Real-time visual feedback for learning to perform short rhythms with expressive variations in timing and loudness

Journal of New Music Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 207-220

  Sadakata, Makiko ^a   Hoppe, David ^a   Brandmeyer, Alex ^a   Timmers, Renee ^a   Desain, Peter ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57949090493     PISSN: 09298215     EISSN: 17445027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09298210802322401     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Brandmeyer, A., Timmers, Sadakata, M. & Desain, P. (submitted). Learning of expressive percussion performance under different visual feedback conditions.
2. Cohen, A., Ivry. R.I. & Keele, S.W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 7(5(1), 17-30.
3. Danneberg, R.B., Sanchez, M., Joseph, A., Joseph, R., Saul, R. & Capell, P. (1990). A computer-based multimedia tutor for beginning piano students. Journal of New Music Research, 19, 155-173.
4. Desain, P. & Honing, H. (1992). Music, mind and machine: studies in computer music, music cognition and artificial intelligence. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
5. Desain, P. & Honing, H. (2003). The formation of rhythmic categories and metric priming. Perception, 32(3), 341-365.
6. Dickey, M.R. (1992). A review of research on modeling in music teaching and learning. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 113, 27-40.
7. Eitan, Z. & Granot, R.Y. (2006). How music moves: musical parameters and listeners' images of motion. Music Perception, 23(3), 221-247.
8. Gabrielsson, A. (1999). The performance of music. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 501-602). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Gabrielsson, A. (2003). Music performance research at the millennium. Psychology of Music, 31(3), 221-272.
10. Heuer, H. & Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Transfer of learning among motor patterns with different relative timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance, 14(2), 241-252.
11. Hirata, Y. (2004). Computer assisted pronunciation training for native english speakers learning Japanese pitch and durational contrasts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3-4), 357-376.
12. Honing, H. (1990). Poco: an environment for analyzing, modifying, and generating expression in music. Paper presented at the 1990 International Computer Music Conference, San Francisco.
13. Howard, D.M. & Welch, G.F. (1993). Visual-displays for the assessment of vocal pitch matching development. Applied Acoustics, 39(4), 235-252.
14. Howard, D.M., Welch, G.F., Brereton, J., Himonides, E., DeCosta, M., Williams, J. & Howard, A.W. (2004). Winsingad: a real-time display for the singing studio. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 29, 135-144.
15. Juslin, P.N., Friberg, A. & Bresin, R. (2002). Toward a computational model of expression in music performance: the GERM model. Musicae Scientiae, Special issue, 2001-2, 63-122.
16. Marcus, G.F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S.B. & Vishton, P.M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283(5398), 77-80.
17. Maye, J., Werker, J.F. & Gerken, L. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82(3), B101-B111.
18. Meyer, R.K. & Palmer, C. (2003). Temporal and motor transfer in music performance. Music Perception, 21(1), 81-104.
19. Paas, F., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1-2), 1-8.
20. Palmer, C. & Meyer, R.K. (2000). Conceptual and motor learning in music performance. Psychological Science, 11(1), 63-68.
21. Parzen, E. (1962). Estimation of a probability density-function and mode. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(3), 1065-1076.
22. Riley, K. (2002). Understanding piano playing through midi: students' perspectives on performance analysis and learning. American Music Teacher, June/July, 33-37.
23. Robertson, I. (2000). Imitative problem solving: why transfer of learning often fails to occur. Instructional Science, 28(4), 263-289.
24. Rossiter, D., Howard, D.M. & DeCosta, M. (1996). Voice development under training with and without the influence of real-time visually presented biofeedback. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(5), 3253-3256.
25. Sadakata, M. (2006). Ritme and Rizumu: studies in music cognition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
26. Sadakata, M., Desain, P. & Honing, H. (2006). The bayesian way to relate rhythm perception and production. Music Perception, 23(3), 267-286.
27. Sang, R.C. (1987). A study of the relationship between instrumental music teachers' modeling skills and pupil performance behaviors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 91, 151-159.
28. Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. Scruggs, T.E. & Mastropieri, M.A. (1988). Acquisition and transfer of learning-strategies by gifted and non-gifted students. Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 153-166.
30. Seashore, C.E. (1938). Psychology of music (1st ed.). New York, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.
31. Sloboda, J.A. (1996). The acquisition of musical performance expertise: Deconstructing the "Talent" Account of individual differences of musical expressivity. In K.A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: the acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 107-126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Smoliar, S.W., Walterworth, J.A. & Kellock, P.R. (1995). Pianoforte: a system for piano education beyond notation literacy. Paper presented at the ACM Multimedia 95, San Francisco, CA.
33. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem-solving - effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
34. Tait, M. (1992). Teaching strategies and styles. In R. Colwell (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 525-534). New York: Schirmer.
35. Timmers, R. (2005). Predicting the similarity between expressive performances of music from measurements of tempo and dynamics. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 117(1), 391-399.
36. Tucker, W.H., Bates, R.H.T., Frykberg, S.D., Howarth, R.J., Kennedy, W.K., Lamb, M.R. & Vaughan, R.G. (1977). An interactive aid for musicians. Man-machine Studies, 9, 635-651.
37. Welch, G.F. (1985). A schema theory of how children learn to sing in tune. Psychology of Music, 13, 3-18.
38. Welch, G.F., Himonides, E., Howard, D.M. & Brereton, J. (2004). Voxed: technology as a meaningful teaching aid in the singing studio. Paper presented at the Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology, Graz, Austria.
39. Welch, G.F., Howard, A.W., Himonides, E. & Brereton, J. (2005). Real-time feedback in the singing studio: an innovatory action-research project using new voice technology. Music Education Research, 7, 225-249.
40. Welch, G.F., Rush, C. & Howard, D.M. (1989). Real-time visual feedback in the development of vocal pitch accuracy in singing. Psychology of Music, 13, 3-18.
41. Windsor, W.L. & Clarke, E.F. (1997). Expressive timing and dynamics in real and artificial musical performance: using an algorithm as an analytical tool. Music Perception, 15(2), 127-152.