Erratum: Doppler echocardiographic assessment of TTK chitra prosthetic heart valve in the mitral position (European Journal of Echocardiography (2008) DOI 10.1093/ejechocard/jen001);Doppler echocardiographic assessment of TTK Chitra prosthetic heart valve in the mitral position

European Journal of Echocardiography

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 599-604

  Namboodiri, Narayanan ^a   Shajeem, Othayoth ^a   Tharakan, Jaganmohan A ^a   Sankarkumar, R ^a   Titus, Thomas ^a   Valaparambil, Ajitkumar ^a   Sivasankaran, Sivasubramonian ^a   Krishnamoorthy, Kavassery Mahadevan ^a   Harikrishnan, Sivadasan Pillai ^a   Dora, Santosh Kumar ^a  

^a SREE CHITRA TIRUNAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Chitra valve; Doppler echocardiography; Prosthetic valve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FAILURE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ECHOGRAPHY; HEART VENTRICLE; PATHOLOGY;

CHITRA; DENTAL ALLOY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

DENTAL ALLOYS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MITRAL VALVE; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 58149340194     PISSN: 15252167     EISSN: 15322114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen030     Document Type: Erratum

References (27)

1. Bhuvaneshwar GS, Muraleedharan CV, Vijayan GA, Kumar RS, Valiathan MS. Development of the Chitra tilting disc heart valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:448-58.
2. Sankarkumar R, Bhuvaneshwar GS, Magotra R, Muralidharan S, Rajan RS, Saha D et al. Chitra heart valve: results of a multicenter clinical study. J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:619-27.
3. Rao S, Kurian VM, Ghosh M, Sankar kumar R, Mohan Singh MP, Valiathan MS. Clinical course after mitral valve replacement. Indian Heart J 1990;42:335-9.
4. Krishna Manohar SS, Valiathan MS, Sankar Kumar R, Balakrishnan KG, Venkitachalam CG, Bhuvaneshwar GS. Experience with the Chitra prosthetic valve: early results of clinical trial. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;7:105-8.
5. Williams GA, Labovitz AJ. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Bjork-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves. Am J Cardiol 1985;56:325-32.
6. Burstow DJ, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Reeder GS, Holmes DR, Seward JB et al. Continuous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter study. Circulation 1989;80:504-14.
7. Knebel F, Gliech V, Walde T, Eddicks S, Konertz W, Baumann G et al. High concordance of invasive and echocardiographic mean pressure gradients in patients with a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:332-7.
8. Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979;60:1096-104.
9. Karp K, Teien D, Eriksson P. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the valve area in patients with atrioventricular valve stenosis by application of the continuity equation. J Intern Med 1989;225:261-6.
10. Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, Kitabatake A, Fujii K, Kamada T. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 1988;77:78-85.
11. Voelker W, Regele B, Dittmann H, Mauser M, Ickrath O, Schmid KM et al. Effect of heart rate on transmitral flow velocity profile and Doppler measurements of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. Eur Heart J 1992;13:152-9.
12. Braverman AC, Thomas JD, Lee RT. Doppler echocardiographic estimation of mitral valve area during changing hemodynamic conditions. Am J Cardiol 1991;68:1485-90.
13. Wranne B, Ask P, Loyd D. Analysis of different methods of assessing the stenotic mitral valve area with emphasis on the pressure gradient halftime concept. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:614-20.
14. Karp K, Teien D, Eriksson P. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the valve area in patients with atrioventricular valve stenosis by application of the continuity equation. J Intern Med 1989;225:261-6.
15. Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, Kitabatake A, Fujii K, Kamada T. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 1988;77:78-85.
16. Mohan JC, Chawla R, Arora R. Methodological variation and agreement in assessing mitral valve orifice area by echo-Doppler methods in mitral stenosis. Indian Heart J 1996;48:653-7.
17. Dumesnil JG, Honos GN, Lemieux M, Beauchemin J. Validation and applications of mitral prosthetic valvular areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1990;65:1443-8.
18. Bitar JN, Lechin ME, Salazar G, Zoghbi WA. Doppler echocardiographic assessment with the continuity equation of St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:287-93.
19. Mohan JC, Agrawal R, Arora R, Khalilullah M. Improved Doppler assessment of the Bjork-Shiley mitral prosthesis using the continuity equation. Int J Cardiol 1994;43:321-6.
20. Wilansky S, Martin SL, Gaos CM, Jin BS, Hall RJ, Cooley DA. Echocardiographic evaluation of anuloplasty rings. Comparison of continuity equation and pressure half-time methods. Tex Heart Inst J 1994;21:189-92.
21. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:1116-27.
22. Barbetseas J, Zoghbi WA. Evaluation of prosthetic valve function and associated complications. Cardiol Clin 1998;16:505-30.
23. Chambers JB. Mitral pressure half-time: is it a valid measure of orifice area in artificial heart valves? J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:571-7.
24. Chambers JB, Wang Z, Cooke RA, Black MM. A comparison of valve resistance, the continuity equation, and the Gorlin formula against directly observed orifice area in bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position: an in vitro study. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:136-43.
25. Degertekin M, Gencbay M, Basaran Y, Duran I, Yilmaz H, Dindar I et al. Application of proximal isovelocity surface area method to determine prosthetic mitral valve area. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998;11:1056- 63.
26. Leung DY, Wong J, Rodriguez L, Pu M, Vandervoort PM, Thomas JD. Application of color Doppler flow mapping to calculate orifice area of St Jude mitral valve. Circulation 1998;98:1205-11.
27. Dumesnil JG, Yoganathan AP. Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areas. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:1268-72.