Cardiovascular tolerance in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an ultrathin scope: Prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and transoral procedures

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 79-83

  Mori, Akihiro ^a   Ohashi, Noritsugu ^a   Maruyama, Takako ^a   Tatebe, Hideharu ^a   Sakai, Katsuhisa ^a   Shibuya, Takashi ^a   Inoue, Hiroshi ^a   Okuno, Masataka ^a  

^a Inuyama Chuo Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Cardiovascular tolerance; Complication; Nasal endoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD OXYGEN TENSION; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR PERFORMANCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPE; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PULSE RATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 40549116958     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2008.00780.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sharma VK, Nguyen CC, Crowell MD, Lieberman DA, de Garmo P, Fleischer DE. A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007 66 : 27 34.
2. Gandi S, Saidi F, Patel K et al. Cardiovascular complications after GI endoscopy: Occurrence and risks in a large hospital system. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004 60 : 679 85.
3. Yazawa K, Adachi W, Koide N et al. Changes in cardiopulmonary parameters during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with heart disease: Towards safer endoscopy. Endoscopy 2000 32 : 287 93.
4. Arrowsmith JB, Gerstman BB, Fleischer DE et al. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/US Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1991 37 : 421 7.
5. Saeian K. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: A safe and less costly alternative. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2002 4 : 213 17.
6. Dean R, Dua K, Massey B et al. A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1996 44 : 422 4.
7. Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F et al. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: Results with 1100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003 57 : 198 204.
8. Preiss C, Charton JP, Schumacher B et al. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD. Endoscopy 2003 35 : 641 6.
9. Yagi J, Adachi K, Arima N et al. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy 2005 37 : 1226 31.
10. Mori A, Fushimi N, Asano T et al. Cardiovascular tolerance in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: Prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and conventional oral procedures. Dig. Endosc. 2006 18 : 282 7.
11. Lieberman DA, Wuerker CK, Katon RM. Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation. Gastroenterology 1985 88 : 468 72.
12. Bradley C. Designing medical and educational intervention studies. Diabetes Care 1993 16 : 509 18.
13. Mori A, Ohashi N, Tatebe N et al. Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral procedures. J. Gastroenterol. (in press)
14. Botoman VA. Ultrathin crossroads: Is smaller better? Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003 57 : 377 80.
15. Bajaj JS, Shaker R. Another indication for transnasal, unsedated upper-GI endoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005 62 : 667 8.
16. ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report. Ultrathin endoscopes esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2000 51 : 786 92.
17. O'Conor KW, Jones S. Oxygen desaturation is common and clinically underappreciated during elective endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1990 36 : S2 4.
18. Holm C, Rosenberg J. Pulse oxymetry and supplemental oxygen during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A critical review. Endoscopy 1996 28 : 703 11.
19. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S et al. Complications of ERCP: A prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2004 60 : 721 31.
20. Mori A, Asano T, Maruyama T et al. Transnasal ERCP/ENBD using an ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscope. J. Gastroenterol. 2006 41 : 1237 8.