Acoustic based structural health monitoring for composites using optimal sensor placement: analysis and experiments

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 83-97

  Das, Santanu ^a   Chattopadhyay, Aditi ^a   Xu Zhou, ^a  

^a AZ 85281   (United States)

Author keywords

attenuation coefficient; delamination; detection criteria; optimal sensor placement; sensing region; structural health monitoring.; wave propagation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ACTUATORS; CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; DELAMINATION; EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH; MONITORING; PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS; SENSORS; STEEL SHEET; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS); WAVE PROPAGATION;

ATTENUATION COEFFICIENT; COMPOSITE LAMINATES; DELAMINATED STRUCTURES; DETECTION CRITERIA; EXCITATION INTENSITIES; EXPERIMENTAL DATUMS; GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS; HOST STRUCTURES; LOCAL EFFECTS; MATERIAL PROPERTIES; OF SENSORS; OPTIMAL NUMBERS; OPTIMAL PLACEMENTS; OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT; OPTIMAL SENSORS; PARAMETRIC STUDIES; PIEZOELECTRIC SENSORS AND ACTUATORS; SENSING REGION; SENSOR APPLICATIONS;

SENSOR NETWORKS;

EID: 57849085276     PISSN: 07316844     EISSN: 15307964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0731684407084099     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Padula, S.L. and Kincaid, R.K. (1999). Optimization Strategies for Sensor and Actuator Placement, NASA/ TM-1999-209126.
2. Carr, R.D., Greenberg, H.J., Hart, W.E. and Phillips, C.A. (1994). Addressing Modeling Uncertainties in Sensor Placement for Community Water Supply, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 174 (5). 617-639.
3. Ding, Y., Kim, P., Ceglarek, D. and Jin, J. (2003). Optimal Sensor Distribution for Variation Diagnosis in Multistation Assembly Processes, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19 (4). 543-556.
4. Ganesan, D., Cristescu, R. and Beferull-Lozano, B. (2004). Power Efficient Sensor Placement and Transmission Structure for Data Gathering under Distortion Constraints, IPSN'04, April 26-27, Berkeley, California, USA. Copyright 2004 ACM 1-58113-846-6/04/0004.
5. Worden, K. and Burrows, A.P. (2001). Optimal Sensor Placement for Fault Detection, ELSEVIER, Engineering Structures, 23: 885-901.
6. Staszewski, W.J. and Worden, K. (2001). An Overview of Optimal Sensor Location Methods for Damage Detection, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 4326, 23, March 5-8.
7. Raich, A.M. and Liszkai, T.R. (2003). Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm Methodology for Optimizing Sensor Layouts to Enhance Structural Damage Identification, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, Stanford CA, Sept. 15-17, pp. 650-657.
8. Okure, M.A.E. and Peshkin, M.A. (1994). Quantitative Evaluation of Neural Networks for NDE Applications using the ROC Curve, 21st Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Snowmass CO.
9. Yam, L.H., Yan, Y.J. and Jiang, J.S. (2003). Vibration Based Damage Detection for Composite Structures Using Wavelet Transform and Neural Network Identification, ELSEVIER, Composite Structures, 60: 403-412.
10. Lei, Y., Kiremidjian, A.S., Nair, K.K., Lynch, J.P. and Law, K.H. (2003). An Enhanced Statistical Damage Detection Algorithm Using Time Series Analysis, in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford University, Stanford CA, Sept. 15-17, pp. 1209-1214.
11. Kay, S.M. (1993). Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Vol. 2, Detection Theory, Prentice Hall PTR.