Comment on 'A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees'

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 147-149

  Kupczok, Anne ^a   Von Haeseler, Arndt ^a  

^a MAX F PERUTZ LABORATORIES   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INTERNET; LETTER; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 58049194187     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn539     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Blum,M.G.B. and François,O. (2006) Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance. Syst. Biol., 55, 685-691.
2. Bryant,D. et al. (2003) The size of a maximum agreement subtree for random binary trees. Dimacs Series in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science, 61, 55-65.
3. de Vienne,D.M. et al. (2007a) A congruence index for testing topological similarity between trees. Bioinformatics, 23, 3119-3124.
4. de Vienne,D.M. et al. (2007b) When can host shifts produce congruent host and parasite phylogenies? A simulation approach. J. Evol. Biol., 20, 1428-1438.
5. Finden,C.R. and Gordon,A.D. (1985) Obtaining common pruned trees. J. Classif., 2, 255-276.
6. Goddard,W. et al. (1994) The agreement metric for labeled binary trees. Math. Biosci., 123, 215-226.
7. Swofford,D.L. (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.