Grading arson

Criminal Law and Philosophy

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 79-95

  Cahill, Michael T ^a  

^a BROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Arson; Criminal codes; Endangerment; Grading of offenses; Mischief; Property damage; Special part

Indexed keywords

EID: 58049220317     PISSN: 18719791     EISSN: 18719805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11572-008-9058-1     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. American Law Institute, Model Penal Code and Commentaries (1985).
2. Cahill, M. T. (2004). Offense grading and multiple liability: New challenges for a Model Penal Code Second. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 1(2), 599-610.
3. Cahill, M. T. (2007). Attempt, reckless homicide, and the design of criminal law. University of Colorado Law Review, 78(3), 879-956.
4. Duff, R. A., & Green, S. P. (Eds.). (2005). Defining crimes: Essays on the special part of the criminal law. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Lacey, N. (1998). Philosophy, history and criminal law theory. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 1(2), 295-328.
6. Poulos, J. (1986). The metamorphosis of the law of arson. Missouri Law Review, 51(2), 295-456.
7. Robinson, P. H., & Cahill, M. T. (2005). The accelerating degradation of American criminal codes. Hastings Law Journal, 56(4), 633-655.
8. Robinson, P. H., & Cahill, M. T. (2006). Law without justice: Why criminal law doesn't give people what they deserve. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Robinson, P. H., et al. (2000). The five worst (and five best) American criminal codes. Northwestern University Law Review, 95(1), 1-89.
10. Robinson, P. H., et al. (2007). Codifying Shari'a: International norms, legality and the freedom to invent new forms. Journal of Comparative Law, 2(1), 1-53.
11. Zaibert, L. (2007). The richness of the special part of the criminal law. New Criminal Law Review, 10(3), 470-482.