Source-sink dynamics in a temporally heterogeneous environment

Ecology

Volumn 85, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 2037-2045

  Johnson, Derek Marley ^a,b  

^a University of Miami   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cephaloleia fenestrata; Dispersal; Disturbance; Flooding; Mark recapture; Pleiostachya pruinosa; Source sink dynamics; Survival; Temporal heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; DISPERSAL; DISTURBANCE; FLOODING; HETEROGENEITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

CEPHALOLEIA; CEPHALOLEIA FENESTRATA; CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; FENESTRIDA; PLEIOSTACHYA PRUINOSA;

EID: 4444254090     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/03-0508     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 268-281 in B. N. Petrov and F. Csàki, editors. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
2. Ambrose, H. W., III, and K. P. Ambrose. 1987. A handbook of biological investigation. Hunter Textbooks, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
3. Amezcua, A. B., and M. Holyoak. 2000. Empirical evidence for predator-prey source-sink dynamics. Ecology 81:3087-3098.
4. Andrewartha, H. G., and L. C. Birch. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
5. Boughton, D. A. 1999. Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfly metapopulation. Ecology 80:2727-2739.
6. Brawn, J. D., and S. K. Robinson. 1996. Source-sink population dynamics may complicate the interpretation of longer-term census data. Ecology 77:3-12.
7. Breininger, D. R., and G. M. Carter. 2003. Territory quality transitions and source-sink dynamics in a Florida Scrub-Jay population. Ecological Applications 13:516-529.
8. Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302-1310.
9. De Bruijn, O. 1994. Population ecology and conservation of the Barn Owl Tyto alba in farmland habitats in Liemers and Achterhoek (the Netherlands). Ardea 82:1-109.
10. Dias, P. C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:326-330.
11. Diffendorfer, J. E. 1998. Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81:417-433.
12. Doak, D. F. 1995. Source-sink models and the problem of habitat degradation: general models and applications to the Yellowstone grizzly. Conservation Biology 9:1370-1379.
13. Donahue, M. J., M. Holyoak, and C. Feng. 2003. Patterns of dispersal and dynamics among habitat patches varying in quality. American Naturalist 162:302-317.
14. Gaona, P., P. Ferreras, and M. Delibes. 1998. Dynamics and viability of a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Ecological Monographs 68:349-370.
15. Glynn, P. W. 1991. Coral reef bleaching in the 1980s and possible connections to global warming. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:175-179.
16. Hanley, T. A., and J. C. Barnard. 1999. Spatial variation in population dynamics of Sitka mice in floodplain forest. Journal of Mammology 80:866-879.
17. Holt, R. D., M. Barfield, and A. Gonzalez. 2003. Impacts of environmental variability in open populations and communities: "inflation" in sink environments. Theoretical Population Biology 64:315-330.
18. Holt, R. H. 1985. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theoretical Population Biology 28:181-208.
19. Johnson, D. M. 2003. Spatial analyses of a Neotropical beetle: Cephaloleia fenestrata. Dissertation. University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA.
20. Kadmon, R., and K. Tielbörger. 1999. Testing for source-sink population dynamics: an experimental approach exemplified with desert annuals. Oikos 86:417-429.
21. Loreau, M., and D. L. DeAngelis. 1997. Source-sink dynamics and the coexistence of species on a single resource. Theoretical Population Biology 51:79-93.
22. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
23. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
24. Schreiber, R. W., and E. A. Schreiber. 1984. Central Pacific seabirds and the El Niño southern oscillation: 1982 to 1983 perspectives. Science 225:713-716.
25. Staines, C. L. 1996. The genus Cephaloleia (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Central America and the West Indies. Special Publication No. 3 of the Revista de Biologia Tropical. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, San Jose, Costa Rica.
26. Strong, D. R., Jr. 1977. Rolled-leaf hispine beetles (Chrysomelidae) and their Zingeberales host plants in Middle America. Biotropica 9:156-169.
27. Unruh, T. R., and R. L. Chauvin. 1993. Elytral punctures: a rapid, reliable method for marking Colorado potato beetle. Canadian Entomologist 125:55-63.
28. Virgl, J. A., and F. Messier. 2000. Assessment of source-sink theory for predicting demographic rates among habitats that exhibit temporal changes in quality. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:1483-1493.
29. Walters, S. 2001. Landscape pattern and productivity effects on source-sink dynamics of deer populations. Ecological Modelling 143:17-32.
30. Watkinson, A. R., and W. J. Sutherland. 1995. Source, sinks, and pseudosinks. Journal of Animal Ecology 64:126-130.
31. White, G. C., and K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program Mark: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120-139.
32. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.