Flexibility approach in the runway pavement using flemanco method

Transport

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 341-350

  Paslawski, Jerzy ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Construction management, runway; Construction process; FLEMANCO method; Flexibility; Monitoring, construction engineering

Indexed keywords

BRIDGES; CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING; CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT; CONSTRUCTION PROCESS; FLEMANCO METHOD; FLEXIBILITY;

CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 58049100183     PISSN: 16484142     EISSN: 16483480     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.341-350     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Antuchevičiene, J.; Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2006. Modelling renewal of construction objects applying methods of the game theory, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 12(4): 263-268.
2. Bartol, K.; Tein, M.; Matthews, G.; Sharma, B. 2007. Management: A Pacific Rim Focus. 5th edition, McGraw-Hill Education.
3. Booher, H. R. 2003. Handbook of Human Systems Integration. Wiley-Interscience.
4. Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Peldschus, E; Turskis, Z. 2008. Multiple-objective decision-making for road design, Transport 23(3): 183-193.
5. de NeufVille, R. 2000. Dynamic strategic planning for technology policy, International Journal of Technology Management 19(3-5): 225-245.
6. de NeufVille, R. 2004. Uncertainty Management for Engineering Systems Planning and Design: Engineering Systems Monograph, MIT Engineering Systems Symposium, Cambridge, 19 p. Available from Internet: .
7. Eppink, D. J. 1978. Planning for strategic flexibility, Long Range Planning 11(4): 9-15.
8. Evans, J. S. 1991. Strategic flexibility for high technology manoeuvres: a conceptual framework, Journal of Management Studies 28(1): 69-89.
9. Halpin, D. W. 1987. Adaptation of flexible manufacturing concepts to construction, in Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Building Construction, 704-717.
10. Jakimavicius, M.; Burinskiene, M. 2007. Automobile transport system analysis and ranking in Lithuanian administrative regions, Transport 22(3): 214-220.
11. Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Banaitis, A.; Šatkauskas, G. 2007. Defining the utility and market value of a real estate: a multiple criteria approach, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 11(2): 107-120.
12. Kaklauskas, A.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Raslanas, S.; Ginevičius, R.; Komka, A.; Malinauskas, P. 2006. Selection of low-e windows in retrofit of public buildings by applying multiple criteria method COPRAS: A Lithuanian case, Energy and Buildings 38(5): 454-462.
13. Kapliński, O. 1973. Analiza cyldicznych procesów budowlanych w warunkach stochastycznych [Analysis of cyclical construction processes in stochastic conditions], Archiwum Inżynierii Lqdowej [Archives of Civil Engineering] 19(1): 11-25.
14. Kapliński, O.1974. Zagadnienia koncentracji procesow budowlanych [The problems of concentration in the construction process], Archiwum Inzynierii Lqdowej [Archives of Civil Engineering] 20(4): 713-728.
15. Kapliński, O.1978. Harmonizacja cyklicznych procesów budowlanych w ujȩciu stochastycznym [Balancing the stochastic approach to the processes of cycling building], Poznań: Politechnika Poznańska. 166 s.
16. Kapliński, O. 1993. Diminishing non-uniformity of construction processes, Construction Management and Economics 11(1): 53-61.
17. Koźmiński, A. K.; Oblój, K. 1989. Zarys teorii równowagi organizacyjnej [A draft of the organizational balancing theory], Warsaw: PWE. 343 s.
18. Lewis, G. J.; Stewart, N. 2003. The measurement of environmental performance: an application of Ashby's law, System Research and Behavioral Science 20(1): 31-52.
19. Lucey, T. 1995. Management Information Systems, DP Publications Ltd.
20. Mandelbaum, M.; Buzacott, J. 1990. Flexibility and decision making, European journal of Operational Research 44(1): 17-27.
21. Mayer, Z.; Kazakidis, V. 2007. Decision making in flexible mine production system design using real options, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133(2): 169-180.
22. Morkvėnas, R.; Bivainis, J.; Jaržemskis, A. 2008. Assessment of employees knowledge potential in transport sector, Transport 23(3): 258-265.
23. Olsson, N. O. E. 2006. Management of flexibility in projects, International Journal of Project Management 24(1): 66-74.
24. Pereira, J.; Paulre, B. 2001. Flexibility in manufacturing systems: a relational and a dynamic approach, European Journal of Operational Research 130(1): 70-82.
25. Perminova, O.; Gustafsson, M.; Wikström, K. 2008. Defining uncertainty in projects - a new perspective, International Journal of Project Management 26(1): 73-79.
26. Piotrowski, W. 1996. Organizacje i zarzadzanie - kierunki, koncepcje, punkty widzenia [Organization and management: directions, concepts and positions on the discussed issue], in Zarzqdzanie. Teoria i praktyka [Management. Theory and practice], PWN, Warsaw, 551-690.
27. Reichelt, U. 1987. Einsatz flexibler Fertigungssysteme in der Betonindustrie, Betontechnik 8(3): 75-77.
28. Roy, B. 1990. Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji [Aided multi-criteria decision-making], Warsaw: WNT. 280 s.
29. Schewchuk, J. P.; Moodie, C. L. 1998. Definition and classification of manufacturing flexibility types and measures, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 10(4): 325-349.
30. Stabryla, A. 2005. Analiza elastyczności systemu jako instrument programowania zmian i rozwoju [Analysis of system flexibility as a tool for changing and developing the process programming], in Elastycznoś ć organizacji [Organizational flexibility]. Katowice: GWSH.
31. Su, C.-W; Cheng, M.-Y.; Lin, F.-B. 2006. Simulation enhanced approach ranking major transport projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 12(4): 285-291.
32. Telem, D.; Laufer, A.; Shapira, A. 2006. Only dynamics can absorb dynamics, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132(11): 1167-1177.
33. Thomas, H. R.; Horman, M. J. 2006. Fundamental principles of workforce management, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 132(1): 97-104.
34. Turskis, Z. 2008. Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(2): 224-239.
35. Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Zagorskas, J. 2006. Sustainable city compactness evaluation on the basis of GIS and Bayes rule, International Journal of Strategic Property Management 10(3): 185-207.
36. Upton, D. M. 1995. Flexibility as process mobility: the management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing, Journal of Operations Management 12(3): 205-224.
37. Volberda, H. W. 1999. Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive. Oxford University Press.
38. Zavadskas, E. K.; Zakarevicius, A.; Antucheviciene, J. 2006. Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions, Informatica 17(4): 601-618.
39. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Peldschus, E; Turskis, Z. 2007. Multi-attribute assessment of road design solution by using the COPRAS method, The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 2(4): 195-203.
40. Zavadskas, E. K.; Kaklauskas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Tamošaitiene, J. 2008. Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 14(2): 85-93.