Symmetry-based determination of space-time functions in nonequilibrium growth processes

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2006, Pages

  Röthlein, Andreas ^a   Baumann, Florian ^a,b   Pleimling, Michel ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b INSTITUT JEAN LAMOUR   (France)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINEAR EQUATIONS; MATERIALS SCIENCE; RANDOM PROCESSES;

NONEQUILIBRIUM GROWTH; SCALING FUNCTIONS; SPACE TIME FUNCTIONS; UNIVERSALITY CLASSES;

GRAIN GROWTH;

EID: 33846339766     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.061604     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. P. Meakin, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(93)90047-H 235, 189 (1993).
2. T. Halpin-Healy and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(94)00087-J 254, 215 (1995).
3. A.-L. Barábasi and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
4. J. Krug, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 10.1080/00018739700101498 46, 139 (1997).
5. J. Krug, in Scale Invariance, Interfaces, and Non-Equilibrium Dynamics, edited by, A. McKane, (Plenum, New York, 1995), p. 25.
6. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435 49, 435 (1977).
7. U. C. Täuber, Critical Dynamics-A field Theory Approach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Behaviour (Cambridge University Press), in preparation (see also http://www.phys.vt.edu/tauber/utaeuber.html).
8. Y.-K. Yu, N.-N. Pang, and T. Halpin-Healy, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.5111 50, 5111 (1994).
9. S. F. Edwards and D. R. Wilkinson, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A PRLAAZ 1364-5021 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.889 381, 17 (1982).
10. M. Giesen, Prog. Surf. Sci. PSSFBP 0079-6816 10.1016/S0079-6816(00)00021- 6 68, 1 (2001).
11. D. B. Dougherty, I. Lyubinetsky, T. L. Einstein, and E. D. Williams, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.235422 70, 235422 (2004).
12. D. B. Dougherty, C. Tao, O. Bondarchuk, W. G. Cullen, E. D. Williams, M. Constantin, C. Dasgupta, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.021602 71, 021602 (2005).
13. B. Schmittmann, G. Pruessner, and H. K. Janssen, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/39/25/S27 39, 8183 (2006).
14. W. W. Mullins, in Metal Surfaces: Structure, Energetics and Kinetics (Am. Soc. Metal, Metals Park, Ohio, 1963), p. 17.
15. D. E. Wolf and J. Villain, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 13, 389 (1990).
16. P.-M. Lam and F. Family, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.4854 44, 4854 (1991).
17. L. Golubovíc and R. Bruinsma, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.321 66, 321 (1991).
18. S. Das Sarma and P. Tamborenea, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.325 66, 325 (1991).
19. O. Bondarchuk, D. B. Dougherty, M. Degawa, E. D. Williams, M. Constantin, C. Dasgupta, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045426 71, 045426 (2005).
20. A. Brú, J. M. Pastor, I. Fernaud, I. Brú, S. Melle, and C. Berenguer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4008 81, 4008 (1998).
21. C. Escudero, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.020902 73, 020902 (R) (2006).
22. F. Family and T. Vicsek, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/ 18/2/005 18, L75 (1985).
23. A. Picone and M. Henkel, Nucl. Phys. B NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2004.03.028 688, 217 (2004).
24. M. Henkel, M. Pleimling, C. Godrèche, and J.-M. Luck, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.265701 87, 265701 (2001).
25. M. Henkel, Nucl. Phys. B NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00540-0 641, 405 (2002).
26. M. Henkel, A. Picone, and M. Pleimling, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 68, 191 (2004).
27. M. Henkel and M. Pleimling, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.065101 68, 065101 (R) (2003).
28. F. Baumann and M. Pleimling, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/39/9/001 39, 1981 (2006).
29. F. Baumann, S. Stoimenov, and M. Henkel, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/39/16/001 39, 4095 (2006).
30. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00219-3 368, 549 (2002).
31. S. Lübeck, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B IJPBEV 0217-9792 10.1142/S0217979204027748 18, 3977 (2004).
32. P. Calabrese and A. Gambassi, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/38/18/R01 38, R133 (2005).
33. F. Family, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/19/8/006 19, L441 (1986).
34. P. Meakin and R. Jullien, J. Phys. (Paris) JOPQAG 0302-0738 48, 1651 (1987).
35. D. Liu and M. Plischke, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.4781 38, 4781 (1988).
36. S. Pal and D. P. Landau, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/S0378- 4371(98)00641-4 267, 406 (1999).
37. S. Pal, D. P. Landau, and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.68.021601 68, 021601 (2003).
38. F. Baumann and M. Henkel, e-print cond-mat/0611652.
39. The response function 8, which results from a perturbation in the flux, can be viewed as the response of the system to the noise itself.
40. This assumption is also important in connection with the symmetry based approach presented in this paper. A nonvanishing intial average of h (x,0) would lead to modifications.
41. J. Krug, H. Kallabis, S. N. Majumdar, S. J. Cornell, A. J. Bray, and C. Sire, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.2702 56, 2702 (1997).
42. C. R. Hagen, Phys. Rev. D PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.5.377 5, 377 (1972).
43. U. Niederer, Helv. Phys. Acta HPACAK 0018-0238 45, 802 (1972).
44. S. Lie, Arch. Math. Nat. vid. (Kristiania) 8, 328 (1882).
45. H. A. Kastrup, Nucl. Phys. NUPHA7 0029-5582 7, 545 (1978).
46. E. M. Wright, J. Lond. Math. Soc. JLMSAK 0024-6107 10, 287 (1935);
47. E. M. Wright, J. Lond. Math. Soc. JLMSAK 0024-6107 27, 256 (1952), erratum.
48. E. M. Wright, Proc. London Math. Soc. PLMTAL 46, 389 (1940).
49. M. Henkel, T. Enss, and M. Pleimling J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 39, L589 (2006).
50. P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.8.423 8, 423 (1973).
51. H. K. Janssen, Z. Phys. B ZPBBDJ 0340-224X 10.1007/BF01316547 23, 377 (1976).
52. V. Bargmann, Ann. Math. ANMAAH 0003-486X 59, 1 (1954).
53. F. D. A. Aarão Reis, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01029-4 316, 250 (2002).
54. D. D. Vvedensky, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.025102 67, 025102 (R) (2003).
55. M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.889 56, 889 (1986).
56. Z.-W. Lai and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2348 66, 2348 (1991).
57. We follow here the procedure used in in the context of phase ordering kinetics.
58. M. Pleimling and A. Gambassi, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.180401 71, 180401 (R) (2005).
59. H. Hinrichsen, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. ZZZZZZ 1742-5468 (2006) L06001.
60. E. Lippiello, F. Corberi, and M. Zannetti, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.041113 74, 041113 (2006).
61. One can show that this is justified because of the regularity assumption for u→0. It also follows from the regularity assumption that a term of the type n Fn δ(n) (u) needs not to be included.