Husband-wife agreement, power relations and contraceptive use in Turkey

International Family Planning Perspectives

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 127-137

  Kulczycki, Andrzej ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE USE; DECISION MAKING; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; FAMILY PLANNING; FERTILITY; HEALTH SURVEY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; CONDOM; CONTRACEPTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIOECONOMICS; SPOUSE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMUNICATION; CONDOMS; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PREVALENCE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPOUSES; TURKEY;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 58049102708     PISSN: None     EISSN: 01903187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/3412708     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Warren CW et al., Fertility and family planning in Jordan: results from the 1985 Jordan Husbands' Fertility Survey, Studies in Family Planning, 1990, 21(1):33-39.
2. Ünalan T, Problems of collecting information from men in demographic surveys: experience from the 1988 Turkish Population and Health Survey, paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Men, Family Formation and Reproduction, Buenos Aires, Argentina, May 13-15, 1998.
3. United Nations (UN), Fertility levels and trends in countries with intermediate levels of fertility, in: Fertility, Contraception and Population Policies, New York: UN, 2003, pp. 136-168.
4. Koenig MA, Simmons GB and Misra ED, Husband-wife inconsistencies in contraceptive use responses, Population Studies, 1984, 38(2):281-298.
5. Bankole A and Singh S, Couples' fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: hearing the man's voice, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 24(1): 15-24.
6. Becker S, Couples and reproductive health: a review of couple studies, Studies in Family Planning, 1996, 27(6):291-306.
7. Becker S and Costenbader E, Husbands' and wives' reports of contraceptive use, Studies in Family Planning, 2001,32(2):111-129.
8. Ezeh AC and Mboup G, Estimates and explanations of gender differentials in contraceptive prevalence rates, Studies in Family Planning, 1997, 28(2):104-121.
9. Miller K, Zulu EM and Watkins SC, Husband-wife survey responses in Malawi, Studies in Family Planning, 2001, 32(3):161-174.
10. Salem R, Men's surveys: new findings, Population Reports, 2004, Series M, No. 18.
11. Blanc AK, The effect of power in sexual relationships on sexual and reproductive health: an examination of the evidence, Studies in Family Planning, 2001, 32(3):189-213.
12. Grady WR et al., The role of relationship power in couple decisions about contraception, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New York, Mar. 29-31, 2007.
13. Bledsoe C, Lerner S and Guyer JI, eds., Fertility and the Male Life-Cycle in the Era of Fertility Decline, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.
14. Greene ME and Biddlecom AE, Absent and problematic men: demographic accounts of male reproductive roles, Population and Development Review, 2000, 26(1):81-115.
15. Voas D, Conflicting preferences: a reason fertility tends to be too high or too low, Population and Development Review, 2003, 29(4):627-646.
16. DeRose LF and Ezeh AC, Men's influence on the onset and progress of fertility decline in Ghana, 1988-98, Population Studies, 2005, 59(2):197-210.
17. Dodoo F N-A, Men matter: additive and interactive gendered preferences and reproductive behavior in Kenya, Demography, 1998, 35(2):229-242.
18. Biddlecom AE, Casterline JB and Perez AE, Spouses' views of contraception, International Family Planning Perspectives, 1997, 23(3): 108-115.
19. Mason K and Smith H, Husbands' versus wives' fertility goals and use of contraception: the influence of gender context in five Asian countries, Demography, 2001, 37(3):299-311.
20. Jejeebhoy S, Convergence and divergence in spouses' perspectives on womens autonomy in rural India, Studies in Family Planning, 2002, 33(4):299-308.
21. U.S. Bureau of the Census, International data base country summary: Turkey, , accessed Feb. 24, 2008.
22. Turkish Statistical Institute, Population and development indicators, 2007,
23. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (HIPS) and Macro International, Inc., Turkish Demographic and Health Survey, 1998, Ankara, Turkey: HIPS; and Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, Inc., 1999.
24. HIPS, Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2003, Ankara, Turkey: HIPS, 2004.
25. Kulczycki A, The determinants of withdrawal use in Turkey: a husband's imposition or a womans choice? Social Science & Medicine, 2004, 59(5):1019-1033.
26. Ortayli N et al., Why withdrawal? Why not withdrawal? Men's perspectives, Reproductive Health Matters, 2005, 13(25):164-173.
27. Ergöçmen BA et al. An Analytical Insight into a Traditional Method: Withdrawal Use in Turkey, Ankara, Turkey: HIPS; and Calverton, MD, USA: ORC Macro, 2001.
28. Yannikkerem E, Acar H and Elem E, Withdrawal users' perceptions of and experience with contraceptive methods in Manisa, Turkey, Midwifery, 2006, 22(3):274-284.
29. UN Development Programme (UNDP), Arab Human Development Report 2003, New York: UNDP, 2003.
30. Freedom House, Women's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa: Citizenship and Justice, New York: Freedom House, 2005.
31. Ergöçmen BA, Women's status and fertility in Turkey, in: HIPS and Macro International, Inc., eds., Fertility Trends, Women's Status, and Reproductive Expectations in Turkey: Results of Further Analysis of the 1993 Turkish Demographic and Health Survey, Ankara, Turkey: HIPS; and Calverton, MD, USA: Macro International, Inc., 1997, pp. 81-104.
32. Arat ZF, ed., Deconstructing Images of the Turkish Woman, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998.
33. Kardam N, Turkey's Engagement with Global Women's Human Rights, Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate, 2005.
34. Anil E et al., Turkish Civil and Penal Code Reforms from a Gender Perspective: The Success of Two Nationwide Campaigns, Women for Women's Human Rights-New Ways, 2005, , accessed Aug. 30, 2008.
35. Akin L and Ozaydin N, Consistency of couple declaration about using family planning methods in Turkey, Journal of Biosocial Science, 2006, 38(6):735-744.
36. Sirkeci I, Exploring the Kurdish population in the Turkish context, Genus, 2000, 56(1-2):149-175.
37. Filmer D and Pritchett L, The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: evidence from 35 countries, Population and Development Review, 1999, 25(1):85-120.
38. Rutstein SO and Johnston K, The DHS Wealth Index, DHS Comparative Reports, Calverton, MD, USA: ORC Macro 2004, No. 6.
39. Cohen J, A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960, 20(1):37-46.
40. Landis JR and Koch GG, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 1977, 33(1):159-174.
41. Santow G, Coitus interruptus in the twentieth century, Population and Development Review, 1993, 19(4):767-792.
42. Tsui AO, DeSilva SV and Marinshaw K, Pregnancy avoidance and coital behavior, Demography, 1991, 28(1):101-107.
43. Rigby AS, Statistical methods in epidemiology. V. towards an understanding of the kappa coefficient, Disability and Rehabilitation, 2000, 22(8):339-344.
44. Bawah AA, Spousal communication and family planning behavior in Navrongo: a longitudinal assessment, Studies in Family Planning, 2002, 33(2):185-194.
45. Bankole A and Ezeh AC, Unmet need for couples: an analytical framework and evaluation with DHS data, Population Research and Policy Review, 1999, 18(6):579-605.
46. Kenny DA, Models of nonindependence in dyadic research, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1996, 13(2):279-294.
47. Kenny DA, Kashy DA and Cool WL, Dyadic Data Analysis, New York: Guilford Press, 2006.
48. Aras S et al., Sexual behaviours and contraception among university students in Turkey, Journal of Biosocial Science, 2007, 39(1):121-135.
49. Angin Z and Shorter FC, Negotiating reproduction and gender during the fertility decline in Turkey, Social Science & Medicine, 1998, 47(5):555-564.