307.