Bonded exciplex formation: Electronic and stereoelectronic effects

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 112, Issue 50, 2008, Pages 13088-13094

  Wang, Yingsheng ^a   Haze, Olesya ^a   Dinnoeenzo, Joseph P ^a   Farid, Samir ^a   Farid, Ramy S ^b   Gould, Ian R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b SCHRÖDINGER INC   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE TRANSFER REACTIONS; EXCIPLEX; EXCIPLEXES; NOVEL CONCEPTS; QUENCHING RATE CONSTANTS; REACTION ENERGETICS; SINGLET EXCITED STATES; STEREOELECTRONIC EFFECTS; STERIC EFFECTS; VINYL PYRIDINES;

CHARGE TRANSFER; ETHERS; EXCITED STATES; ION EXCHANGE; OXYGEN; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; PYRIDINE; RATE CONSTANTS;

QUENCHING;

EID: 58149152850     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp8041445     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Wang, Y.; Haze, O.; Dinnocenzo, J. P.; Farid, S.; Farid, R.; Gould, I. R. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72. 6970.
2. Weller, A. Z. Phys. Chem. (Munich) 1982, 130, 129.
3. 3, eq 1) to the exciplex state is usually negligible.
4. Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Isr. J. Chem. 1970, 8, 259.
5. (a) Shaik. S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 3692.
6. (b) Pross. A.; Shaik, S. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16. 363.
7. (c) Shaik, S. S. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1985, 15, 197.
8. (d) Shaik, S. S. In New Theoretical Concepts for Understanding Organic Reactions: Bertrán, J., Csizmadia. I. G.. Eds.; NATO ASI Series; Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1989; Vol. C267, p 165.
9. (e) Shaik, S.; Shurki, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 586.
10. (f) Shaik, S. S.; Hiberty, P. C. A Chemist's Guide to Valence Bond Theory; Wiley: New York, 2008.
11. Glendening, E. D.; Badenhoop, J, K.; Reed, A. E.; Carpenter, J. E.; Bohmann, J. A.; Morales, C. M.; Weinhold, F. NBO 5.O.; Theoretical Chemistry Institute: University of Wisconsin, Madison, 2001.
12. For a literature summary regarding the assignment of the lowest ionic state of pyridine, see: Tsubouchi, M.; Suzuki, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 10897.
13. (a) Jacques, P.; Burget, D. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1992, 68, 165.
14. (b) Jacques, P.; Allonas, X. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1994, 78, 1.
15. Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds: Wiley: New York. 1994; pp 695-700.
16. (a) Lumbroso, H.; Bertin, D. M. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1970, 1728.
17. (b) Favini, G.; Raimondi, M.; Gandolfo, C. Spectrochim. Acta 1968, 24A, 207.
18. (c) Contreras, R. H.; Facelli, J. C.; de Kowalewski, D. G. Org. Magn. Reson. 1982, 20, 40.
19. (d) Blonski, W. J. P.; Hruska, F. E.: Wildman, T. A. Org. Magn. Reson. 1984, 22, 505.
20. (e) Contreras. R. H.; Beikofsky, R. R.; de Kowalewski, D. G.; Orendt, A. M.; Facelli, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 91.
21. Schmidt. R.; Shafii. F.; Schweitzer, C.; Abdel-Shafi, A. A.; Wilkinson, F. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 1811.
22. The reduction potential of 4-CNPy was determined vs 1-cyanonaphthalene by redox equilibration by using a method analogous to that previously described: Guirado, G.; Fleming, C. N.; Lingenfelter, T. G.; Williams, M. L.; Zuilhof, H.; Dinnocenzo, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14086.
23. (b) The reduction potential of 3-CNPy was determined from the value for 4-CNPy and the difference in eletrochemical reduction potentials reported previously: Loutfv, R. O.: Loutfv, R. O. Can. J. Chem. 1973, 51, 1169)
24. Based on the reported difference in oxidation between DCA and 9, 10-diphenylanthracene (DPA) of 0.57 V
25. (a) Clegg, A. D.; Rees, N. V.; Klymenko, O. V.; Coles, B. A; Compton. R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6185 and the oxidation potential reported for DPA of 1.18 V vs SCE in acetonitrile
26. (b) Sioda, R. E. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 2322.
27. The difference in oxidation potential for PS and PMeOS can be roughly approximated by the difference in the oxidation potentials of toluene and 4-methylanisole, which are 2.33 and 1.53 V vs SCE, respectively (ref 1 and. Suzuki, T.; Fujii, H.: Yamashita, Y.; Kabuto, C.; Tanaka, S.; Harasawa, M.: Mukai, T.; Mivashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114. 3034)
28. Farid, S.; Daly, R. C.; Moody, R. E.; Huang, W.-Y.; Reiser, A. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 4041.
29. Adapted with permission from ref 1. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society.
30. (a) Gould, I. R.; Young, R. H.; Mueller. L. J.; Farid, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8176.
31. (b) Gould. I. R.; Farid, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 6782.
32. (a) Smoluchowski, M. V. Phys. Z 1916, 17, 557.
33. (b) Smoluchowski, M. V. Phys. Z. 1916, 17, 583.
34. D = 3 Å.
35. (a) Eigen, M. Z. Phys. Chem. 1954, 1, 176.
36. A+D = 6 Å.
37. Cf. line 1 in Figure 4 for Δ G > 0.
38. Ratner, M. A.; Schatz, G. C. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics in Chemistry; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001; p 230.