메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

Registered Nurse Peer Evaluation in the Perioperative Setting

(1)  Gentry, Melanie B a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING; PEER REVIEW; PERIOPERATIVE NURSING; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750462792     PISSN: 00012092     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)63922-7     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (7)

References (8)
  • 2
    • 0034158394 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Peer evaluation in nurses' professional development: A pilot study to investigate the issues,"
    • Vuorinen R., Tarkka M., and Meretoja R. "Peer evaluation in nurses' professional development: A pilot study to investigate the issues,". Journal of Clinical Nursing 9 (March 2000) 273-281
    • (2000) Journal of Clinical Nursing , vol.9 , pp. 273-281
    • Vuorinen, R.1    Tarkka, M.2    Meretoja, R.3
  • 3
    • 0036129623 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Comparison of faculty, peer, self, and nurse assessment of obstetrics and gynecology residents,"
    • Davis J. "Comparison of faculty, peer, self, and nurse assessment of obstetrics and gynecology residents,". Obstetrics & Gynecology 99 (April 2002) 647-651
    • (2002) Obstetrics & Gynecology , vol.99 , pp. 647-651
    • Davis, J.1
  • 4
    • 27144489984 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Assessing professionalism in early medical education: Experience with peer evaluation and self evaluation in the gross anatomy course,"
    • Bryan R., et al. "Assessing professionalism in early medical education: Experience with peer evaluation and self evaluation in the gross anatomy course,". Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 34 (September 2005) 486-491
    • (2005) Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore , vol.34 , pp. 486-491
    • Bryan, R.1
  • 5
    • 20344362415 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Using a peer evaluation system to assess faculty performance and competence,"
    • Rosenbaum M., et al. "Using a peer evaluation system to assess faculty performance and competence,". Family Medicine 37 (June 2005) 429-433
    • (2005) Family Medicine , vol.37 , pp. 429-433
    • Rosenbaum, M.1
  • 6
    • 3242731136 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "A comparison of clinical teaching evaluations by resident and peer physicians,"
    • Beckman T., Lee M., and Mandrekar J. "A comparison of clinical teaching evaluations by resident and peer physicians,". Medical Teacher 26 (June 2004) 321-325
    • (2004) Medical Teacher , vol.26 , pp. 321-325
    • Beckman, T.1    Lee, M.2    Mandrekar, J.3
  • 7
    • 0035436403 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Performance appraisals: How valuable is peer review?"
    • Welch N. "Performance appraisals: How valuable is peer review?". The Canadian Nurse 97 (August 2001) 30-31
    • (2001) The Canadian Nurse , vol.97 , pp. 30-31
    • Welch, N.1
  • 8
    • 0035296499 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "Nurse practitioner peer review: Process and evaluation,"
    • Sheahan S., Simpson C., and Rayens M. "Nurse practitioner peer review: Process and evaluation,". Research 13 (March 2001) 140-145
    • (2001) Research , vol.13 , pp. 140-145
    • Sheahan, S.1    Simpson, C.2    Rayens, M.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.