A comparison of the glaucoma probability score to earlier heidelberg retina tomograph data analysis tools in classifying normal and glaucoma patients

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 513-516

  Yip, Leonard W ^a,b   Mikelberg, Frederick S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Diagnostic imaging; Glaucoma diagnosis; Sensitivity and specificity; Tomography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EYE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOPOGRAPHY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; TOMOGRAPHY;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 58149337216     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815f5332     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120: 701-713.
2. Mikelberg F, Parfitt C, Swindale N, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma. 1995;4:242-247.
3. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
4. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, et al. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1730-1742.
5. Harizman N, Zelefsky JR, Ilitchev E, et al. Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph-III. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90: 1390-1392.
6. Coops A, Henson DB, Kwartz AJ, et al. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5348-5355.
7. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, et al. Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:466-471.
8. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1145-1150.
9. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:545-548.
10. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121-127.