Comparison of classification methods on protein-protein interaction document classification

Proceedings - 2008 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops, BIBMW

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 83-90

  Xu, Guixian ^a,b,c   Niu, Zhendong ^a   Uetz, Peter ^d   Gao, Xu ^e   Liu, Hongfang ^b  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MINZU UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

^d J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e North China Grid Company Limited   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; CYTOLOGY; FLOW INTERACTIONS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

CELL BIOLOGIES; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION METHODS; CURATION; DATA SETS; DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS; DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATIONS; DOCUMENT SETS; FUNDAMENTAL PROCESSES; GENOMICS; IMBALANCED DATA SETS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; MACHINE LEARNING COMMUNITIES; NEGATIVE DOCUMENTS; POSITIVE DOCUMENTS; PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; PROTEOMICS DATUMS; UNLABELED DOCUMENTS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 58049170453     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BIBMW.2008.4686213     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. DJ Higham, M Rasajski, N Przulj. Fitting a Geometric Graph to a Protein-Protein Interaction Network. Bioinformatics, 24(8): 1093-9,2008.
2. I Spasic, S Ananiadou, J McNaught, A Kumar. Text mining and ontologies in biomedicine: Making sense of raw text. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6(3): 239-251, 2005.
3. JM Temkin and MR Gilder. Extraction of protein interaction information from unstructured text using a context-free grammar. Bioinformatics, 19(16): 2046-2053, 2003.
4. I Donaldson, J Martin, Bd Bruijn, C Wolting, V Lay, B Tuekam, S Zhang, B Baskin, GD Bader, K Michalickova, T Pawson and CWV Hogue. PreBIND and Textomy - mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine. BMC Bioinformatics, 4:11, 2003.
5. N Daraselia, A Yuryev, S Egorov, S Novichkova, A Nikitin and I Mazo. Extracting human protein interactions from MEDLINE using a full-sentence parser. Bioinformatics 20(5): 604-611, 2004.
6. ST Ahmed, D Chidambaram, H Davulcu, C Baral. NLP methodIntEx: A Syntactic Role Driven Protein-Protein Interaction Extractor for Bio-Medical Text. In Proceedings of the ACL-ISMB Workshop on Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases: Mining Biological Semantics, pages 54-61, 2005.
7. J Xiao, J Su, GD Zhou, and CL Tan. Protein-Protein Interaction Extraction: A Supervised Learning Approach J Xiao 2005. In Proc Symp on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine, 2005.
8. GM Weiss. Mining with Rarity: A Unifying Framework. SIGKDD Explorations, 6: 7-19, 2004.
9. M. Molinara, M.T. Ricamato, F. Tortorella.Facing Imbalanced Classes through Aggregation of Classifiers. In 14th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. 2007.
10. NV Chawla, N Japkowicz, A Kotcz . Editorial: Spacial Issue on Learning from Imbalanced data Sets. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, pages: 1-6, 2004.
11. X Zhu. Lazy Bagging for Classifying Imbalanced Data.In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Pages 763-768, 2007.
12. F Verhein, S Chawla. Using Significant, Positively Associated and Relatively Class Correlated Rules for Associative Classification of Imbalanced Datasets. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Pages 679-684, 2007.
13. Chris Seiffert,Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Jason Van Hulse, Amri Napolitano.Mining Data with Rare Events: A Case Study. In 19th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. pages 132-139,2007.
14. D Mladenic. Feature subset selection in text -learning. In: 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 95-100, 1998.
15. DD Lewis, M Ringuette. A comparison of two learning algorithms for text categorization. In Proceedings of SDAIR-94, 3rd Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, pages 81-93, 1994.
16. WW Cohen and Y Singer. Context-Sensitive Learning Methods for Text Categorization. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol 17, Pages 141-173, 1999.
17. ED Wiener, JO Pedersen and AS Weigend. A neural network approach to topic spotting. In Proceedings of SDAIR-95, 4th Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, Pages 317-332, 1995.
18. T Joachims. A Probabilistic Analysis of the Rocchio Algorithm with TFIDF for text Categorization. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages: 143-151, 1997.
19. G Salton, M McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983.
20. A McCallum, K Nigam. A comparison of event models for naive bayes text classification. AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, 1998.
21. VN Vapnik. Statistical Learning theory[M].1998.
22. HF Liu, C Wu. A Study of Text Categorization for Model Organism Databases. In HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: Biolink 2004, Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases, pages 25-32, 2004.
23. RTH Tsai, HC Hung, HJ Dai, YW Lin, WL Hsu. Exploiting likely-positive and unlabeled data to improve the identification of protein-protein interaction articles. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9(Suppl 1): S3, 2008.
24. CG Weng and Josiah Poon. A data complexity analysis on imbalanced datasets and an alternative imbalance recovering strategy. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence. 2006.
25. W Ng and M Dash. An Evaluation of Progressive Sampling for Imbalanced Data Sets. In Sixth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining - Workshops. 2006.
26. SJ Yen, YS Lee, CH Lin and JC Ying. Investigating the Effect of Sampling Methods for Imbalanced Data Distributions. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 2006.
27. XY Liu and ZH Zhou. The Influence of Class Imbalance on Cost-Sensitive Learning:An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Data Mining. 2006.
28. M Molinara, M.T. Ricamato, F. Tortorella.Facing Imbalanced Classes through Aggregation of Classifiers. In 14th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. 2007.
29. S Visa, A Ralescu. The Effect of Imbalanced Data Class Distribution on Fuzzy Classifiers - Experimental Study. In 2005 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pages 749-754, 2005.
30. T Yu, T Jan, S Simoff and J Debeham. A Hierarchical VQSVM for Imbalanced Data Sets. In Proceedings of international Joint Conference on Neural Networks. 2007.
31. G Forman. An Extensive Emporical Study of Feature Selectiong Metrics for Text Classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3: 1289-1305, 2003.
32. X Chen, M Wasikowski. FAST: A ROC-based Feature Selection Metric for Small Samples and Imbalanced Data Classification Problems. KDD'08, pages: 124-132. 2008.
33. S Ertekin, J Huang, CL Giles. Active Learning for Class Imbalance Problem. SIGIR 2007.
34. S Ertekin1, J Huang, Léon Bottou, CL Giles. Learning on the Border:Active Learning in Imbalanced Data Classification. CIKM'07.
35. G Xu, L Yin, M Torii, Z Niu, C Wu, Z Hu and H Liu. Document Classification for Mining Host Pathogen Protein-Protein Interactions. IEEE BIBM 2008, in press.
36. J Goll, SV Rajagopala, SC Shiau, H Wu , BT Lamb and P Uetz. MPIDB: The microbial protein interaction database. Bioinformatics, 24(15): 1743-1744, 2008.
37. O Bodenreider. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Research, 32: D267-D270,2004.
38. http://www.cs.umass.edu/~mccallum/bow/
39. S Robertson. Understanding inverse document frequency: on theoretical arguments for IDF. Journal of Documentation. 60(5): 503-520, 2004.