Superuniversality in phase-ordering disordered ferromagnets

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 22, 2008, Pages

  Henkel, Malte ^a   Pleimling, Michel ^b  

^a INSTITUT JEAN LAMOUR   (France)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149271051     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.224419     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. L. C. E. Struik, Physical Ageing in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978).
2. L. F. Cugliandolo, in Slow Relaxation and Non equilibrium Dynamics in Condensed Matter, edited by, J.-L. Barrat,,, J. Dalibard,,, J. Kurchan,, and, M. V. Feigel'man, (Springer, New York, 2003).
3. E. Vincent, in Ageing and the Glass Transition, Springer Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 716, edited by, M. Henkel,,, M. Pleimling,, and, R. Sanctuary, (Springer, Heidelberg, 2007), p. 7.
4. A. J. Bray, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994). 10.1080/00018739400101505
5. O. Dauchot, in Ageing and the Glass Transition, Springer Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 716, edited by, M. Henkel,,, M. Pleimling,, and, R. Sanctuary, (Springer, Heidelberg, 2007), p. 161.
6. C. Godrèche and J.-M. Luck, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 1589 (2002). 10.1088/0953-8984/14/7/316
7. C. Chamon, L. F. Cugliandold, and H. Yoshino, J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P01006. 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/01/P01006
8. C. Chamon and L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P07022. 10.1088/1742-5468/2007/07/P07022
9. G. F. Mazenko, Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 2006), Chap..
10. A. Picone and M. Henkel, Nucl. Phys. B 688, 217 (2004). 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.028
11. W. Zippold, R. Kühn, and H. Horner, Eur. Phys. J. B 13, 531 (2000).
12. A. Andreanov and A. Lefèvre, Europhys. Lett. 76, 919 (2006). 10.1209/epl/i2006-10352-9
13. D. A. Huse and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2708 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.2708
14. Z. W. Lai, G. F. Mazenko, and O. T. Valls, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9481 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.9481
15. D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 373 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.373
16. A. J. Bray and K. Humayun, J. Phys. A 24, L1185 (1991). 10.1088/0305-4470/24/19/010
17. S. Puri, D. Chowdhuri, and N. Parekh, J. Phys. A 24, L1087 (1991). 10.1088/0305-4470/24/18/005
18. H. Hayakawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 2492 (1991). 10.1143/JPSJ.60.2492
19. T. Iwai and H. Hayakawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62, 1583 (1993). 10.1143/JPSJ.62.1583
20. B. Biswal, S. Puri, and D. Chowdhury, Physica A 229, 72 (1996). 10.1016/0378-4371(95)00467-X
21. C. Aron, C. Chamon, L. F. Cugliandolo, and M. Picco, J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P05016. 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/05/P05016
22. M. Henkel, Nucl. Phys. B 641, 405 (2002). 10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00540-0
23. M. Henkel and M. Pleimling, Phys. Rev. E 68, 065101 (R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.065101
24. M. Henkel, A. Picone, and M. Pleimling, Europhys. Lett. 68, 191 (2004). 10.1209/epl/i2004-10180-y
25. E. Lorenz and W. Janke, Europhys. Lett. 77, 10003 (2007). 10.1209/0295-5075/77/10003
26. M. Henkel and F. Baumann, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P07015. 10.1088/1742-5468/2007/07/P07015
27. R. Paul, S. Puri, and H. Rieger, Europhys. Lett. 68, 881 (2004). 10.1209/epl/i2004-10276-4
28. H. Rieger, G. Schehr, and R. Paul, Prog. Theor. Phys. 157, 111 (2005). 10.1143/PTPS.157.111
29. R. Paul, S. Puri, and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. E 71, 061109 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061109
30. G. Schehr and P. Le Doussal, Europhys. Lett. 71, 290 (2005) 10.1209/epl/i2005-10074-6
31. G. Schehr and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. B 71, 184202 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.184202
32. M. Henkel and M. Pleimling, Europhys. Lett. 76, 561 (2006). 10.1209/epl/i2006-10311-6
33. A. Sicilia, J. J. Arenzon, A. J. Bray, and L. F. Cugliandolo, Europhys. Lett. 82, 10001 (2008). 10.1209/0295-5075/82/10001
34. R. Paul, G. Schehr, and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. E 75, 030104 (R) (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.030104
35. A. Barrat, Phys. Rev. E 57, 3629 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.3629
36. Indeed, if we take ε=2, then for T≳0.6 notable finite-time corrections to simple aging are seen, which may be accounted for by including a finite-time correction term (Refs.). C (t,s) = FC (t/s) - s- b′ GC (t/s) and a new correction exponent b′ >0.
37. If one uses a scaling form C (t,s) =C [(t-s) s-μ], it can be shown that the superaging case μ>1 is incompatible with basic requirements from probability theory.
38. J. Kurchan, Phys. Rev. E 66, 017101 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.017101
39. M. Henkel and M. Pleimling, in Rugged Free-energy Landscapes: Common Computational Approaches in Spin Glasses, Structural Glasses, and Biological Macromolecules, Springer Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 736, edited by, W. Janke, (Springer, Heidelberg, 2007), p. 107.
40. M. Henkel and M. Pleimling, Europhys. Lett. 69, 524 (2005). 10.1209/epl/i2004-10381-4
41. J.-P. Bouchaud, in Soft and Fragile Matter, edited by, M. E. Cates, and, M. R. Evans, (IOP, Bristol, 2000), p. 285.
42. M. Henkel, M. Paeßens, and M. Pleimling, Europhys. Lett. 62, 664 (2003). 10.1209/epl/i2003-00425-9
43. A. Röthlein, F. Baumann, and M. Pleimling, Phys. Rev. E 74, 061604 (2006) 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.061604
44. A. Röthlein, F. Baumann, and M. Pleimling, Phys. Rev. E 76, 019901 (E) (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.019901
45. C. Yeung, M. Rao, and R. C. Desai, Phys. Rev. E 53, 3073 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.3073
46. The consideration of the spatiotemporal response allows for a much more demanding test of dynamical scaling than is possible by merely considering the autoresponse alone. Our results hence strengthen the conclusions of a simple power-law scaling in the disordered Ising model reached earlier (Refs.).
47. It is conceivable that our finding of a distinct behavior for ε=2 might be a sort of borderline behavior when going from ferromagnets to frustrated magnet.