Soft methods for treating uncertainties: Applications in the field of environmental risks

Advances in Soft Computing

Volumn 48, Issue , 2008, Pages 16-26

  Guyonnet, Dominique ^a   Bellenfant, Gaël ^a   Bouc, Olivier ^a  

^a BRGM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149112637     PISSN: 16153871     EISSN: 18600794     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85027-4_3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baudrit, C., Guyonnet, D., Dubois, D.: Post-processing the hybrid method for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J. Envir. Eng. 131(12), 1750-1754 (2005)
2. Baudrit, C., Guyonnet, D., Dubois, D.: Joint propagation and exploitation of probabilistic and possibilistic information in risk assessment models. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14(5), 593-608 (2006)
3. Baudrit, C., Guyonnet, D., Dubois, D.: Joint propagation of variability and partial ignorance in a groundwater risk assessment. J. Contamin. Hydrol. 93, 72-84 (2007)
4. CEC, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending. Directive 2004/35/EC, COM 2006/0086 of the Commission of the European Communities, Brussels (2006)
5. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertaint. Plenum Press, New York (1988)
6. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: When upper probabilities are possibility measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 49, 65-74 (1992)
7. Ferson, S.: What Monte Carlo methods cannot do. Human Ecol. Risk Assess 2, 990-1007 (1996)
8. Ferson, S., Ginzburg, L.R.: Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 54, 133-144 (1996)
9. Guyonnet, D., Bourgine, B., Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Côme, B., Chilès, J.P.: Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J. Envir. Eng. 129, 68-78 (2003)
10. Hurwicz, L.: Optimality criteria for decision making under ignorance. Cowles Commission discussion paper, Statistics No. 370 (1951)
11. Jaffray, J.-Y.: Application of linear utility theory for belief functions. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Saitta, L., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 1988. LNCS, vol. 313, pp. 1-8. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)
12. Jaffray, J.-Y.: Dynamic decision making with belief functions. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)
13. Kendall, D.G.: Foundations of a theory of random sets. In: Harding, E.F., Kendall, D.G. (eds.) Stochastic Geometry, pp. 322-376. Wiley, New York (1974)
14. McNab, W., Rice, D., Bear, J., Ragaini, R., Tuckfield, C., Oldenburg, C.: Historical case analysis of chlorinated volatile organic compound plumes. Report UCRL-AR-133361, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, USA (1999)
15. OJEC, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000, establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, 22 December 2000, L327 (2000)
16. OJEC, Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste. Official Journal of the European Communities, 27 April 2006, L114 (2006)
17. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
18. WHO, Quality Directives for Drinking Water, Vol 1: Recommendations, 2nd edn. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland (1994)
19. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 3-28 (1978)