The extraction of 3D shape from texture and shading in the human brain

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 2416-2438

  Georgieva, Svetlana S ^a   Todd, James T ^b   Peeters, Ronald ^c   Orban, Guy A ^a  

^a KU LEUVEN UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

3D shape; FMRI; Human; Shading; Texture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUMINANCE; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL STIMULATION; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; METHODOLOGY; MONOCULAR VISION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SACCADES; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149183261     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn002     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Amedi A, Jacobson G, Hendler T, Malach R, Zohary E. 2002. Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex. 12:1202-1212.
2. Andersen RA, Buneo CA. 2002. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 25:189-220.
3. Bartels A, Zeki S. 2000. The architecture of the colour centre in the human visual brain: new results and a review. Eur J Neurosci. 12:172-193.
4. Belhumeur PN, Kriegman D, Yuille A. 1999. The bas-relief ambiguity. Int J Comput Vis. 23:149-168.
5. Binkofski F, Buccino G, Posse S, Seitz RJ, Rizzolatti G, Freund HJ. 1999. A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 11:3276-3286.
6. Blake A, Bulthoff HH, Sheinberg D. 1993. Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics. Vision Res. 33:1723-1737.
7. Boyaci H, Fang F, Murray SO, Kersten D. 2007. Responses to lightness variations in early human visual cortex. Curr Biol. 17:989-993.
8. Claeys KG, Dupont P, Cornette L, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, De Schutter E, Orban GA. 2004. Color discrimination involves ventral and dorsal stream visual areas. Cereb Cortex. 14:803-822.
9. Cornelis EVK, van Doorn AJ, de Ritter H. 2003. Mirror-reflecting the shape of an object: what happens to the shape percept? Percept Psychophys. 65:1110-1125.
10. Denys K, Vanduffel W, Fize D, Nelissen K, Peuskens H, Van Essen D, Orban GA. 2004. The processing of visual shape in the cerebral cortex of human and nonhuman primates: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 24:2551-2565.
11. Durand JB, Nelissen K, Joly O, Wardak C, Todd JT, Norman JF, Janssen P, Vanduffel W, Orban GA. 2007. Anterior regions of monkey parietal cortex process visual 3D shape. Neuron. 55:493-505.
12. Faillenot I, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Orban GA. 2001. Orientation discrimination of objects and gratings compared: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 13:585-596.
13. Fize D, Vanduffel W, Nelissen K, Denys K, Chef d'Hotel C, Faugeras O, Orban GA. 2003. The retinotopic organization of primate dorsal V4 and surrounding areas: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in awake monkeys. J Neurosci. 23:7395-7406.
14. Fleming RW, Torralba A, Adelson EH. 2004. Specular reflections and the perception of shape. J Vision. 4:798-820.
15. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, Worsley KJ. 1999. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage. 10:385-396.
16. Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE. 2005. Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage. 25:661-667.
17. Gilaie-Dotan S, Ullman S, Kushnir T, Malach R. 2001. Shape-selective stereo processing in human object-related visual areas. Hum Brain Mapp. 15:67-79.
18. Grefkes C, Weiss PH, Zilles K, Fink GR. 2002. Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: an fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron. 35:173-184.
19. Hanazawa A, Komatsu H. 2001. Influence of the direction of elemental luminance gradients on the responses of V4 cells to textured surfaces. J Neurosci. 21:4490-4497.
20. Henson RNA, Penny WD. 2003. ANOVAs and SPM. Technical report. Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience.
21. Humphrey GK, Goodale MA, Bowen CV, Gati JS, Vilis T, Rutt BK, Menon RS. 1997. Differences in perceived shape from shading correlate with activity in early visual areas. Curr Biol. 7:144-147.
22. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2002. Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extras-triate visual areas. Neuropsychologia. 40:1706-1714.
23. Janssen P, Pareto D, Peuskens H, Sunaert S, Vogels R, Orban GA. 2002. Higher order disparity sensitive regions in human cortex? An fMRI study. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 56:11.
24. Knill DC. 1998a. Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture. Vision Res. 38:2635-2656.
25. Knill DC. 1998b. Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: human and ideal observers compared. Vision Res. 38:1683-1711.
26. Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AD. 2004. Shape and shading. Vis Neurosci. 2:1090-1105.
27. Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ, Kappers AML, Todd JT. 2001. Ambiguity and the "Mental Eye" in pictorial relief. Perception. 30:431-448.
28. Kourtzi Z, Erb M, Grodd W, Bulthoff HH. 2003. Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. Cereb Cortex. 13:911-920.
29. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. 2000. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J Neurosci. 20:3310-3318.
30. Kovesi P. 1999. Image features from phase congruency. J Comput Vision Res. 1:1-28.
31. Lades M, Vorbruggen C, Buhmann J, Lange J, von der Malsburg C, Wurtz R, Konen W. 1993. Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans Comput. 42:300-311.
32. Lamme VA. 1995. The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. J Neurosci. 15:1605-1615.
33. Larsson J, Heeger DJ. 2006. Two retinotopic visual areas in human lateral occipital cortex. J Neurosci. 26:13128-13142.
34. Lee TS, Mumford D, Romero R, Lamme VA. 1998. The role of the primary visual cortex in higher level vision. Vision Res. 38:2429-2454.
35. Liu Y, Vogels R, Orban GA. 2004. Convergence of depth from texture and depth from disparity in macaque inferior temporal cortex. J Neurosci. 24:3795-3800.
36. Mendola JD, Dale AM, Fischl B, Liu AK, Tootell RB. 1999. The representation of illusory and real contours in human cortical visual areas revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 19:8560-8572.
37. Moore C, Engel SA. 2001. Neural response to perception of volume in the lateral occipital complex. Neuron. 29:277-286.
38. Murray SO, Kersten D, Olshausen BA, Schrater P, Woods DL. 2002. Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 22:15164-15169.
39. Murray SO, Olshausen BA, Woods DL. 2003. Processing shape, motion and three-dimensional shape-from-motion in the human cortex. Cereb Cortex. 13:508-516.
40. Nefs HT, Koenderink JJ, Kappers AML. 2006. Shape-from-shading for matte and glossy objects. Acta Psychol Amst. 121:297-316.
41. Norman JF, Todd JT, Orban GA. 2004. Perception of three-dimensional shape from specular highlights, deformations of shading, and other types of visual information. Psychol Sci. 15:565-570.
42. Norman JF, Todd JT, Phillips F. 1995. The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information. Percept Psychophys. 57:629-636.
43. Orban GA, Fize D, Peuskens H, Denys K, Nelissen K, Sunaert S, Todd J, Vanduffel W. 2003. Similarities and differences in motion processing between the human and macaque brain: evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 41:1757-1768.
44. Orban GA, Sunaert S, Todd JT, Van Hecke P, Marchal G. 1999. Human cortical regions involved in extracting depth from motion. Neuron. 24:929-940.
45. Penny WD, Holmes AP. 2003. Random effect analysis. In: Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan R, Price CJ, Zeki S, Ashburner J, Penny WD, editors. Human brain function. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press. p. 843-850.
46. Peuskens H, Claeys KG, Todd JT, Norman JF, Van Hecke P, Orban GA. 2004. Attention to 3-D shape, 3-D motion, and texture in 3-D structure from motion displays. J Cogn Neurosci. 16:665-682.
47. Press WA, Brewer AA, Dougherty RF, Wade AR, Wandell BA. 2001. Visual areas and spatial summation in human visual cortex. Vision Res. 41:1321-1332.
48. Sawamura H, Georgieva S, Vogels R, Vanduffel W, Orban GA. 2005. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptation and size invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys. J Neurosci. 25:4294-4306.
49. Shikata E, Hamzei F, Glauche V, Knab R, Dettmers C, Weiller C, Buchel C. 2001. Surface orientation discrimination activates caudal and anterior intraparietal sulcus in humans: an event-related fMRI study. J Neurophysiol. 85:1309-1314.
50. Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Marchal G, Orban GA. 1999. Motion-responsive regions of the human brain. Exp Brain Res. 127:355-370.
51. Taira M, Nose I, Inoue K, Tsutsui K. 2001. Cortical areas related to attention to 3D surface structures based on shading: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 14:959-966.
52. Todd JT. 2004. The perception of 3D shape. Trends Cogn Sci. 8:115-121.
53. Todd JT, Norman JF. 2003. The perception of 3D shape from multiple cues: are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Percept Psychophys. 65:31-47.
54. Todd JT, Oomes AH, Koenderink JJ, Kappers AM. 2004. The perception of doubly curved surfaces from anisotropic textures. Psychol Sci. 15:40-46.
55. Todd JT, Thaler L, Dijkstra TM. 2005. The effects of field of view on the perception of 3D slant from texture. Vision Res. 45:1501-1517.
56. Tsutsui K, Sakata H, Naganuma T, Taira M. 2002. Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science. 298:409-412.
57. Tyler CW, Likova LT, Kontsevich LL, Wade AR. 2006. The specificity of cortical region KO to depth structure. Neuroimage. 30:228-238.
58. Vanduffel W, Fize D, Mandeville JB, Nelissen K, Van Hecke P, Rosen BR, Tootell RB, Orban GA. 2001. Visual motion processing investigated using contrast agent-enhanced fMRI in awake behaving monkeys. Neuron. 32:565-577.
59. Vanduffel W, Fize D, Peuskens H, Denys K, Sunaert S, Todd JT, Orban GA. 2002. Extracting 3D from motion: differences in human and monkey intraparietal cortex. Science. 298:413-415.
60. Van Essen DC. 2005. A population-average, landmark-and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. Neuroimage. 28:635-662.
61. Van Oostende S, Sunaert S, Van Hecke P, Marchal G, Orban GA. 1997. The kinetic occipital (KO) region in man: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 7:690-701.
62. Welchman AE, Deubelius A, Conrad V, Bulthoff HH, Kourtzi Z. 2005. 3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 8:820-827. (Pubitemid 43085850)
63. Zenger-Landolt B, Heeger DJ. 2003. Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking. J Neurosci. 23:6884-6893.