Withdrawal users' perceptions of and experience with contraceptive methods in Manisa, Turkey

Midwifery

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 274-284

  Yanikkerem, Emre ^a   Acar, Hatice ^b   Elem, Emel ^c  

^a CELAL BAYAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Koceli University School of Health   (Turkey)

^c Denizli Private Eye Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coitus interruptus; Contraception; Family planning education; Withdrawal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COITUS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COITUS INTERRUPTUS; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEXUAL PARTNERS; TURKEY; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 33747169543     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akin A. Cultural and psychosocial factors are affecting contraceptive use and abortion in two provinces of Turkey. In: Mundigo A., and Indriso C. (Eds). Abortion in the developing world (1999), Zed Books, London
2. Angin Z., and Shorter F.C. Negotiating reproduction and gender during the fertility decline in Turkey. Social Science Medicine 47 (1998) 555-564
3. Aytekin N.T., Pala K., Irgil E., et al. Family planning choices and some characteristics of coitus interruptus users in Gemlik, Turkey. Women's Health Issues 11 (2001) 422-447
4. Bhushan I. Understanding unmet need (1996), Center For Communication Programs Working Paper (Draft). Baltimore, Maryland, Center For Communication Programs, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. http://www.jhuccp.org/pubs/wp/4/4.pdf www.jhuccp.org/pubs/wp/4/4.pdf
5. Bulut A., and Toubia N. Abortion services in two public sector hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey: how well do they meet women's needs?. In: Mundigo A., and Indriso C. (Eds). Abortion in the developing world (1999), Zed Books, London
6. Goldberg H.I., and Toros A. The use of traditional methods of contraception among Turkish couples. Studies in Family Planning 25 (1994) 122-128
7. Gürsoy A. Abortion in Turkey: a matter of state, family, or individual decision. Social Science Medicine 42 (1996) 531-542
8. Hancioglu, A., 1997. Fertility trends in Turkey: 1978-1993. In: Hacettepe University, Institute of Population Studies (HIPS) and Macro International (MI), (Eds.), Fertility trends, women's status, and reproductive expectations in Turkey: results of further analysis of the 1993 Turkish demographic and Health Survey. HIPS and MI, Calverton, MD.
9. Johnson T., and Macke B.A. Estimating contraceptive needs from trends in method mix in developing countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 22 (1996) 392-396
10. Karim M.S. Reproductive behaviour in Muslim countries. DHS Working Papers No: 23 (1997), Macro International and New York: United Nations Population Fund, Calverton, MD
11. Kulczycki A. The determinants of withdrawal use in Turkey: a husband's imposition or women's choice. Social Science and Medicine 59 (2004) 1019-1033
12. Manisa Director of Health, 2003. Manisa Population and health mid-2003 study report. http://www.manisa.saglik.gov.tr/yillik_2003. Last accessed 6 May 2005.
13. McLaren A. A history of contraception: from antiquity to the present day (1990), Basil Blackwell, Oxford
14. Nagase T., Kunii O., Wakai S., et al. Obstacles to modern contraceptive use among married women in southern urban Maldives. Contraception 68 (2003) 125-134
15. Network, 1996. Fertility awareness. contraceptive update: withdrawal popular in some countries. 17 (1). http://www.fhi.org/en/RH/Pubs/Network/v17_1/nt1717.htm
16. Population Reports, 1994. Family planning lessons and challenges: making programs work 22: 2-27, Population Information Program, Center for Communication Programs, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. August 1994.
17. Rosenfield J.A., Zahorik P.M., Saint W., et al. Women's satistification with birth control. Journal of Family Practice 36 (1993) 169-172
18. Sadana R., and Snow R. Balancing effectiveness, side effects and work: women's perceptions and experiences with modern contraceptive technology in Cambodia. Social Science Medicine 49 (1999) 343-358
19. Snow R., Garcia S., Kureshy N., et al. Attributes of contraceptive technology: women's preferences in seven countries. In: Ravindaran T.K.S., Beren M., and Cottingham J. (Eds). Beyond acceptability: users' perspectives on contraception (1997), World Health Organization Geneva, 36-48, Reproductive Health Matters Special Publication
20. Sümbüloglu K., and Sümbüloglu V. Biostatistics (1990), Hatipoglu publishing house, Ankara p. 229
21. The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1999. Sharing responsibility: women, society, and abortion worldwide, New York. http://www.eldis.org/static/DOC8118.htm
22. Trussell J., and Kost K. Contraceptive failure in the United States: a critical review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning 18 (1987) 273-283
23. Trussell J., and Kowal D. Essentials of contraception. In: Hatcher R.A., Trussell J., Steward F., et al. (Eds). Contraceptive technology (1998), Ardent Media, New York
24. Turkish Population and Health Survey. Hacettepe Institute for Population Studies (1998), Hacettepe University. HIPS, Ankara
25. Turkish Population and Health Survey. Hacettepe Institute for Population Studies (2003), Hacettepe HIPS, University Ankara
26. Türkistanli{dotless} E. The role of nurse counsellor about family planning catch to missing opportunity. Quality symposium in education and practice of nursing and midwifery (1998), Erciyes University Press, Kayseri
27. UN. Levels and trends in contraceptive use as assessed in 1998 (2000), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, St/ESA/SER.A/190, United Nations, New York
28. United Nations. The sex and age distribution of the world populations: The 1996 Revision (1997), United Nations, New York
29. Vessey M., Lawless M., and Yeates D. Efficacy of different contraceptive methods. The Lancet 8276 (1982) 841-842
30. Westoff C., and Bankole A. The time dynamics of unmet need; an example from Morocco. International Family Planning Perspectives 24 (1998) 12-14
31. Yurdakul M., and Vural G. Reasons for using traditional methods and role of nurses in family planning. Contraception 65 (2002) 347-350