Disambiguating rhetorical structure

Research on Language and Computation

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 311-332

  Stede, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coherence; Corpus annotation; Discourse; Multi level analysis; Rhetorical structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149328378     PISSN: 15707075     EISSN: 15728706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11168-008-9053-7     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Asher N., Lascarides A. (2003) Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. J. Bateman 2001 Between the leaves of rhetorical structure: static and dynamic aspects of discourse organization Verbum 23 1 31 58
3. J. Bateman K.J. Rondhuis 1997 "Coherence relations": Towards a general specification Discourse Processes 24 1 3 50
4. M. Brandt I. Rosengren 1992 Zur Illokutionsstruktur von Texten Zeitschrift fr Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 86 9 51
5. S. Brants S. Dipper P. Eisenberg S. Hansen E. König W. Lezius C. Rohrer G. Smith H. Uszkoreit 2004 TIGER: Linguistic interpretation of a german corpus Research on Language and Computation 2 4 597 620
6. Brants, T., & Plaehn, O. (2000). Interactive corpus annotation. In Proceedings of Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2000). Athens.
7. Carlson, L., & Marcu, D. (2001). Discourse tagging reference manual. Technical report, University of Southern California/ISI.
8. Carlson L., Marcu D., Okurowski M.E. (2003) Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. In: van Kuppevelt J., Smith R. (eds) Current directions in discourse and dialogue. Kluwer, Dordrecht
9. Chiarcos, C., Dipper, S., Götze, M., Ritz, J., & Stede, M. (2008). A flexible framework for integrating annotations from different tools and tagsets. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Global Interoperability for Language Resources. Hongkong.
10. Dipper, S. (2005). XML-based stand-off representation and exploitation of multi-level linguistic annotation. In R. Eckstein & R. Tolksdorf (Eds.), Proceedings of Berliner XML Tage (pp. 39-50). Berlin: Humboldt University.
11. Figge, U. L. (1971). Syntagmatik, Distribution und Text. In W.-D. Stempel (Ed.), Beiträge zur Textlinguistik (pp. 161-181). München.
12. Freeman J.B. (1991) Dialectics and the macrostructure of argument. Foris, Berlin
13. B. Grosz C. Sidner 1986 Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse Computational Linguistics 12 3 175 204
14. Jasinskaja, K., Mayer, J., Boethke, J., Neumann, A., Peldszus, A., & Rodríguez, K. J. (2007). Discourse Tagging Guidelines for German Radio News and Newspaper Commentaries. Ms., Universität Potsdam.
15. Kehler A. (2002) Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. CSLI Publications, Stanford
16. Knott A., Oberlander J., O'Donnell M., Mellish C. (2001) Beyond elaboration: The interaction of relations and focus in coherent text. In: Sanders T., Schilperoord J., Spooren W. (eds) Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 181-196
17. Krasavina, O., & Chiarcos, C. (2007). PoCoS: The Potsdam Coreference Scheme. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW) at ACL-07. Prague.
18. Lötscher A. (1987) Text und Thema. Studien zur thematischen Konstituenz von Texten. Niemeyer, Tübingen
19. W. Mann S. Thompson 1988 Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization TEXT 8 243 281
20. Marcu D. (2000) The theory and practice of discourse parsing and summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge/MA
21. Martin J.R. (1992) English text: System and structure. John Benjamins, Philadelphia/Amsterdam
22. Matthiessen C., Thompson S. (1988) The structure of discourse and 'subordination'. In: Haiman J., Thompson S. (eds) Clause combining in grammar and discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 275-329
23. J. Moore M. Pollack 1992 A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis Computational Linguistics 18 4 537 544
24. Moser, M., & Moore, J. (1995). Using discourse analysis and automatic text generation to study discourse cue usage. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Empirical Methods in Discourse Interpretation and Generation, pp. 92-98.
25. Müller C., Strube M. (2006) Multi-level annotation of linguistic data with MMAX2. In: Braun S., Kohn K., Mukherjee J. (eds) Corpus technology and language pedagogy. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp 197-214
26. O'Donnell, M. (2000). RSTTool 2.4-a markup tool for rhetorical structure theory. In Proceedings of the International Natural Language Generation Conference (pp. 253-256). Mizpe Ramon/Israel.
27. Poesio, M. (2004). The MATE/GNOME proposals for anaphoric annotation, revisited. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL '04 Workshop. Cambridge/MA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
28. M. Poesio R. Stevenson B. di Eugenio J. Hitzeman 2004 Centering: A parametric theory and its instantiations Computational Linguistics 30 3 309 363
29. L. Polanyi 1988 A formal model of the structure of discourse Journal of Pragmatics 12 601 638
30. Prasad, R., Miltsakaki, E., Joshi, A., & Webber, B. (2004). Annotation and data mining of the Penn discourse Treebank. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation. Barcelona.
31. Redeker, G., & Egg, M. (2006). Says who? On the treatment of speech attributions in discourse structure. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Constraints in Discourse. Maynooth University/Ireland.
32. Sanders T., Spooren W. (1999) Communicative intentions and coherence relations. In: Sanders T., Schilperoord J., Spooren W. (eds) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Benjamins, Amsterdam
33. T. Sanders W. Spooren L. Noordman 1992 Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations Discourse Processes 15 1 35
34. Schmidt T. (2004) EXMARaLDA-ein System zur computergestützten Diskurstranskription. In: Mehler A., Lobin H. (eds) Automatische Textanalyse. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 203-218
35. Schmitt H. (2000) Zur Illokutionsanalyse monologischer Texte. Peter Lang, Frankfurt
36. J.R. Searle 1976 A classification of illocutionary acts Language in Society 5 1 23
37. Stede M. (2004) Kontrast im Diskurs. In: Blühdorn H., Breindl E., Wassner H. (eds) Brücken schlagen. Grundlagen der Konnektorensemantik. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 255-286
38. Stede M. (2008) RST revisited: Disentangling nuclearity. In: Fabricius-Hansen C., Ramm W. (eds) 'Subordination' versus 'coordination' in sentence and text. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
39. Stede, M., & Heintze, S. (2004). Machine-assisted rhetorical structure annotation. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (pp. 425-431). Geneva.
40. M. Taboada W. Mann 2006 Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead Discourse Studies 8 4 423 459
41. Toulmin S. (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
42. van Dijk T. (1977) Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. Klett, London, NY
43. B. Webber M. Stone A. Joshi A. Knott 2003 Anaphora and discourse Structure Computational Linguistics 29 4 545 587
44. F. Wolf E. Gibson 2005 Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based study Computational Linguistics 31 2 249 287