Multiphase non-Newtonian effects on pulsatile hemodynamics in a coronary artery

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 803-825

  Kim, Yong Hyun ^a   VandeVord, Pamela J ^a   Lee, Joon Sang ^a  

^a Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational method; Coronary artery; Hemodynamics; Non Newtonian flow; RBC accumulation; Rheology

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; BLOOD VESSELS; COLLOIDS; DIELECTRIC DEVICES; ELASTICITY; FLUID DYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LIQUIDS; NEWTONIAN FLOW; NEWTONIAN LIQUIDS; NON NEWTONIAN FLOW; PLASTICITY; PULSATILE FLOW; RHEOLOGY; SECONDARY FLOW; SHEAR STRESS; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRESSES; VISCOSITY;

BLOOD FLOWS; CORONARY ARTERY; CRITICAL FACTORS; MECHANICAL FACTORS; NEWTONIAN FLUID MODELS; NEWTONIAN FLUIDS; NEWTONIAN MODELS; NEWTONIAN VISCOSITIES; NEWTONIANS; RBC ACCUMULATION; RED BLOOD CELLS; VASCULAR DISEASES; WALL SHEAR STRESSES;

HEMODYNAMICS;

EID: 57849125887     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1768     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Papaharilaou Y, Ekaterinaris JA, Manousaki E, Katsamouris AN. Stress analysis in abdominal aortic aneurysms applying flow induced wall pressure. Fifth GRACM International Congress on Computational Mechanics, Limassol, 29 June-1 July 2005.
2. Feldman CL, Stone PH. Intravascular hemodynamic factors responsible for progression of coronary atherosclerosis and development of vulnerable plaque. Current Opinion in Cardiology 2000; 15(6):430-440.
3. Tiwari P. Multifield computational fluid dynamics model of particulate flow in curved circular tubes. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 2004; 18:205-220.
4. Dwyer HA, Cheer AY, Rutaganira T, Shacheraghi N. Calculation of unsteady flows in curved pipes. Journal of Fluids Engineering 2001; 123:869-877.
5. Peattie RA, Riehle TJ, Bluth EI. Pulsatile flow in fusiform models of abdominal aortic aneurysms: flow fields, velocity patterns and flow-induced wall stresses. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 2004; 126:438-446.
6. Wahle A, Mitchell SC, Ramaswamy SD, Chandran KB, Sonka M. Four-dimensional coronary morphology and computational hemodynamics. Medical Imaging 2001; 4322:743-754.
7. Ku D. Blood flow in artery. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 1997; 29:399-434.
8. Berger S, Jou L. Flows in stenotic vessels. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2000; 32:347-382.
9. Pedley TJ. The Fluid Mechanics of Large Blood Vessels. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1980.
10. Cho YI, Kensey KR. Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part I: steary flows. Biorheology 1991; 28:241-262.
11. Box FM, van der Geest RJ, Rutten MC, Reiber JH. The influence of flow, vessel diameter, and non-Newtonian blood viscosity on the wall shear stress in a carotid bifurcation model for unsteady flow. Investigative Radiology 2005; 40:277-294.
12. Fahraeus R, Lindqist T. The viscosity of the blood in narrow capillary tubes. American Journal of Physiology 1931; 96(3):562-568.
13. Widmaier EP, Raff H, Strang KT. Vander, Sherman, Luciano's Human Physiology: The Mechanisms of Body Function. McGraw-Hill: New York, 2004.
14. Lightfoot EN. Transport Phenomena and Living Systems: Biomedical Aspects of Momentum and Mass Transport. Wiley: New York, 1974.
15. Tateshima S, Murayama Y, Villablanca JP, Morino T, Nomura K, Tanishita K, Vinuela F. In vitro measurement of fluid-induced wall shear stress in unruptured cerebral aneurysms Harboring Blebs. Stroke 2003; 34:187-192.
16. Kerber CW, Imbesi SG, Knox K. Flow dynamics in a lethal anterior communicating artery aneurysm. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1999; 20:2000-2003.
17. Imbesi SG, Kerber CW. Analysis of slipstream flow in two unruptured intracranial cerebral aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology 1999; 20:1703-1705.
18. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatirick D. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. Journal of Biomechanics 2004; 37:709-720.
19. Johnston BM, Johnston PR, Corney S, Kilpatirick D. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: transient simulations. Journal of Biomechanics 2006; 39:1116-1128.
20. Jung J, Lyczkowski RW, Panchal CB, Hassanein A. Multiphase hemodynamic simulation on pulsatile flow in a coronary artery. Journal of Biomechanics 2006; 39:2064-2073.
21. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Arterial wall shear and distribution of early atheroma in man. Nature 1969; 233:1159-1161.
22. Ohta M, Wetzel SG, Dantan P, Bachelet C, Lovblad KO, Yilmaz H, Flaud P, Rüfenacht DA. Rheological changes after stenting of a cerebral aneurysm: a finite element modeling approach. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 2005; 28:768-772.
23. Gruttola SD, Boomsma K, Poulikakos D, Ventikos Y. Computational simulation of a non-Newtonian model of the blood separation process. Artificial Organs 2005; 29:949-959.
24. Santamarina A, Weydahl E, Siegel Jr JM, Moore Jr JE. Computational analysis of flow I a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effect of time-varying curvature. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1998; 26:944-954.
25. Komai Y, Tanishita K. Fully developed intermittent flow in a curved tube. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1997; 347:263-287.
26. Van Meerveld J, Waters SL. Numerical computation of the steady secondary flow in a tube with time-dependent curvature. Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 2001; 54:631-640.
27. Buchanan JR, Kleinstreuer C, Comer JK. Rheological effects on pulsatile hemodynamics in a stenosed tube. Computers and Fluids 2001; 29:695-724.
28. Gonzalez HA, Moraga NO. On predicting unsteady non-Newtonian blood flow. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005; 170:909-923.
29. Gidaspow D. Multiphase Flow and Fluidization: Continuum and Kinetic Theory Descriptions. Academic Press: New York, 1994.
30. Gijsen FJH, Allanic E, van de Vosse FN, Janssen JD. The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: unsteady flow in a 90 curved tube. Journal of Biomechanics 1999; 32:705-713.
31. Wonjnaowski J. Numerical study of bileaf heart valves performance. International Scientific Practical Conference: Efficiency of Engineering Education in XX Century, Donetsk, Ukraine, May 2001; 29-31.
32. Eckmann DM, Bowers S, Stecker M, Cheung AT. Hematocrit, volume expander, temperature, and shear rate effects on blood viscosity. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2000; 91:539-545.
33. FLUENT 6.2 User's Guide. Fluent Inc., 2005.
34. GAMBIT 2.3 User's Guide. Fluent Inc., 2005.
35. Ding J, Lyczkowski RW, Sha WT. Modeling of concentrated liquid-solids flow in pipes displaying shear-thinning phenomena. Chemical Engineering Communications 1995; 138:145-155.
36. Myers JG, Moore JA, Ojha M, Johnston KW, Ethier CR. Factors influencing blood flow patterns in the human right coronary artery. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2001; 29:109-120.
37. Perktold K, Hofer M, Rappitsch G, Loew M, Kuban BD, Friedman MH. Validated computation of physiologic flow in a realistic coronary artery branch. Journal of Biomechanics 1998; 31:217-228.
38. Perktold K, Kenner TH. Flow and stress characteristics in rigid walled and compliant carotid artery bifurcation models. Medical-Biological Engineering - Computing, Graz, Austria, 1993; 1-20.
39. Ernst W, Leonid G, Ulrich K, Klaus A. In-vivo coronary flow profiling based on biplane angiograms: influence of geometric simplifications on the three-dimensional reconstruction and wall shear stress calculation. Biomedical Engineering Online 2006; 5:39.
40. Rindt CCM, van Steenhoven AA, Janssen JD, Vosser G. Unsteady entrance flow in a 90 curved tube. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1991; 226:445-474.
41. Schmid-Schonbein H, Wells R, Goldstone J. Influence of deformability of human red cells upon blood viscosity. Circulation Research 1969; 25:131-143.
42. Stary HC. Atlas of Atherosclerosis: Progression and Regression. Parthenon Publishing: New York, 1999.