On a concept of a consensus reaching process support system based on the use of soft computing and Web techniques

World Scientific Proceedings Series on Computer Engineering and Information Science 1; Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control - Proceedings of the 8th International FLINS Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 859-864

  Kacprzyk, J ^a   Zadrozny, S ^a  

^a SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Consensus; Fuzzy logic; Group decision making; Ontology; Preferences

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FUZZY LOGIC; ONTOLOGY; SOFT COMPUTING; WEBSITES;

CONSENSUS; DECISION MAKERS; GROUP DECISION MAKING; GROUP MEMBERS; PREFERENCES; PROCESS SUPPORT; WEB TECHNIQUES; WEB-BASED SYSTEM;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 58049174334     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812799470_0141     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. D. G. Lowe, Cooperative structuring of information: The representation of reasoning and debate, Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies 23, 97-111 (1985).
2. G. Carenini and J. D. Moore, Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments, Artif. Intell. 170, 925-952 (2006).
3. A. Jameson and B. Smyth, Recommendation to groups, in The Adaptive Web, eds. P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa and W. Nejdl, LNCS, Vol. 4321 (Springer, 2007).
4. J. Kacprzyk, On some fuzzy cores and "soft" consensus measures in group decision making, in The analysis of fuzzy information, ed. J. Bezdek (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1987) pp. 119-130.
5. S. Zadrożny, An approach to the consensus reaching support in fuzzy environment, in Consensus under fuzziness, eds. J. Kacprzyk, H. Nurmi and M. Fedrizzi (Kluwer, Boston, 1997) pp. 83-109.
6. S. Zadrożny and J. Kacprzyk, An internet-based group decision and consensus reaching support system, in Applied decision support with soft computing, eds. X. Yu and J. Kacprzyk (Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 2003) pp. 263-275.
7. J. Kacprzyk, S. Zadrożny and A. Wilbik, Linguistic summarization of some static and dynamic features of consensus reaching, in Computational Intelligence, Theory and Applications, ed. B. Reusch (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006) pp. 19-28.
8. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma and J. Verdegay, A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78, 73-88 (1996).
9. P. Rittgen, Negotiating models, in CAiSE, eds. J. Krogstie, A. L. Opdahl and G. Sindre, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4495 (Springer, 2007).
10. C. Tempich, H. S. Pinto, Y. Sure and S. Staab, An argumentation ontology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engineering processes of ontologies (diligent), in ESWC, eds. A. Gómez-Pérez and J. Euzenat, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3532 (Springer, 2005).
11. P. Mika, Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics, J. Web Sem. 5, 5-15 (2007).
12. M. Fedrizzi, J. Kacprzyk and S. Zadrożny, An interactive multi-user decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers, Decision Support Systems 4, 313-327 (1988).
13. E. Herrera-Viedma, L. Martinez, F. Mata and F. Chiclana, A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations, IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 13, 644-658 (2005).