Characterizing source sink dynamics with genetic parentage assignments

Ecology

Volumn 89, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2746-2759

  Peery, M Zachariah ^a,b,c   Beissinger, Steven R ^a   House, Roger F ^d   Bérubé, Martine ^a,e   Hall, Laurie A ^c   Sellas, Anna ^a   Palsbøll, Per J ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIES   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

^e STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Brachyramphus marmotus; Demography; Immigration; Marbled Murrelets; Microsatellites; Parent offspring dyads; Parentage assignments; Source sink dynamics

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; GENETICS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; IMMIGRATION; MIGRATION; POPULATION MODELING; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SEABIRD; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

BRACHYRAMPHUS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GENE FLOW; GENE POOL; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION MIGRATION; TIME;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; BIRDS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; GENE FLOW; GENE POOL; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 58149359979     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/07-2026.1     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baker, L. M., M. Z. Peery, S. R. Beissinger, E. E. Burkett, S. W. Singer, and D. L. Suddjian. 2006. Nesting habitat characteristics of Marbled Murrelets in central California redwood forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:939-946.
2. Becker, B, H., and S. R. Beissinger. 2006. Centennial decline in the trophic level of an endangered seabird after fisheries collapse. Conservation Biology 20:470-479.
3. Becker, B. H., M. Z. Peery, and S. R. Beissinger. 2007. Ocean climate and prey availability affect the trophic level and reproductive success of the Marbled Murrelet, an endangered seabird. Marine Ecology Progress Series 329:267-279.
4. Beerli, P., and J. Felsenstein. 2001. Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective populations sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 98: 4563-4568.
5. Beissinger, S. R., and M. Z. Peery. 2007. Reconstructing the historical demography of an endangered seabird, Ecology 88: 296-305.
6. Berry, O., M. D. Toucher, and S. D. Sarre. 2004. Can assignment tests measure dispersal? Molecular Ecology 13: 551-561.
7. Blouin, M. S., M. Parsons, V. La Caille, and S. Lotz. 1996. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Molecular Ecology 5:393-401. '
8. Bossart, J. L., and D. P. Powell. 1998. Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons, and new directions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:202-206.
9. Cornuet, J.-M., S. Piry, G. Luikart, A. Estoup, and M. Solignac. 1999. New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989-2000.
10. Dakin, E. E., and J. C. Avise. 2004. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93:504-509.
11. Dearborn, D. C., A. D. Anders, E. A. Schreiber, R. M. M. Adams, and U. Muellers. 2003. Inter-island movements and population differentiation in a pelagic seabird. Molecular Ecology 12:2835-2843.
12. Diffendorfer, J. E. 1998. Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81:417-433.
13. Faubet, P., R. S. Waples, and O. E. Gaggiotti. 2007. Evaluating the performance of a multilocus Bayesian method for the estimation of migration rates. Molecular Ecology 16:1149-1166.
14. Friesen, V. L., T. P. Birt, J. F. Piatt, R, T. Golightly, S. H. Newman, P. N. Hébert, B. C. Congdon, and G. Gissing. 2005. Population genetic structure and conservation of marbled murrelets (Brachyramphus marmoratus). Conservation Genetics 6:607-614.
15. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6:65-70.
16. Holt, R. D., and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2004. Conservation implications of niche conservatism and evolution in heterogeneous environments. Pages 244-264 in R. Fernere, U. Dieckmann, and D. Couvet, editors, Evolutionary conservation biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17. Johnson, D. M. 2004. Source-sink dynamics in a temporally heterogeneous environment. Ecology 85:2037-2045.
18. Kruzer, M. P., and N. J. Huntly. 2003. Habitat-specific demography: evidence for source-sink population structure in a mammal, the pika. Oecologia 134:343-349.
19. MacDonald. D. W. and D. P. Johnson. 2001. Dispersal in theory and practice: consequences for conservation biology. Pages 358-372 in J. Clobert, E. Danchi, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols, editors. Dispersal. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK.
20. McPeek, M. A., and R. D. Holt. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. American Naturalist 140:1010-1027.
21. Nelson, S. K. 1997. Marbled Murrelet. Pages 1-25 in F. Poole and A. Gill, editors. Birds of North America, No. 276. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and the American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C., USA.
22. Nichols, J. D., J. E. Hines, J.-D. Lebreton, and R. Pradel. 2000. Estimation of contributions of a reverse-time capture-recapture approach. Ecology 81:3362-3376.
23. Nielsen, R., and J. Wakeley. 2001, Distinguishing migration from isolation: a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach. Genetics 158:885-896.
24. Paetkau, D., W. Calvert, I. Stirling, and C. Strobeck. 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4:347-354.
25. Palsbøll, P. J. 1999. Genetic tagging: contemporary molecular ecology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68:3-22.
26. Palsbøll, P. J., et al. 1997. Genetic tagging of humpback whales. Nature 388:767-769.
27. ST: analysis of population genetic data for conservation. Conservation Genetics 5:585-602.
28. Peery, M. Z., B. H. Becker, and S. R. Beissinger. 2006a. Combining demographic and count-based approaches to identify source-sink dynamics of a threatened seabird. Ecological Applications 16:1516-1528.
29. Peery, M. Z., B. H. Becker, and S. R. Beissinger. 2007. Age ratios as estimators of productivity: testing assumptions on a threatened seabird, the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus mwmoratus). Auk 124:224-240.
30. Peery, M. Z., S. R, Beissinger, E. Burkett, and S. H. Newman. 20066. Local survival of Marbled Murrelets in central California: roles of oceanographie processes, sex, and radio-tagging. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:78-88.
31. Peery, M. Z., S. R. Beissinger, S. H. Newman, B. H. Becker, E. Burkett, and T. D. Williams. 2004a. Individual and temporal variation in inland flight behavior of Marbled Murrelets: implications for population monitoring. Condor 106:344-353.
32. Pcery, M. Z., S. R. Bcissinger, S. H. Newman, E. Burkett, and T. D. Williams. 2004b. Applying the declining population paradigm: diagnosing causes of poor reproduction in the Marbled Murrelet. Conservation Biology 18:1088-1098.
33. Peery, M. Z., L. A. Henkel, S. H. Newman, B. H. Becker, J. T. Harvey, C. Thompson, and S. R. Beissinger. 2008. Effects of rapid flight-feather molt on post-breeding dispersal in a pursuit-diving seabird. Auk 125:113-123.
34. Piatt, J. F., K. J. Kuletz, A. E. Burger, S. A. Hatch, V. L. Friesen, T. P. Birt, M. L. Arimitsu, G. S. Drew, A. M. A. Harding, and K. S. Bixler. 2007. Status review of the Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) in Alaska and British Columbia. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006-1387.
35. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945-959.
36. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
37. Rannala, B., and J. L. Mountain. 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 94:9197-9201.
38. Rew, M. B., M. Z. Peery, S. R. Beissinger, M. Bérubé, J. D. Lozier, E. M. Rubidge, and P. J. Palsbøll. 2006. Cloning and characterization of 29 tetranucleotide and two dinucleotide polymorphic microsatellite loci from the endangered marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus). Molecular Ecology Notes 6:241-244.
39. Runge, J. P., M. C. Runge, and J. D. Nichols. 2006. The role of local population within a landscape context: defining and classifying sources and sinks. American Naturalist 167:925-938.
40. Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457-462.
41. Telfer, S., S. B. Piertney, J. D. Dallas, W. A. Stewart, F. Marshall, J. L. Gow, and X. Lambin. 2003. Parentage assignment detects frequent and large-scale dispersal in water voles. Molecular Ecology 12:1939-1949.
42. Thomas, C. D., and W. E. Kunin. 1999. The spatial structure of populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:647-657.
43. Waples, R. S. 1998. Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. Journal of Heredity 89:438-450.
44. Waples, R., and O. Gaggiotti, 2006. What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Molecular Ecology 15:1419-1439.
45. Waser, P. M., J. D. Busch, C. R. McCormick, and J. A. DeWoody. 2006. Parentage analysis detects cryptic precapture dispersal in a philopatric rodent. Molecular Ecology 15: 1929-1937.
46. Waser, P. M., and C. Strobeck. 1998. Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:43-44.
47. ST not equal to 1/(4Nm+1). Heredity 82:117-125.
48. Wilson, G. A., and B. Rannala. 2003. Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177-1191.
49. Wright, S. 1969. The theory of gene frequencies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.