A comparison of four process metamodels and the creation of a new generic standard

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 49-65

  Henderson Sellers, B ^a   Gonzalez Perez, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Metamodel; Methodology; Software development; Standards

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; PROCESS ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STANDARDS;

METHODOLOGY; OPEN PROCESS FRAMEWORK (OPF); SOFTWARE PROCESS ENGINEERING METAMODEL (SPEM);

METADATA;

EID: 9444221345     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2004.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. B. Henderson-Sellers, R.T. Dué, I. Graham, G. Collins, A qualitative comparison of two processes for object-oriented software development, Inf. Software Technol. 43 (12) (2001) 705-724.
2. M.E.C. Hull, P. Taylor, J.R.P. Hanna, R.J. Millar, Software development processes - an assessment. Inf. Software Technol. 44 (1) (2002) 1-12.
3. OMG, Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification, Version 1.0, Object Management Group, formal/02-11-14, 2002.
4. OMG, OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification, Version 1.4, September 2001, OMG document formal/01-09-68 through 80 (13 documents) [Online]. Available http://www.omg.org
5. D.G. Firesmith, B. Henderson-Sellers, The OPEN Process Framework: An Introduction, Addison-Wesley, Harlow, 2002.
6. C. Gonzalez-Perez, T. McBride, B. Henderson-Sellers, A metamodel for assessable software development methodologies, Software Qual. J. (2004) in press.
7. I.T. Hawryszkiewycz, Knowledge networks in administrative system, Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advances in Electronic Government, Zaragoza, Spain, 2000, pp. 59-76.
8. B. Henderson-Sellers, M. Serour, T. McBride, C. Gonzalez-Perez, L. Dagher, Process construction and customization. Journal of Universal Computer Science 10 (3) (2004) online journal accessible at http://www.jucs.org.
9. Standards Australia, Standard Metamodel for Software Development Methodologies, draft specification AS4651-2004 (http://www. standards.com.au), 25 March 2004.
10. C. Gonzalez-Perez, B. Henderson-Sellers, A powertype-based metamodelling framework, Software Syst. Modell. (2004) submitted.
11. W.R. Duncan, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, Project Management Institute, PA, USA, 1996, 176 pp.
12. J.J. Odell, Power types. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 7 (2) (1994) 8-12.
13. C. Atkinson, T. Kühne, Meta-level independent modelling, International Workshop on Model Engineering at 14th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Sophia Antipolis and Cannes, France, 2000.
14. S. Brinkkemper, Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools, Inform. Software Technol. 38 (4) (1996) 275-280.
15. C. Atkinson, T. Kühne, Processes and products in a multi-level metamodeling architecture, Int. J. Software Engng Knowledge Engng 11 (6) (2001) 761-783.
16. C. Atkinson, T. Kühne, The essence of multilevel modelling, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the UML, Toronto, Canada, Springer, Berlin, 2001.
17. M.K. Serour, Migrating to object technology: identifying, optimizing and testing appropriate industry-focussed strategies, PhD Thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, 2003.
18. I.T. Hawryszkiewycz, A. Lin, Process knowledge support for emergent processes. Proceedings of the Second IASTED International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Scottsdale, Arizona, 2003, pp. 83-87.