Electromyographic response is altered during robotic surgical training with augmented feedback

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 71-76

  Judkins, Timothy N ^a   Oleynikov, Dmitry ^b   Stergiou, Nick ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented feedback; Electromyography; Robotic surgery; Training

Indexed keywords

AUGMENTED FEEDBACK; BEFORE AND AFTER; DO-MAINS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC RESPONSES; FREQUENCY BAND WIDTHS; GRIP FORCES; MOTOR UNITS; MUSCULAR ACTIVATIONS; PHYSIOLOGICAL DEMANDS; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES; ROBOTIC SURGERY; ROBOTIC SYSTEMS; SPEED FEEDBACKS; SURGICAL TASKS; SURGICAL TRAININGS; TRAINING; VISUAL FEEDBACKS;

BIOFEEDBACK; BIOMECHANICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; MUSCLE; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; SPEED; SURGERY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

FREQUENCY RESPONSE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MUSCLE EXCITATION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; MUSCLE FORCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TIME; VELOCITY;

ADULT; BIOFEEDBACK (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 58149288214     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.039     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Basmajian J.V., and De Luca C.J. Muscles Alive: their Functions Revealed by Electromyography (1985), Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD
2. Berguer R., Rab G.T., Abu-Ghaida H., Alarcon A., and Chung J. A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surgical Endoscopy 11 2 (1997) 139-142
3. Berguer R., Smith W.D., and Chung Y.H. Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 15 10 (2001) 1204-1207
4. Bonato P., Roy S.H., Knaflitz M., and Luca C.J.D. Time-frequency parameters of the surface myoelectric signal for assessing muscle fatigue during cyclic dynamic contractions. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 48 7 (2001) 745-753
5. Farina D., Fosci M., and Merletti R. Motor unit recruitment strategies investigated by surface EMG variables. Journal of Applied Physiology 92 (2002) 235-247
6. Farina D., Merletti R., and Enoka R.M. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. Journal of Applied Physiology 96 (2004) 1486-1495
7. Hashizume M., Shimada M., Tomikawa M., Ikeda Y., Takahashi I., Abe R., Koga F., Gotoh N., Konish K., Maehara S., and Sugimachi K. Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surgical Endoscopy 16 (2002) 1187-1191
8. Hemal A.K., Srinivas M., and Charles A.R. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. Journal of Endourology 15 5 (2001) 499-503
9. Hubens G., Coveliers H., Balliu L., Ruppert M., and Vaneerdeweg W. A performance study comparing manual and robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surgical Endoscopy 17 10 (2003) 1595-1599
10. Judkins T.N., Oleynikov D., Narazaki K., and Stergiou N. Robotic surgery and training: electromyographic correlates of robotic laparoscopic training. Surgical Endoscopy 20 5 (2006) 824-829
11. Judkins T.N., Oleynikov D., and Stergiou N. Real-time augmented feedback benefits robotic laparoscopic training. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 119 (2006) 243-248
12. Judkins T.N., Oleynikov D., and Stergiou N. Enhanced robotic surgical training using augmented visual feedback. Surgical Innovation 15 1 (2008) 59-68
13. Judkins T.N., Oleynikov D., and Stergiou N. Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks. Surgical Endoscopy (2008) (Epub ahead of print)
14. Komi P.V., and Tesch P. EMG frequency spectrum, muscle structure, and fatigue during dynamic contractions in man. European Journal of Applied Physiology 42 1 (1979) 41-50
15. Matern U., Kuttler G., Giebmeyer C., Waller P., and Faist M. Ergonomic aspects of five different types of laparoscopic instrument handles under dynamic conditions with respect to specific laparoscopic tasks: an electromyographic-based study. Surgical Endoscopy 18 8 (2004) 1231-1241
16. McClure N., Gallagher A.G., McGuigan J., Ritchie K., and Sheehy N.P. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in endoscopic skill acquisition. Gynaecological Endoscopy 6 Supplement 2 (1997) 90
17. Munz Y., Moorthy K., Dosis A., Hernandez J., Bann S.D., Bello F., Martin S., Darzi A., and Rockall T. The benefits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models. Surgical Endoscopy 18 4 (2004) 611-616
18. Prasad S.M., Maniar H.S., Soper N.J., Damiano R.J., and Klingensmith M.E. The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. American Journal of Surgery 183 6 (2002) 702-707
19. Quick N.E., Gillete J.C., Shapiro R., Adrales G.L., Gerlach D., and Park A.E. The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 17 (2003) 462-465
20. Sarle R., Tewari A., Shrivastava A., Peabody J., and Menon M. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. Journal of Endourology 18 1 (2004) 63-67
21. Wenderoth N., Bock O., and Krohn R. Learning a new bimanual coordination pattern is influenced by existing attractors. Motor Control 6 (2002) 166-182