New approach using lidar measurements to characterize spatiotemporal aerosol mass distribution in an underground railway station in Paris

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 575-583

  Raut, J C ^a   Chazette, P ^a   Fortain, A ^b  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^b SNCF   (France)

Author keywords

Lidar; Mass spatial distribution; PM10; PM2.5; Subway; Underground station

Indexed keywords

AEROSOLS; AIR QUALITY; INDOOR AIR POLLUTION; NEPHELOMETERS; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); RAILROAD STATIONS; RAILROADS; REMOTE SENSING; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SUBWAY STATIONS; SUBWAYS;

AEROSOL EXTINCTION COEFFICIENT; AEROSOL MASS CONCENTRATION; PM10; PM2.5; SIZE DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENTS; SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTIONS; UNDERGROUND RAILWAY STATIONS; UNDERGROUND STATIONS;

OPTICAL RADAR;

AERIAL SURVEY; AEROSOL; AIR QUALITY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); INDOOR AIR; LIDAR; MEASUREMENT METHOD; RAILWAY; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; ILE DE FRANCE; PARIS; VILLE DE PARIS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 58049149142     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. 2.5) in the Helsinki subway system. Atmospheric Environment 39 (2005) 5059-5066
2. Abadie M., Limam K., Bouilly J., and Génin D. Particle pollution in the French high-speed train (TGV) smoker cars: measurement and prediction of passengers exposure. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 2017-2027
3. 2.5) personal exposure levels in transport microenvironments, London, UK. The Science of the Total Environment 279 (2001) 29-44
4. Angström A. The parameters of atmospheric turbidity. Tellus 16 (1964) 64-75
5. Birenzvige A., Eversole J., Seaver M., Francesconi S., Valdes E., and Kulaga H. Aerosol characteristics in a subway environment. Aerosol Science and Technology 37 (2003) 210-220
6. Chazette P., Sanak J., and Dulac F. New approach for aerosol profiling with a lidar onboard an ultralight aircraft: application to the African monsoon multidisciplinary analysis. Environmental Science and Technology 41 (2007) 8335-8341
7. Chillrud S., Epstein D., Ross J., Sax S., Pederson J., Spengler J., and Kinney P. Elevated airborne exposures of teenagers to manganese, chromium, and iron from steel dust and New York City's subway system. Environmental Science and Technology 38 (2004) 732-737
8. Chu D.A., Kaufman Y.J., Zibordi G., Chern J.D., Mao J., Li C., and Holben B.N. Global monitoring of air pollution over land from the earth observing system-terra moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS). Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (2003) D21
9. Collis R.T.H. Lidar: a new atmospheric probe. The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 92 (1966) 220-230
10. Fromme H., Oddoy A., Piloty M., Krause M., and Lahrz T. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and diesel engine emission (elemental carbon) inside a car and a subway train. The Science of the Total Environment 217 (1998) 165-173
11. Gupta P., Christopher S.A., Wang J., Gehrig R., Lee Y., and Kumar N. Satellite remote sensing of particulate matter and air quality assessment over global cities. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 5880-5892
12. Johansson C., and Johansson P.A. Particulate matter in the underground of Stockholm. Atmospheric Environment 37 (2003) 3-9
13. Klett J.D. Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns. Applied Optics 20 (1981) 211-220
14. Leutwyler M., Siegmann K., and Monn Ch. Suspended particulate matter in railway coaches. Atmospheric Environment 36 1 (2002) 1-7
15. 2.5 concentrations using multiangle imaging spectroradiometer aerosol optical thickness over the contiguous united states. Journal of Geophysical Research 109 (2004) D22206 10.1029/2004jd005025
16. Mishchenko M.I., Travis L.W., Kahn R.A., and West R.A. Modeling phase functions for dustlike tropospheric aerosols using a shape mixture of randomly oriented polydisperse spheroids. Journal of Geophysical Research 102 (1997) 16831-16847
17. Pfeifer G., Harrison R., and Lynam D. Personal exposures to airborne metals in London taxi drivers and office workers in 1995 and 1996. The Science of the Total Environment 235 (1999) 253-260
18. Raut J.-C., and Chazette P. Retrieval of aerosol complex refractive index from a synergy between lidar, sunphotometer and in situ measurements during LISAIR experiment. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 7 (2007) 2797-2815
19. Raut J.-C., Chazette P., and Fortain A. Link between aerosol optical, microphysical and chemical measurements in an underground railway station in Paris. Atmospheric Environment 43 4 (2008) 860-868
20. Seinfeld J.H., and Pandis S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (1998), John Wiley & Sons, New York pp. 408-440
21. Sitzmann B., Kendall M., Watt J., and Williams I. Characterisation of airborne particles in London by computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy. The Science of the Total Environment 241 (1999) 63-73
22. 2.5 mass: implications for air quality studies. Geophysical Research Letters 30 21 (2003) 2095
23. Zielinski M., Riimmelt H., and Fruhmann G. Ambient air soot concentrations in Munich public transportation systems. The Science of the Total Environment 196 (1997) 107-110