The effect of the programs for demand response incentives in competitive electricity markets

European Transactions on Electrical Power

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 127-139

  Bompard, Ettore ^a   Napoli, Roberto ^a   Wan, Bo ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Demand response (DR) programs; Distributed energy resources (DER); Economic load response programs (ELRP); Time of use (TOU)

Indexed keywords

ELASTICITY; ENERGY RESOURCES; GAME THEORY; MARKETING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS; DEMAND ELASTICITIES; DEMAND RESPONSE (DR) PROGRAMS; DEMAND RESPONSES; DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES (DER); DR PROGRAMS; ECONOMIC LOAD RESPONSE PROGRAMS (ELRP); ELECTRICITY MARKETS; ELECTRICITY PRICES; GENERATION COMPANIES; LERNER INDICES; LOAD CURTAILMENTS; MARKET POWERS; NUMERICAL STUDIES; POOL MARKETS; SPECIAL FEATURES; STORABILITY; STRATEGIC BIDDINGS; TIME OF USE (TOU);

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS;

EID: 58149379972     PISSN: 1430144X     EISSN: 15463109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etep.265     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Lai LL. Power System Restructuring and Deregulation, 1st edn. Wiley: London, 2001. ISBN-10: 047149500X
2. El Khatib S, Galiana FD. Negotiating bilateral contracts in electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2007; 22(2):553-562.
3. Mensah-Bonsu C, Oren S. California electricity market crisis: causes, remedies, and prevention. IEEE Power Engineering Review 2002; 22(8):4-5.
4. Wu DJ, Kleindorfer P, Zhang JE. Optimal bidding and contracting strategies in the deregulated electric power market: part II. Proceedings of the 34th Hawii International Conference on System Sciences, 2001.
5. Bompard E, Ma Y, Napoli R, Abrate G. The demand elasticity impacts on the strategic bidding behavior of the electricity producers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2007; 22(1): 188-197.
6. Sezgen O, Goldman CA, Krishnarao P. Option value of electricity demand response. Energy 2007; 32:108-119.
7. U.S Department of Energy. Benefits of demand response in electricity markets and recommendation for achieving them - A report to the United State Congress Pursuant to section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. February 2006.
8. Albadi MH, El-Saadany EF. Demand response in electricity markets: an overview, power engineering society general meeting. IEEE 24-28 June 2007, pp. 1-5, Digital object identifier 10.1109/PES.2007.385728.
9. Ng'uni A, Tuan LA. Interruptible load and demand response: worldwide picture and the situation in Sweden. Power Symposium NAPS2006.38th North American, September 2006, pp. 121-127.
10. Goldman C, Hopper N, Bharvirkar R, et al A. methodology for estimating large-customer demand response market potential. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, August 2007.
11. Borenstein S, Jaske M, Rosenfeld A. Dynamic pricing, advanced metering and demand response in electricity markets, October 2002, [Online] available at: http://www.ucei.berkeley.edu/pdf/csemwp105.pdf
12. Bompard E, Abrate G, Napoli R, Wan B. Multi-agent models for consumer choice and retailer strategies in the competitive electricity market. International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems 2007; 8(2):Article 4.
13. Hopper N, Goldman C, Bharvirkar R, Engel D. The summer of 2006: a milestone in the ongoing maturation of demand response. Ernest Orland Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
14. Hartway R, Price S, Woo CK. Smart meter, customer choice and profitable time-of-use rate option. Energy 1999; 24:895-903.
15. New England Demand Response Initiative, price-responsive load programs, 13 September 2002, [online] available: http://nedri.raabassociates.org/Articles/ NEDRI%20PRL%209-10-02. doc
16. Ilic M, Black JW, Watz JL. Potential benefits of implementing load control. Power engineering society winter meeting, 2002 IEEE, Vol. 1. January 2002, pp. 177-182.
17. Sheen JN. Economic profitability analysis of demand side management program. Energy Conversion and Management 2005; 46:2919-2935.
18. Fahrioglu M, Alvarado FL. Designing incentive compatible contracts for effective demand management. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2000; 15(4):1255-1260.
19. Lee T-Y. Operating schedule of battery energy storage system in a time-of-use rate industrial user with wind turbine generators: a multipass iteration particle swarm optimization approach. IEEE transaction on energy conversion. Digital object identifier 10.1109/TEC.2006.878239.
20. Gutierrez G, Madrigal M, de Rosenzweig F, Aguado J. The effect of bilateral contracting and demand responsiveness on market power in the Mexican electricity system. 2003 IEEE Bologna PowerTech conference, 23-26 June, Bologna, Italy.
21. Bompard E, Ma Y, Napoli R, Abrate G, Ragazzi E. The impacts of price responsiveness on strategic equilibrium, in competitive electricity markets. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2007; 29:397-407.
22. Bompard E, Correia P, Gross G. Congestion management schemes: a comparative analysis under a unified framework. IEEE Transactions Power Systems 2003; 18(1):346-352.
23. Day CJ, Hobbs BF, Pang JS. Oligopolistic competition in power networks: a conjectured supply function approach. IEEE Transactions Power Systems 2002 17(3):597-607.
24. Bompard E, Lu W, Napoli R. Network constraint impacts on the competitive electricity markets under supply side strategic bidding. IEEE Transactions Power Systems 2006; 21(1): 160-170.