Choosing research priorities by using the analytic hierarchy process: An application to international agriculture

R and D Management

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 77-86

  Braunschweig, Thomas ^a   Becker, Barbara ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442291522     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00324.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W. and Pardey, P.O. (1995) Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2. Braunschweig, T. (2000) Priority Setting in Agricultural Biotechnology Research: Supporting Public Decisions in Developing Countries with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, ISNAR Research Report No. 16. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research.
3. Braunschweig, T. and Reyes, J.C. (2000) Integrating and Enhancing the Research Priority Setting for Agricultural Biotechnology in the Philippines, Final Report. Laguna. Philippines: PCARRD, DA-BAR, UPLB, and ISNAR.
4. Byerlee, D. and Alex, G.E. (1998) Strengthening National Agricultural Research Systems: Policy Issues and Good Practice, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Series. Washington, DC: World Bank.
5. Contant, R.B. and Bottomley, A. (1988)'Priority setting in agricultural research, Working Paper No. 10. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research.
6. Dyer, R.F. and Forman, E.H. (1992) Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Support Systems, 8, 99-124.
7. Golden, B.L., Wasil, E.A. and Levy, D.E. (1989) Applications of the analytic hierarchy process: a categorized, annotated bibliography. In: Golden, B.L., Wasil, E.A. and Harker, P.T. (eds), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies. New York: Springer, pp. 37-58.
8. Harker, P.T. (1989) The art and science of decision making: the analytic hierarchy process. In: Golden, B.L., Wasil, E.A. and Harker, P.T. (eds) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies. New York: Springer, pp. 3-36.
9. Harrison, S.R. and Qureshi, M.E. (2000) Choice of stakeholder groups and members in multicriteria decision models. Natural Resources Forum, 24, 11-19.
10. Liberalere, M.J. (1989) A decision approach for R&D project selection. In: Golden, B.L., Wasil, E.A. and Harker, P.T. (eds) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Applications and Studies. New York: Springer, pp. 82-100.
11. Lockett, G., Hetherington, B., Yallup, P., Stratford, M. and Cox, B. (1986) Modelling a research portfolio using AHP: a group decision process. R&D Management, 16, 2, 151-160.
12. Manahan, M.P. (1989) Technology acquisition and research prioritization. International Journal of Technology Management, 4, 1, 9-19.
13. Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Saaty, T.L. (1995) Decision Making for Leaders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World (third edition). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
15. Schmoldt, D.L. and Peterson, D.L. (2001) Efficient group decision making in workshop settings. In: Smoldt, D.L., Kangas, J., Mendoza, G.A. and Pesonen, M. (eds) The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 97-114.
16. Shumway, C.R. (1981) Subjectivity in ex ante research evaluation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 1, 169-173.
17. Thompson, P.B. (1998) Agricultural Ethics: Research, Teaching, and Public Policy. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
18. Vargas, L.G. (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 1, 2-8.
19. Zahedi, F. (1986) The analytic hierarchy process - a survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16, 4, 96-108.