Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: Pilot study

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 24-28

  Horiuchi, Akira ^a   Nakayama, Yoshiko ^b   Hidaka, Nao ^b   Ichise, Yasuyuki ^a   Kajiyama, Masashi ^a   Tanaka, Naoki ^a  

^a Showa Inan General Hospital   (Japan)

^b SHINSHU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD); High definition EGD; Ultrathin EGD

Indexed keywords

PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEDATION; VIDEOENDOSCOPY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

CONSCIOUS SEDATION; ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PROPOFOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149129519     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2008.00826.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bjorkman DJ, Popp JW Jr. Measuring the quality of endoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006 63 : S1 S2.
2. Dean R, Dua K, Massey B et al. A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1996 44 : 422 4.
3. Zaman A, Hapke R, Sahagun G et al. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998 93 : 1260 3.
4. Dumortier J, Ponchon T, Scoazec JY et al. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Feasibility and study on performance and tolerance. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1999 49 : 285 91.
5. Sorbi D, Gostout CJ, Henry J et al. Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: A comparative study. Gastroenterology 1999 117 : 1301 7.
6. Mulcahy HE, Riches A, Kiely M et al. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2001 33 : 311 16.
7. Garcia RT, Cello JP, Nguyen MH et al. Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: A multicenter randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2003 125 : 1606 12.
8. Sorbi D, Chak A. Unsedated EGD. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003 58 : 102 10.
9. Shaker R, Saeian K. Unsedated transnasal laryngo- esophagogastroduodenoscopy: An alternative to conventional endoscopy. Am. J. Med. 2001 111 (Suppl 8A 153S 156S.
10. Craig A, Hanlon J, Dent J, Schoeman M. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1999 49 : 292 6.
11. Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke R, Knigge K, Fennerty MB, Katon RM. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1999 49 : 279 84.
12. Wilkins T, Brewster A, Lammers J. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J. Fam. Pract. 2002 51 : 625 9.
13. Trevisani L, Cifala V, Sartoni S, Gilli G, Matarese G, Abbasciano V. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: A randomized trial. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007 13 : 906 11.
14. Yagi J, Adachi K, Arima N et al. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy 2005 37 : 1226 31.
15. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y. Unsedated ultrathin EGD by using a 5.2-mm-diameter videoscope: Evaluation of acceptability and diagnostic accuracy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006 64 : 868 73.
16. Birkner B, Fritz N, Schatke W, Hasford J. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: Does it work better through the nose? Endoscopy 2003 35 : 647 51.
17. Cohen LB, Hightower CD, Wood DA et al. Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: A prospective study using low dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004 59 : 795 803.
18. Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA et al. Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2005 129 : 1384 91.
19. Singer AJ, Thodes HC Jr. Determination of the minimally clinically significant difference on a patient visual analog satisfaction scale. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1998 5 : 1007 11.
20. Lieberman DA, Wuerker CK, Katon RM. Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation. Gastroenterology 1985 88 : 468 72.
21. Lazzaroni M, Bianchi Porro C. Preparation, premedication, and surveillance. Endoscopy 2005 37 : 101 9.
22. Lee YC, Lin JT, Chiu HM et al. Intraobserver and interobserver consistency for grading esophagitis with narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007 66 : 230 6.
23. Mori A, Fushimi N, Asano T et al. Cardiovascular tolerance in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: Prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and conventional oral procedures. Dig. Endosc. 2006 18 : 282 7.
24. Mori A, Ohashi N, Maruyama T et al. Cardiovascular tolerance in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an ultrathin scope: Prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and transoral procedures. Dig. Endosc. 2008 20 : 79 83.