Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 73, Issue 9, 2006, Pages

  Verstraete, F ^a   Cirac, J I ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR QUANTENOPTIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645062947     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.094423     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. K. G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.47.773 47, 773 (1975).
2. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69. 2863 69, 2863 (1992).
3. S. Ostlund and S. Rommer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3537 75, 3537 (1995);
4. J. Dukelsky, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i1998-00381-x 43, 457 (1997).
5. F. Verstraete, A. Weichselbaum, U. Schollwck, J. I. Cirac, and Jan von Delft, cond-mat/0504305 (unpublished).
6. S. Lloyd, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.274.5290.1073 273, 1073 (1996).
7. E. Fahri, quant-ph/0001106 (unpublished).
8. See, for example, V. Murg and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.042320 69, 042320 (2004).
9. J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Today PHTOAD 0031-9228 57 (3), 38 (2004).
10. R. F. Werner, Lett. Math. Phys. LMPHDY 0377-9017 10.1007/BF00399761 17, 359 (1989).
11. B. M. Terhal, IBM J. Res. Dev. IBMJAE 0018-8646 48, 71 (2003);
12. B. M. Terhal, A. C. Doherty, and D. Schwab, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.157903 90, 157903 (2003).
13. M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 0219-7499 1, 465 (2003).
14. M. R. Dowling, A. C. Doherty, and S. D. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062113 70, 062113 (2004).
15. R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 40, 4277 (1989).
16. M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.087903 92, 087903 (2004).
17. C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.150.321 150, 321 (1966);
18. C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.150.327 150, 327 (1966).
19. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, cond-mat/0407066 (unpublished).
20. O. F. Syljuåsen, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/j.physleta.2003.12.018 322, 25 (2004).
21. H.-Q. Lin, J. S. Flynn, and D. D. Betts, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.214411 64, 214411 (2001).
22. M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner, Commun. Math. Phys. CMPHAY 0010-3616 10.1007/BF02099178 144, 443 (1992);
23. A. Klümper, A. Schadschneider, and J. Zittartz, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/24/16/012 24, L955 (1991).
24. F. Verstraete, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.227205 93, 227205 (2004).
25. F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.060302 70, 060302 (R) (2004).
26. T. Nishino, Prog. Theor. Phys. PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.105.409 105, 409 (2001).
27. U. Schollwöck, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys. 77.259 77, 259 (2005).
28. M. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93. 126402 93, 140402 (2004).
29. As noted by T. Osborne, Hastings theorem is about operator norms and does not prove the following equation. P. Hayden [Commun. Math. Phys. CMPHAY 0010-3616 10.1007/s00220-004-1087-6 250, 371 (2004)] have indeed shown that orthogonal states exist for which all correlation functions are exponentially close to each other. Although it would be very surprising that ground states would exhibit that property, this prohibits to turn the presented handwaving argument into a rigorous one.
30. G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902 91, 147902 (2003).
31. F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and M. M. Wolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.140601 94, 140601 (2005).
32. This can directly be proven by considering the Neumark representation of a TPCP map as a unitary in a bigger space.
33. For noncritical systems, the renormalization group flow is expected to increase the Renyi entropies in the UV direction. The corresponding fixed point corresponds to a critical system whose entropy thus upper bounds that of the noncritical one.
34. I. Peschel, M. Kaulke, and O. Legeza, Ann. Phys. ANPYA2 0003-3804 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199902)8:2<153::AID-ANDP153>3.0.CO;2-N 8, 153 (1999).
35. A. Kitaev (private communication).
36. B.-Q. Jin and V. E. Korepin, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1023/B:JOSS.0000037230.37166.42 116, 79 (2004).
37. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, J. Stat. Mech., P06002 (2004).
38. G. Vidal, J. I. Latorre, E. Rico, and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227902 90, 227902 (2003).
39. We choose the 1 L dependence such as to assure that the absolute error in extensive observables does not grow.
40. Let us, e.g., specify a method which should in principle not get trapped in local minima. As in the adiabatic theorem, we can construct a time-dependent Hamiltonian H(t) with H(0) trivial and H(1) the Hamiltonian to simulate; if we discretize this evolution in a number of steps that grows polynomially in the inverse gap, the adiabatic theorem guarantees that we will end up in the ground state of H(1) if we can follow the ground state of H(t) closely. The idea is to make D of ψD (t) large enough such as to follow the ground state ψ(t) close enough in such a way that the optimization is always convex around the global optimum within the domain χ-ψ(t)≤.
41. M. Fannes, B. Nachtergaele, and R. F. Werner, Lett. Math. Phys. LMPHDY 0377-9017 10.1007/BF00406552 25, 249 (1992).
42. F. Verstraete, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.207204 93, 207204 (2004).
43. N. J. A. Sloane, Sequence A000009 (unpublished).