Roles of quantified expressions of building performance assessment in facility procurement and management

Building and Environment

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 773-784

  Pati, Debajyoti ^a   Park, Cheol Soo ^b   Augenbroe, Godfried ^c  

^a HKS Architects   (United States)

^b Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Building evaluation; Design evolution; Facility portfolio management; Performance indicator; Stakeholder dialogue

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; BUILDINGS; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; INVESTMENTS; PAPER; WASTE DISPOSAL;

BUILDING EVALUATION; DESIGN EVOLUTION; FACILITY/PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE INDICATOR; STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; BIOPHYSICS; BUILDING; DECISION MAKING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 57849166189     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.06.018     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Koskela L. An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Doctoral dissertation. VTT Building Technology, VTT Publications 408; 2000.
2. Foliente G. Developments in performance-based building codes and standards. Forest Products Journal 50 7/8 (2000) 12-21
3. Saarinen T.F. Extent of application of environment-behavior-design research: a mid-eighties assessment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 12 2 (1995) 166-174
4. Winkel G.H. Implications of environmental context for validity assessments. In: Stokols D., and Altman I. (Eds). Handbook of environmental psychology (1987), Wiley, New York 71-97
5. ASTM. ASTM Standards on Whole Building Functionality and Serviceability (2000), ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
6. Szigeti F., and Davis G. Functionality and serviceability standards: tools for stating functional requirements and for evaluating facilities. Federal Facilities Council, Technical Report 145. Learning from our buildings: a state-of-the-art practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA
7. Fanger P.O. Thermal comfort (1970), Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen
8. NEN 2916. NEN 2916: energy performance of non-residential buildings - determination method. Available on-line at (1999), Dutch Normalization Institute (NEN), The Netherlands Standardization Institute. http://www.enper.org/index.htm?/pub/codes/codes.htm [accessed March 2004]
9. NEMA. Procedure for determining luminaire efficacy ratings for fluorescent luminaires. National Electrical Manufacturers Association Standards publication LE5-2001; 2001.
10. IESNA. Lighting handbook (2000), Illuminating Engineering Society of North America
11. Chauvel P., Collins J.B., Dogniaux R., and Longmore J. Glare from windows: current views of the problem. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 14 1 (1982) 31-46
12. ASHRAE. ASHRAE fundamentals (2005), ASHRAE
13. ASHRAE. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy (ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004); 2004.
14. Fanger P.O., and Christensen N.K. Perception of draught in ventilated spaces. Ergonomics 29 2 (1986) 215-235
15. Heiselberg P. Draught risk from cold vertical surfaces. Building and Environment 29 3 (1994) 297-301
16. Friedman G. Too hot too cold: diagnosing occupant complaints. ASHRAE Journal 46 1 (2004) 157-163
17. Shohet I.M., Lavy-Leibovich S., and Bar-On D. Integrated maintenance monitoring of hospital buildings. Construction Management and Economics 21 2 (2003) 219-228
18. Chan K.T., Lee R.H.K., and Burnett J. Maintenance performance: a case study of hospitality engineering systems. Facilities 19 13/14 (2001) 494-503
19. Barber F., and Hilberg G. Comprehensive maintenance program ensures reliable operation. Power Engineering 99 12 (1995) 27-31
20. Augenbroe GLM, Park CS. Towards a maintenance performance toolkit for GSA - interim report submitted to GSA. Available on-line at http://www.publicarchitecture.gatech.edu/Research/project/gsatoolkit.htm; 2002 [accessed March 2008].
21. Wineman J.D. Office design and evaluation: an overview. Environment and Behaviour 14 5 (1982) 271-298
22. Ne'eman E., Sweitzer G., and Vine E. Office worker response to lighting and daylighting issues in workspace environments: a pilot survey. Energy and Buildings 6 22 (1984) 159-171
23. Jones B.W., Hsieh K., and Hashinaga M. The effect of air velocity on thermal comfort at moderate activity levels. ASHRAE Transactions 92 2 (1986) 761-772
24. Preiser W.F.E. The evolution of post-occupancy evaluation: toward building performance and universal design evaluation (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
25. Vischer J. Post-occupancy evaluation: a multifaceted tool for building improvement (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
26. Pati D. Maximizing the benefits of courtroom POEs in design decision support and academia inquiry through a unified conceptual model. Doctoral dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology; 2005.
27. AOUSC.U.S. Courts design guide; 1998.
28. Park CS, Augenbroe GLM, Shohet I. Summit, workshop and medium scale benchmarking - interim report submitted to GSA; 2004.
29. CEN. Standard EN15251: indoor environmental parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings-addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics (2007), CEN, Brussels
30. de Dear R, Brager G, Cooper D. Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference, Final report ASHRAE RP-884; 1997.
31. Brager G., and de Dear R. A standard for natural ventilation. ASHRAE Journal 42 10 (2000) 21-27
32. Wyon D.P. Indoor environmental effects on productivity. IAQ 96 paths to better building environments/keynote address (1996), ASHRAE, Y. Kevin, Atlanta 5-15
33. Milton D.K., Glencross P.M., and Walters M.D. Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. Indoor Air 10 4 (2000) 212-221
34. Wargocki P., Wyon D.P., Sundell J., Clausen G., and Fanger P.O. The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) Symptoms and Productivity. Indoor Air 10 4 (2000) 222-236
35. Fisk WJ, Seppanen O, Faulkner D, Huang J. Economizer system cost effectiveness: accounting for the influence of ventilation rate on sick leave. In: Proceedings of ISIAQ 7th international conference healthy buildings, Singapore, 7-12 December 2003, vol. 3; 2003. p. 361-67.
36. Hazelrigg G.A. Validation of engineering design alternative selection method. Journal of Engineering Optimization 35 2 (2003) 103-120