Is it time to look beyond teachers' signing behavior?

Educating Deaf Students: Global Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 40-54

  Akamatsu, C Tane ^a   Stewart, David ^b   Mayer, Connie ^c  

^a TORONTO DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD   (Canada)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57849089539     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Akamatsu, C. T., Stewart, D., & Becker, B. (2000). Documenting English syntactic development in face to face signed communication. American Annals of the Deaf, 145, 442-453.
2. Akamatsu, C. T., & Stewart, D. (1998). Constructing simultaneous communication: The contributions of natural sign language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 302-319.
3. Berent, G. (1996). The acquisition of English syntax by deaf learners. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 469-506). San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Bragg, B. (1990). Communication and the deaf community: Where do we go from here? In M. Garretson (Ed.), Eyes, hands, voices: Communication issues among deaf people (pp. 9-14). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.
5. Drasgow, E., & Paul, P. (1995). A critical analysis of the use of MCE systems with deaf students: A review of the literature. ACEHI/ACEDA, 21, 80-93.
6. Fischer, S. (1998). Critical periods for language acquisition: Consequences for deaf education. In A. Weisel (Ed.). Issues unresolved: New perspectives on language and deaf education (pp. 9-26). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
7. Gee, J., & Goodhart, W., (1988). American Sign Language and the human biological capacity for language. In M. Strong (Ed.), Language learning and deafness (pp. 49-74). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Gee, J., & Mounty, J. (1991). Nativization, variability, and style shifting in the sign language development of deaf children of hearing parents. In P. Siple and S. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research: Psychology (pp. 65-84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Gilman, L., Davis, J., & Raffin, M. (1980). Use of common morphemes by hearing impaired children exposed to a system of manual English. Journal of Auditory Research, 20, 57-69.
10. Gonter-Gaustad, M. (1986). Longitudinal effects of manual English instruction on deaf children's morphological skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 101-128.
11. Hatfield, N., Caccamise, F., & Siple, P. (1978). Deaf students' language competency: A bilingual perspective. American Annals of the Deaf, 123, 847-851.
12. Hoffmeister, R. J. (2000). A piece of the puzzle: ASL and reading comprehension in deaf children. In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Morford, and R. I. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp. 143-163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Hyde, M., & Power, D. (1991). Teachers' use of simultaneous communication: Effects on the sign and spoken components. American Annals of the Deaf, 136, 381-387.
14. Johnson, R., Liddell, S., & Erting, C. (1989). Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education (Working Paper No. 89-3). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, Gallaudet Research Institute.
15. Kluwin, T. (1981). The grammaticality of manual representations of English in classroom settings. American Annals of the Deaf, 126, 417-421.
16. Lucas, C., & Valli, C. (1989). Language contact in the American deaf community. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of the deaf community (pp. 11-40). New York: Academic Press.
17. Lucas, C., & Valli, C. (1992). Language contact in the American Deaf community. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Luetke-Stahlman, B. (1988a). Documenting syntactically and semantically incomplete bimodal input to hearing impaired subjects. American Annals of the Deaf, 133, 230-234.
19. Luetke-Stahlman, B. (1988b). Educational ramifications of various instructional inputs for hearing impaired students. Association of Canadian Educators of the Hearing Impaired Journal, 14, 105-121.
20. Lytle, R., & Rovins, M. (1997). Reforming deaf education: A paradigm shift from how to teach to what to teach. American Annals of the Deaf, 142, 7-15.
21. Marmor, G., & Petitto, L. (1979). Simultaneous communication in the classroom: How well is English grammar represented? Sign Language Studies, 23, 99-136.
22. Maxwell, M. (1983). Simultaneous communication in the classroom: What do deaf children learn? Sign Language Studies, 39, 95-112.
23. Maxwell, M. (1990). Simultaneous communication: The state of the art and proposals for change. Sign Language Studies, 69, 333-390.
24. Maxwell, M., & Bernstein, M. (1985). The synergy of sign and speech in simultaneous communication. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 63-81.
25. Maxwell, M., Bernstein, M., & Maer, K. (1991). Bimodal language production. In P. Siple and S. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research: Psychology (pp. 171-190). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Mayer, C. (1999a). Shaping at the point of utterance: An investigation of the composing processes of the deaf student writer. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 37-49.
27. Mayer, C. (1999b). Using what is to hand, to eye, to ear, and to mind: A theory of the deaf writer's meaning making. Unpublished Ed.D. Thesis, The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
28. Mayer, C., & Akamatsu, C. T. (1999). Bilingual-bicultural models of literacy education for deaf students: Considering the claims. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 4, 1-8 (originally published in the Australian Journal of Education of the Deaf, 2, 5-9).
29. Mayer, C., & Akamatsu, C. T. (2000). Deaf children creating written texts: Contributions of American Sign Language and signed forms of English. American Annals of the Deaf, 145, 394-403.
30. Mayer, C., & Wells, G. (1996). Can the linguistic interdependence theory support a bilingual-bicultural model of literacy education for deaf students? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 93-107.
31. Mayer, P., & Lowenbraun, S. (1990). Total communication use among elementary teachers of hearing impaired children. American Annals of the Deaf, 135, 257-263.
32. Moores, D. (2001). Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles and practices, (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Moores, D., Kluwin, T., Johnson, R., Cox, P., Blennerhassett, L., Kelly, L., Sweet, C., & Fields, L. (1987). Factors predictive of literacy in deaf adolescents in total communication programs. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
34. Moores, D., & Sweet, C. (1990). Factors predictive of school achievement. In D. Moores and K. Meadow-Orlans (Eds.), Educational and developmental aspects of deafness. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
35. Newell, W., Stinson, M., Castle, D., Mallery-Ruganis, D., & Holcomb, B. R. (1990). Simultaneous communication: A description by deaf professionals working in an educational setting. Sign Language Studies, 69, 391-413.
36. Padden, C., & Ramsey, C. (2000). American Sign Language and reading ability in deaf children. In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Morford, and R. I. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp. 165-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Paul, P. (1998). Literacy and deafness: The development of reading, writing, and literate thought. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38. Quigley, S., & Paul, P. (1984). Language and deafness. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
39. Reich, P., & Bick, M. (1977). How visible is visible English? Sign Language Studies, 14, 59-72.
40. Singleton, J., Supalla, S., Litchfield, S., & Schley, S. (1998). From sign to word: Considering modality constraints in ASL/English bilingual education. Topics in Language Disorders, 18, 16-29.
41. Stewart, D. (1993). Bi-Bi to MCE? American Annals of the Deaf, 138, 331-337.
42. Stewart, D., Akamatsu, C. T., & Becker, B. (1995). Aiming for consistency in the way teachers sign. American Annals of the Deaf, 140, 314-323.
43. Stewart, D. A., Akamatsu, C. T., & Bonkowski, N. (1990). Synergy effects: Sign driven and speech driven simultaneous communication (pp.235-242). In W. H. Edmondson and F. Karlsson (Eds.), SLR '87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research.
44. Stewart, D., & Kluwin, T. (2001). Teaching deaf and hard of hearing students. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers 8. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo Press.
46. Stokoe, W. (1976). Dictionary of American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
47. Strong, M., & Charlson, E. (1987). Simultaneous communication: Are teachers attempting an impossible task? American Annals of the Deaf, 132, 376-382.
48. Strong, M., & Prinz, P. M. (1997). A study of the relationship between American Sign Language and English literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 2, 37-46.
49. Supalla, S. (1991). Manually coded English: The modality question in signed language development. In P. Siple and S. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in signed language research, Vol. 2: Psychology (pp. 85-109). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Suty, K., & Friel-Patti, S. (1982). Looking beyond signed English to describe the language of two deaf children. Sign Language Studies, 35, 153-168.
51. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
52. Wodlinger-Cohen, R. (1991). The manual representation of speech by deaf children, their mothers, and their teachers. In P. Siple and S. Fischer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research: Psychology (pp. 149-169). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53. Woodward, J. (1973). Some characteristics of Pidgin MCE. Sign Language Studies, 3, 39-46.
54. Woodward, J. (1990). Sign English in the education of Deaf students. In H. Bornstein (Ed.), Manual communication in America (pp. 67-80). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
55. Woodward, J., & Allen, T. (1988). Classroom use of artificial sign systems by teachers. Sign Language Studies, 61, 405-418.