Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 44-49

  Palotie, Ulla ^a,b   Vehkalahti, Miira M ^b  

^a City of Helsinki   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Dental practices; Dentist's gender; Private sector; Public sector

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL PRACTICE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIST; FINLAND; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIST'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; DENTISTS; DENTISTS, WOMEN; FINLAND; HUMANS; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 58149090008     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: 15023850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016350802577792     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997;28:245-8.
2. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001;29:317-24.
3. Clarkson JE, Worthington HV, Davies RM. Restorative treatment provided over five years for adults regularly attending general dental practice. J Dent 2000;28:233-9.
4. Forss H, Widström E. From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 2001;59:57-62.
5. Mjör IA. Longterm cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:60-5.
6. Tobi H, Kreulen CM, Vondeling H, van Amerongen WE. Cost-effectiveness of composite resins and amalgam in the replacement of amalgam Class II restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:137-43.
7. Chadwick BL, Dummer PM, Dunstan FD, Gilmour AS, Jones RJ, Phillips CJ, et al. What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations. Qual Health Care 1999;8:202-7.
8. Sjögren P, Halling A. Survival time of class II molar restorations in relation to patient and dental health insurance costs for treatment. Swed Dent J 2002;26:59-66.
9. Sjögren P, Halling A. Long-term cost of direct class II molar restorations. Swed Dent J 2002;26:107-14.
10. Chadwick B, Treasure E, Dummer P, Dunstan F, Gilmour A, Jones R, et al. The longevity of dental restorations: a systematic review. University of York: York Publishing Services; 2001.
11. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. Contributing co-variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent 1991;4:247-50.
12. Bayne SC. Dental restorations for oral rehabilitation- testing of laboratory properties versus clinical performance for clinical decision-making. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:921-32.
13. Jokstad A, Bayne S, Blunck U, Tyas M, Wilson N. Quality of dental restorations. FDI Commission Project 2-95. Int Dent J 2001;51:117-58.
14. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;25:481-508.
15. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:297-303.
16. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-11.
17. Bogacki RE, Hunt RJ, del Aguila M, Smith WR. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Oper Dent 2002;27:488-92.
18. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder R. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 2): Variation by patients' characteristics. J Dent 2005;33:817-26.
19. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder R. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 4): Influence of time and place. J Dent 2005;33:837-47.
20. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): Variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. J Dent 2005;33:805-15.
21. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 3): Variation by dentist factors. J Dent 2005;33:827-35.
22. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:775-83.
23. Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent 2002;27:117-23.
24. Heinikainen M, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners. Community Dent Health 2002;19:98-103.
25. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999;187:432-9.
26. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:97-101.
27. Van Nieuwenhuysen J-P, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003;31:395-405.
28. Forss H, Widström E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62:82-6.
29. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:135-42.
30. Maryniuk GA, Kaplan SH. Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:39-45.
31. Atchison K, Schoen M. A comparison of quality in dual-choice dental plan: capitation versus fee-for-service. J Public Health Dent 1990;50:186-93.
32. Grytten J. The effect of supplier inducement on Norwegian dental services. Community Dent Health 1991;8:221-3.
33. Hawthorne WS, Smales RJ. Factors influencing long-term restoration survival in three private dental practices in Adelaide. Aust Dent J 1997;42:59-63.
34. Drake CW, Maryniuk GA, Bentley C. Reasons for restoration replacement: differences in practice patterns. Quintessence Int 1990;21:125-30.
35. Maryniuk GA. Practice variation: learned and socio-economic factors. Adv Dent Res 1990;4:19-24.
36. Kay EJ, Nuttall NM. Clinical decision making - an art or a science? Part II: making sense of treatment decisions. Br Dent J 1995;178:113-6.
37. Mejàre I, Sundberg H, Espelid I, Tveit AB. Caries assessment and restorative treatment thresholds reported by Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:149-54.
38. Tan RT, Burke FJ. Response rates to questionnaires mailed to dentists. A review of 77 publications. Int Dent J 1997;47:349-54.
39. McFarlane E, Olmsted MG, Murphy J, Hill CA. Nonresponse bias in a mail survey of physicians. Eval Health Prof 2007;30:170-85.
40. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. Br Dent J 2002;192:699-702.