Comparing active vision models

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 374-384

  de Croon, G C H E ^a   Sprinkhuizen Kuyper, I G ^b   Postma, E O ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Active vision; Behavioural approach; Probabilistic approach

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTS; STATE ESTIMATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ACTIVE VISION; ACTIVE VISION MODELS; BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH; BEHAVIOURAL MODELS; CLASSIFICATION TASKS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; PROBABILISTIC APPROACH; SENSORY INPUTS; VISION PROCESSES; VISUAL OBSERVATIONS; VISUAL TASKS;

PROBABILITY;

EID: 57949098406     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2008.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Denzler J., and Brown C. Information theoretic sensor data selection for active object recognition and state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24 (2002) 145-157
2. Aloimonos J., Weiss I., and Bandyopadhyay A. Active vision. International Journal of Computer Vision 1 4 (1988) 333-356
3. Ballard D.H. Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence 48 (1991) 57-86
4. Floreano D., Kato T., Marocco D., and Sauser E. Coevolution of active vision and feature selection. Biological Cybernetics 90 3 (2004) 218-228
5. Nolfi S., and Marocco D. Evolving robots able to visually discriminate between objects with different size. International Journal of Robotics and Automation 17 4 (2002) 163-170
6. Spier E. Behavioural categorisation: behaviour makes up for bad vision. In: Pollack J., Bedau M., Husbands P., Ikegami T., and Watson R. (Eds). Artificial Life IX: Proceedings of the Ninth Interational Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Life (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 133-138
7. Scheier C., Pfeifer R., and Kuniyoshi Y. Embedded neural networks: exploiting constraints. Neural Networks 11 7-8 (1998) 1551-1569
8. de Croon G., Postma E.O., and van den Herik H.J. A situated model for sensory-motor coordination in gaze control. Pattern Recognition Letters 27 (2006) 1181-1190
9. Arbel T., and Ferrie F. Entropy-based gaze planning. Image and Vision Computing 19 11 (2001) 779-786
10. Borotschnig H., Paletta L., Prantl M., and Pintz A. Appearance-based active object recognition. Image and Vision Computing 18 (2000) 715-727
11. L. Paletta, M. Prantl, A. Pinz, Reinforcement learning for autonomous three-dimensional object recognition, in: Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Intelligent Robotics Systems, Edinburgh, UK, 1998.
12. B.J.A. Kröse, R. Bunschoten, Probabilistic localization by appearance models and active vision, in: IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 1999, pp. 2255-2260.
13. Deutsch B., Zobel M., Denzler J., and Niemann H. Multi-step entropy based sensors control for visual object tracking. Pattern Recognition, 26th DAGM Symposium (2004), Springer, Berlin 359-366
14. Deinzer F., Denzler J., and Niemann H. Viewpoint selection - planning optimal sequences of views for object recognition. In: Petkov N., and Westenberg M. (Eds). Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, 10th International Conference, CAIP 2003 (2003), Springer, Groningen, The Netherlands 65-73
15. Schiele B., and Crowley J. Transinformation for active object recognition. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (1998), IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC 249-255
16. Beer R.D. The dynamics of active categorical perception in an evolved model agent. Adaptive Behavior 11 4 (2003) 209-243
17. van Dartel M.F., Sprinkhuizen-Kuyper I.G., Postma E.O., and van den Herik H.J. Reactive agents and perceptual ambiguity. Adaptive Behavior 13 3 (2005) 227-242
18. G. Hornby, S. Takamura, J. Yokono, O. Hanagata, M. Fujita, J. Pollack, Evolution of controllers from a high-level simulator to a high dof robot, in: Evolvable Systems: From Biology to Hardware, ICES, 2000, pp. 80-89.
19. M. Suzuki, J. v. Blij, D. Floreano, Omnidirectional active vision for evolutionary car driving, in: IAS, 2006, pp. 153-161.
20. J. Denzler, C. Brown, Optimal selection of camera parameters for state estimation of static systems: an information theoretic approach, Tech. rep., Computer Science Department, University of Rochester, 2000.
21. Borotschnig H., Paletta L., Prantl M., and Pinz A. A comparison of probabilistic, possibilistic and evidence theoretic fusion schemes for active object recognition. Computing 62 (1999) 293-319
22. J. Denzler, M. Zobel, H. Niemann, Information theoretic focal length selection for real-time active 3d object tracking, in: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2003, pp. 400-407.
23. Sutton R., and Barto A. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
24. Bäck T. Evolutionary Algorithms in Theory and Practice (1996), Oxford University Press, New York
25. Geusebroek J., Burghouts G., and Smeulders A. The Amsterdam library of object images. International Journal of Computer Vision 61 (2005) 103-112
26. Schiele B., and Crowley J. Transinformation of object recognition and its application to viewpoint planning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 21 (1997) 95-106
27. Murase H., and Nayar S. Visual learning and recognition of 3-D objects from appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision 14 (1995) 5-24
28. Partridge M., and Calvo R. Fast dimensionality reduction and simple PCA. Intelligent Data Analysis 2 (1998) 203-214
29. Cohen P. Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
30. Cover T., and Thomas J. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley Series in Telecommunications (1991), Wiley, New York