On evaluating the success of EIA and SEA

Assessing Impact: Handbook of EIA and SEA Follow-up

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 248-285

  Sadler, Barry ^a  

^a NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85083240982     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849770507-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Annandale, D (2001) ‘Developing and evaluating environmental impact assessment systems for small developing countries’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 19, pp 187-193
2. Arts, J (1998) EIA Follow-up -On the Role of Ex Post Evaluation in Environmental Impact Assessment, Groningen, Geo Press
3. Berg, M (1982) ‘Increasing the utility and utilization of assessment studies’, Impact Assessment Bulletin, vol 1, pp 41-51
4. Bonde, J and Cherp, A (2000) ‘Quality review package for strategic environmental assessments of land-use plans’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 18, pp 99-110
5. Caldwell, L, Bartlett, D, Parker, D and Keys, D (1982) A Study of Ways to Improve the Scientific Content and Methodology of Environmental Impact Analysis, Advanced Studies in Science, Technology and Public Affairs, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Bloomington, Indiana University
6. CEAA, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (1996) Review of the Implementation of the Environmental Assessment Process for Policy and Program Proposals, Ottawa, CEAA
7. CEAA, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (1999) Review of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act: A Discussion Paper for Public Consultation, Ottawa, CEAA
8. CEAA, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2000) Guidelines for Implementing the Cabinet Directive, Ottawa, CEAA
9. CEAA, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2003) ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment at the Federal Level in Canada’, in Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment (ed) SEA Systems and Applications to Policy and Legislation, The Hague, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment
10. CEARC, Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council (1988) Evaluating Environmental Impact Assessment: An Action Prospectus, Ottawa, CEARC
11. CEC, Commission of the European Community (2003) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive, Brussels, CEC
12. CEQ, Council on Environmental Quality (1975) Environmental Quality, The Sixth Annual Report of the (US) Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office
13. CEQ, Council on Environmental Quality (1976a) Environmental Quality, The Seventh Annual Report of the (US) Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office
14. CEQ, Council on Environmental Quality (1976b) Environmental Impact Statements: An Analysis of Six Years’ Experience by Seventy Federal Agencies, Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office
15. CEQ, Council of Environmental Quality (1977) Environmental Quality, The Eighth Annual Report of the (US) Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office
16. CEQ, Council on Environmental Quality (1997) The National Environmental Policy Act -A Study of its Effectiveness after Twenty-five Years, Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office
17. CESD, Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development (1998) ‘Environmental Assessment -A Critical Tool for Sustainable Development’ in 1998 Report of the Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development, Ottawa, Government of Canada
18. CESD, Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development (1999) ‘Greening Policies and Programs -Supporting Sustainable Development Decisions’ in 1999 Report of the Commissioner for Environment and Sustainable Development, Ottawa, Government of Canada
19. Dalal-Clayton, B and Sadler, B (1998) ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Rapidly Evolving Approach’, in Donnelly, A, Dalal-Clayton, B and Hughes, R (eds) A Directory of Impact Assessment Guidelines, International Institute for Environment and Development, Nottingham, Russell Press, pp 31-42
20. Dalal-Clayton, B and Sadler, B (2003) The Status and Potential of Strategic Environmental Assessment, London, International Institute for Environment and Development
21. Davies, M and Sadler, B (1990) Post Project Analysis and the Improvement of Guidelines for Environmental Monitoring and Audit, Environment Protection Series EPS 6/FA/1, Ottawa, Beauregard Printers Ltd
22. Devuyst, D (1994) Instruments for the Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment, Brussels, Vrije Universiteit
23. Doyle, D and Sadler, B (1996) Environmental Assessment in Canada: Frameworks, Procedures and Attributes of Effectiveness, Ottawa, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
24. Emmelin, L (1998) ‘Evaluating environmental impact assessment systems -part 1: Theoretical and methodological considerations’, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, vol 15, pp 129-148
25. Gershberg, S (2001) Five Year Review of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, presentation to intergovernmental forum, Impact Assessment in the Urban Context, 21st Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, 26 May-1 June 2001, Cartagena, Colombia
26. Gibson, R (1993) ‘Environmental assessment design: Lessons from the Canadian experience’, The Environmental Professional, vol 15, pp 12-24
27. Goodland, R and Sadler, B (1996) ‘The analysis of environmental sustainability: From concepts to application’, International Journal of Sustainable Development, vol 3, pp 2-21
28. Green, K and Raphael, A (2002) Third Environmental Assessment Review (FY 96-00) Environment Department, Washington DC, the World Bank
29. Hollick, M (1986) ‘EIA: An international evaluation’, Environmental Management, vol 10, pp 157-178
30. IAIA, International Association for Impact Assessment (2002) IAIA Survey of Impact Assessment Practice, Trends and Developments, Fargo, ND, IAIA
31. IEA, Institute of Environmental Assessment (1997) The Status and Practice of SEA, Tokyo, report prepared in consultation with Japan Research Institute for Japan Environment Agency
32. IEA, Institute of Environmental Assessment (1999) The Status and Practice of SEA, unpublished report, Lincoln, UK, IEA [now Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment]
33. Kjorven, O and Lindhjem, H (2002) Strategic Environmental Assessment in World Bank Operations: Experience to Date -Future Potential, Environment Strategy Paper No. 4, Environment Department, Washington, DC, World Bank
34. Lawrence, D (1997) ‘Quality and effectiveness of environmental impact assessments: Lessons and insights from ten assessments in Canada’, Project Appraisal vol 12, pp 219-232
35. Lee, N and Colley, R (1990) Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Statements, Occasional Paper 24, EIA Centre, Department of Planning and Landscape, Manchester, University of Manchester
36. Lee, N, Walsh, F and Reeder, G (1994) ‘Assessing the performance of the EA process’, Project Appraisal, vol 9, pp 161-172
37. Lee, N and George, C (eds) (2001) Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries, Chichester, John Wiley
38. Lee Wilson and Associates (1992) Verification of NEPA Predictions on Environmental Assessments of Oklahoma Surface Coal Mines, Dallas, Lee Wilson and Associates, report for US Environmental Protection Agency Region 6
39. Mercier, J R (2001) ‘Environmental Assessment at the World Bank: New Developments and Strategic Directions,' in Environmental Assessment Yearbook 2001, Lincoln, UK, EIA Centre, University of Manchester and Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, pp 63-65
40. Morrison-Saunders, A, Baker, J and Arts, J (2003) ‘Lessons from practice: Towards successful follow-up’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 21, pp 43-56
41. Munro, D, Bryant, T and Matte-Baker, A (1986) Learning From Experience, A Stateof-the-Art Review and Evaluation of Environmental Impact Assessment Audits, Hull, Quebec, Canadian Environmental Assessment and Research Council (CEARC), Minister of Supply and Services
42. Netherlands Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment (1996) Environmental Impact Assessment in The Netherlands: Experience and views presented by and to the Commission for EIA, Utrecht
43. O’Riordan, T (1998) ‘Interdisciplinarity in environmental science’, Environmental Assessment, vol 6, pp 28-29
44. Ortolano, L, Jenkins, B and Abracosa, R (1987) ‘Speculations on when and why EIA is effective’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol 7, pp 285-292
45. Ortolano, L and Shepherd, A (1995) ‘Environmental Impact Assessment’ in Vanclay, F and Bronstein, D A (eds) Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Chichester, John Wiley, pp 3-31
46. Petts, J (ed) (1999) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment: Volume 1. Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Methods and Potential, Oxford, Blackwell Science
47. Porter, A and Fittipaldi, J (eds) (1998) Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, Fargo, ND, The Press Club
48. Sadler, B (ed) (1987) Audit and Evaluation in Environmental Assessment and Management, Canadian and International Experience Volumes I and II. Commissioned Research, Ottawa, Beauregard Press Ltd
49. Sadler, B (1988) ‘Evaluation of Assessment: Post-EIS Research and Process Development’ in Wathern, P (ed) Environmental Impact Assessment, Theory and Practice, London, Unwin Hyman, pp 129-142
50. Sadler, B (1990) An Evaluation of the Beaufort Sea Environmental Assessment Panel, Ottawa, Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office
51. Sadler, B (1996) International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment, Final Report, Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating Practice to Improve Performance, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the International Association for Impact Assessment, Minister of Supply and Services, Canada
52. Sadler, B (1997) EIA Process Strengthening -Perspectives and Priorities, in EIA Process Strengthening Workshop, Canberra, Environment Protection Agency
53. Sadler, B (1998) ‘Ex Post Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment’ in Porter, A and Fittipaldi, J (eds) Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, Fargo, ND, International Association for Impact Assessment, pp 30-40
54. Sadler, B (1999) ‘A Framework for Environmental Sustainability Assessment and Assurance’ in Petts J (ed), Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment: Volume 1. Environmental Impact Assessment: Process, Methods and Potential, Oxford, Blackwell Science, pp 12-32
55. Sadler, B (2001a) ‘A Framework Approach to Strategic Environmental Assessment: Aims, Principles and Elements of Good Practice’ in Dusik, J (ed) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Public Participation and Health Aspects in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Szentendre, Hungary, Regional Environment Center, pp 11-24
56. Sadler, B (2001b) ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment: An Aide Memoire to Drafting a SEA Protocol to the Espoo Convention’ in Dusik, J (ed) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Public Participation and Health Aspects in Strategic Environmental Assessment, Szentendre, Hungary, Regional Environment Center, pp 25-34
57. Sadler, B (2001c) ‘Strategic Assessment and Planning in the UK -Thames Water Case Study’, in Environmental Assessment Yearbook 2001, Lincoln, Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and EIA Centre, University of Manchester, pp 98-101
58. Sadler B (2002) ‘From Environmental Assessment to Sustainability Appraisal’ in Environmental Assessment Yearbook 2002, Lincoln, Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and EIA Centre, University of Manchester, pp 145-152
59. Sadler, B and Baxter, M (1998) ‘Guide to environmental management’, Environmental Assessment, vol 6, pp 15-20
60. Sadler, B and Verheem, R (1996) Strategic Environmental Assessment -Status, Challenges and Future Directions, The Hague, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment
61. Sadler, B and Verheem, R (1997) Country Status Reports on Environmental Impact Assessment, Utrecht, Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment
62. Storey, K and Jones, P (2003) ‘Social impact assessment, impact management and follow-up: Case study of the construction of the Hibernia offshore platform’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 21, pp 99-108
63. UNEP, United Nations Environment Programme (2001) Reference Manual for the Integrated Assessment of Trade Related Policies, Geneva, United Nations Environment Program
64. UNEP, United Nations Environment Programme (2002) Global Environment Outlook 3 (GEO 3): Past, Present and Future Perspectives, published in association with United Nations Environment Program, London, Earthscan
65. Wende, W (2001) ‘Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol 19, pp 93-100
66. Weston, J, Glasson, J, Therivel, R, Wilson, E and Frost, R (1997) ‘Environmental statements, environmental information, environmental assessments and the UK planning process’, Project Appraisal vol 12, pp 233-242
67. Whitehead, L and Saul, D (2001) ‘Strategic Environmental Assessment of the UK Strategic Defence Review’ in Environmental Assessment Yearbook 2001, Lincoln, Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and EIA Centre, University of Manchester, pp 98-101
68. Wood, C (1995) Environmental Impact Assessment -A Comparative Review, 1st edition, Harlow, Longman Scientific and Technical
69. Wood C (1999) ‘Comparative Evaluation of EIA Systems’, in Petts J (ed) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment: Volume 2 Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice: Impact and Limitations, Oxford, Blackwell Science, pp 10-34
70. Wood, C (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment -A Comparative Review, 2nd edition, Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd
71. World Commission on Dams (2000) Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making, London, Earthscan, Available: http://www.dams.org/report/(19/9/03)
72. UNECE, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1990) Post Project Analysis in Environmental Impact Assessment, New York, United Nations
73. World Bank (1993) Annual Review of Environmental Assessment 1992, Washington, DC, Environment Department, World Bank
74. World Bank (1996) The Impact of Environmental Assessment -A Review of World Bank Experience, Environment Department Technical Paper No. 363, Washington, DC, World Bank