Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?

BMC Public Health

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Van Teijlingen, Edwin R ^a,b   Douglas, Flora ^a   Torrance, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRODUCTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL WORKER; UNITED KINGDOM; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CLINICAL GOVERNANCE; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 58149214622     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-396     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. J Wiggers R Sanson-Fisher, Evaluating Health Promotion Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes, Scott D, Weston R, 1998 126 145
2. Bureaucracy of ethics application. D Wald, British Medical Journal 2004 329 282 284 15284157 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.282
3. Health research buckles under burden of red tape. T Tysome, Times Higher Education Supplement 2007 1795 1
4. Research ethics in the UK: What can sociology learn from health? S Richardson M McMullan, Sociology 2007 41 6 1115 1132 10.1177/0038038507082318
5. The Data Protection Act (1998): Implications for health researchers. SA Redsell FM Cheater, Journal of Advanced Nursing 2001 35 4 508 513 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01867.x 11529949
6. N Pidgeon P Slovic R Kasperson (eds), The social amplification of risk Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003
7. On 'risk work': Professional discourse, accountability, and everyday action. T Horlick-Jones, Health, Risk & Society 2005 7 3 293 307 10.1080/13698570500229820
8. Primary care staff's views and practice related to routinely advising patients about physical activity. A questionnaire survey. F Douglas N Torrance ER van Teijlingen A Kerr S Meloni, BMC Public Health 2006 6 138 16719900 10.1186/1471-2458-6-138
9. Doctors revise Declaration of Helsinki. B Christie, British Medical Journal 2000 321 913 11030663 10.1136/bmj.321.7266.913
10. Ethical issues in health and social care research. R Stanley S McLaren, Ethics: Contemporary challenges in health and social care Bristol: Polity Press, Leathard A, McLaren S, 2007 35 52
11. Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth. C White, British Medical Journal 2005 331 281 288 16052022 10.1136/bmj.331.7511.281
12. M Reverby (eds), Tuskegee's Truth: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press 2000
13. World Medical Association, The Declaration of Helsinki Paragraph B 13, Helsinki 2007 http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm
14. A novel framework for reflecting on the functioning of research ethics review panels. C MacDuff A McKie S Martindale AM Rennie B West S Wilcock, Nursing Ethics 2007 14 1 99 116 10.1177/0969733007071361 17334174
15. Bureaucracy of ethics applications. D Wald, British Medical Journal 2004 329 282 284 15284157 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.282
16. Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost? K Jamrozik, British Medical Journal 2004 329 286 287 15284159 10.1136/bmj.329. 7460.286
17. Clinical Research Under the Cosh Again. C Warlow, British Medical Journal 2004 329 241 242 15284124 10.1136/bmj.329.7460.241
18. Multicentre Research Ethics Committees: Has the cure been worse than the disease? KG Alberti, British Medical Journal 2000 320 1157 58 10784526 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1157
19. Rationalising public participation in the health services: the case of research ethics committees. S Dyer, Health & Place 2004 10 339 348 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.08.004 15491894
20. Why do we have ethics committees? COREC, COREC http://www.nres.npsa.nhs. uk/aboutus/purpose-of-recs/ 5006820
21. The implication of distinguishing research from anything. J Reynolds N Crichton, Critical Public Health 2007 17 289 292 10.1080/09581590701769539
22. Ethics review roulette: What can we learn? P Glasziou I Chalmers, British Medical Journal 2004 328 121 122 14726317 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.121
23. Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees. C Gilbert KWM Fulford C Parker, British Medical Journal 1989 299 1437 9 2514829
24. The trouble with ethics committees. TW Meade, J R Coll Physicians Lond 1994 28 2 102 4 7802766
25. Ethics committees: impediments to research or guardians of ethical standards? A While, BMJ 1995 311 7006 661 7549635
26. Local research ethics committee approval for a national study in Scotland. KW Ah-See J Mackenzie NS Thakker AGD Maran, J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998 43 5 303 305 9803097
27. A tale of two studies: research governance issues arising from two ethnographic investigations into the organisation of health and social care. B Hannigan D Allen, International Journal of Nursing Studies 2003 4 685 695 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00111-6
28. Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population. HJT Ward SN Cousens B Smith-Bathgate M Leitch D Everington RG Will PG Smith, British Medical Journal 2004 329 277 279 15284154 10.1136/bmj.329. 7460.277
29. The impact of research governance in health care and higher education organization. L Howarth R Kneafsey, Journal of Advanced Nursing 2005 49 6 675 683 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03341.x 15737227
30. Is "inconsistency" in Research Ethics Committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. EL Angell CJ Jackson RE Ashcroft A Bryman K Windridge M Dixon-Woods, Clinical Ethics 2007 2 92 99 10.1258/147775007781029500
31. The midwife, the coincidence and the hypothesis. D Barker, British Medical Journal 2003 327 1428 1430 14684636 10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1428
32. The midwife, the coincidence and the hypothesis. D Barker, British Medical Journal 2003 327 1430 14684637 10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1428
33. M Redfern J Keeling E Powell, The report of the Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry (Report of House of Commons London: The Stationary Office 2001
34. Confronting the Anti-Democrats: The Unethical Nature of Ethical Regulation in Social Science. R Dingwall, Medical Sociology online 2006 1 51 58 http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org
35. Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees. MA Redshaw A Harris JD Baum, Journal of Medical Ethics 1996 22 78 82 8731532 10.1136/jme.22.2.78
36. The ethics of research ethics committees. J Nicholl, British Medical Journal 2000 320 1217 10784570 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1217
37. A tale of two studies: research governance issues arising from two ethnographic investigations into the organisation of health and social care. B Hannigan D Allen, Int J Nurs Stud 2003 40 7 685 695 10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00111- 6 12965160
38. Comparisons of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. H Hearnshaw, British Medical Journal 2004 328 140 141 14726341 10.1136/bmj.328.7432.140
39. Research ethics in the UK: What can sociology learn from health? S Richardson M McMullan, Sociology 2007 41 6 1115 1132 10.1177/0038038507082318
40. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study. J Tully N Ninis R Booy R Viner, British Medical Journal 2000 320 1179 1182 10784541 10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1179
41. Research will be impeded. R Doll, British Medical Journal 2001 323 1421 22
42. Abortion and breast cancer: a case-control record linkage study. MJ Goldacre LM Kurina V Seagrott D Yeates, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2001 55 336 37 10.1136/jech.55.5.336
43. Seeking informen consent: Reflections on research practice. CH Sin, Sociology 2005 39 2 283 10.1177/0038038505050539
44. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. National Health and Medical Research Council, Canbarra: Australian Government 2007 http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/PUBLICATIONS/synopses/_files/e72.pdf
45. Ethics approval for a national postal survey: a recent experience. C Middle A Johnson T Petty L Sims A MacFarlane, British Medical Journal 1995 311 659 60 7549633
46. Is governance now inhibiting research? S Holmes, British Journal of Health Care Management 2004 10 10 309
47. Reply to Robert Dingwall's Plenary 'Confronting the Anti-Democrats: The Unethical Nature of Ethical Regulation in Social Science. E Teijlingen van, Medical Sociology online 2006 1 59 60 http://www.medicalsociologyonline.org/ archives/issue1/current.html
48. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? R Barbour, British Medical Journal 2001 322 1115 7 11337448 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
49. The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. R Dingwall, 21st Century Society 2008 3 1 1 12