A process engineering method based on ontology and patterns

ICSOFT 2008 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Software and Data Technologies

Volumn ISDM, Issue ABF/-, 2008, Pages 29-36

  Hug, Charlotte ^a   Front, Agnès ^a   Rieu, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Information system engineering; Ontology; Patterns; Process engineering method; Process meta model

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENT PROCESS; DOMAIN ONTOLOGIES; META MODEL; PATTERNS; PROCESS META-MODEL; TWO PHASIS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

MODELS;

EID: 58049160080     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Atkinson, C., & Kühne, T. (2001). The Essence of Multilevel Metamodeling. In UML 2001, LNCS, 2185, 19-33, Springer-Verlag, London
2. Coad, P. (1992). Object-Oriented Patterns. Communication of the ACM, 35 (9), 152-159.
3. Conte, A., Fredj, M., Hassine, I., Giraudin, J.-P., & Rieu, D. (2002). A tool and a formalism to design and apply patterns. In OOIS '02: Proceedings of the eight International Conference on Object-Oriented. Information Systems, (pp. 135-146). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
4. Finkelstein, A., Kramer, J., & Goedicke, M. (1990). Viewpoint oriented software development. In Proceedings of the third International Workshop on Software Engineering and Its Applications, (pp. 337-351).
5. Fiorini, S. T., do Prado Leite, J. C. S., & de Lucena, C. J. P. (2001). Process reuse architecture. In K. R. Dittrich, A. Geppert, & M. C. Norrie (Eds.) CAiSE 2001: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 13th International Conference, vol. 2068 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (pp. 284-298). Springer.
6. Harel, D. (1987). Statecharts: A visual formulation for complex systems. Sci. Comput. Program., 8 (3), 231-274.
7. Hassine, I., Rieu; D., Bounaas, F., & Seghrouchni, O. (2002). Symphony: a conceptual model based on business components. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 34-39.
8. Henderson-Sellers, B., & Gonzalez-Perez, C. (2005). A comparison of four process metamodels and the creation of a new generic standard. Information & Software Technology, 47 (1), 49-65.
9. Hug, C., Front, A., & Rieu, D. (2007). Ingénierie des processus: une approche à base de patrons. In Actes du XXVème Congrès INFORSID, Perros-Guirec, France, 22 au 25 mai 2007 , (pp. 471-486).
10. Humphrey, W. S., & Kellner, M. I. (1989). Software process modeling: principles of entity process models. In ICSE '89: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Software engineering, (pp. 331-342). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
11. Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Schmidt, J. W., & Vassiliou, Y. (1992). Daida: an environment for evolving information systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 10 (1), 1-50.
12. Krachten, P. (2000) The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, Addison-Wesley.
13. Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. W. J. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper 131, Heidelberg-Berkeley.
14. Leppanen, M. (2006). Towards an ontology for information systems development. In J. Krogstie, T. Halpin, & H. Proper (Eds.) EMMSAD'06: Proceedings of the Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design, (pp. 363-374). Luxembourg, Luxembourg, EU: Namur University Press, Namur, Belgium, EU.
15. OMG (2005). Software Process Engineering Metamodel, version 1.1. Tech. Rep. formal/05-01-06, Object Management Group.
16. OMG (2007). Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure, version 2.1.1. Tech. Rep. formal/2007-02-03, Object Management Group.
17. OOSPICE. (2002). Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination for Object-Oriented/Component-Based Software Development. Retrieved October, 7, 2002 from www.oospice.com
18. Open Process Framework. (2005). Retrieved December, 16,2005 from http://www.opfro.org
19. Plihon, V., & Rolland, C. (1995). Modelling ways-of-working. In CAiSe '95: Proceedings of the seventh International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, (pp. 126-139). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
20. Potts, C., & Bruns, G. (1988). Recording the reasons for design decisions. In ICSE '88: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Software engineering, (pp. 418-427). Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
21. Rolland C., Souveyet C., Moreno M. (1995). An Approach for defining ways-of-working. Information System Journal, 20 (4), 337-359.
22. Rolland, C. (1998). A comprehensive view of process engineering. In CAiSE '98: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, (pp. 1-24). Pisa, Italia: Springer-Verlag.
23. Rolland, C., Prakash, N., & Benjamen, A. (1999). A multi-model view of process modelling. Requirements Engineering, 4 (4), 169-187.
24. Sommerville, I., Kotonya, G., Viller, S., & Sawyer, P. (1995). Process viewpoints. In EWSPT '95: Proceedings of the Fourth European Workshop on Software Process Technology, (pp. 2-8). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
25. Standards Australia. (2004). Standard Metamodel for Software Development Methodologies, AS 4651-2004.
26. Tran, H. N., Coulette, B., & Dong, B. T. (2007). Modeling process patterns and their application. In ICSEA '07: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, (p. 15). Washington, USA: IEEE Computer Society.