Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory

NeuroReport

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 81-86

  Chen, Youzhen ^a,b   Huang, Xiting ^b   Jackson, Todd ^c   Yang, Hongsheng ^b  

^a FUJIAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Event based prospective memory; Event related potentials; Target cues; Task interference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149252167     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32831ac700     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Harris JE. Remembering to do things: a forgotten topic. In: Harris JE, Morris PE, editors. Everyday memory, actions, and absent-mindedness. London: Academic Press; 1984. pp. 71-92.
2. Hicks JL, Marsh RL, Cook GI. Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. J Mem Lang 2005; 53:430-444.
3. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000; 14:112-144.
4. Einstein GO, McDaniel MA, Thomas R, Mayfield S, Shank H, Morrisette N, Breneiser J. Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. J Exp Psychol Gen 2005; 134:327-342.
5. Smith RE. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. J Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem, Cogn 2003; 29:347-361.
6. Smith RE, Bayen UJ. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. J Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem, Cogn 2004; 30:756-777.
7. Marsh RL, Hicks JL, Cook Gl, Hansen JS, Pallos AL. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. J Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem, Cogn 2003; 29:861-870.
8. Ellis J, Milne A. Retrieval cue specificity and the realization of delayed intentions. Q J Exp Psychol: Hum Exp Psychol 1996; 49:862-887.
9. Mäntylä T. Priming effects in PM. Memory 1993; 1:203-218.
10. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in PM. Memory 1993; 1:23-41.
11. Burgess PW, Quayle A, Frith CD. Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography. Neuropsychologia 2001; 29:545-555.
12. Chen YZ, Huang XT, Yang HS, Ren GF, Chen YG, Yue CZ. Task interference from event-based prospective memory: an ERPs study. Neuroreport 2007; 18:1951-1955.
13. Chen YZ, Huang XT. Cognitive and neural mechanisms of prospective memory. Prog Biochem Biophys 2007; 34 (Suppl 2):37.
14. Simons JS, Schölvinck ML, Gilbert SJ, Frith CD, Burgess PW. Differential components of prospective memory? Evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44:1388-1397.
15. West R, Bowry R, Krompinger J. The effects of working memory demands on the neural correlates of prospective memory. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44:197-207.
16. Smith RE, Hunt RR, McVay JC, McConnell MD. The cost of event-based PM: salient target events. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007; 33:734-746.
17. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO, Rendell PG. The puzzle of inconsistent age-related declines in prospective memory: a multiprocess explanation. In: Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO, editors. Prospective memory: cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2008. pp. 139-158.