Explaining democratic quality: How relevant is the authoritarian legacy?;Explicar la calidad democrática: ¿qué tan relevantes son las tradiciones autoritarias?

Revista de Ciencia Politica

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 3-22

  Morlino, Leonardo ^a  

^a Istituto Italiano di Scienze Umane   (Italy)

Author keywords

Authoritarianism; Democracy; Legacy; Quality; Transition

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749168079     PISSN: 07161417     EISSN: 0718090X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4067/S0718-090X2007000300001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agüero, Felipe. 2004. “Authoritarian Legacies: The Military’s Role”. En Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe, editado por K. Hite y P. Cesarini. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 233-262.
2. Aguilar, Paloma. 2001. “Justice, Politics and Memory in the Spanish Transition”. En The Politics of Memory. Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies, editado por A. Barahona De Brito, C.G. Enríquez y P. Aguilar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92-119.
3. Altman, David y Aníbal Pérez-Liñán. 2001. “Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in 18 Latin American Countries”, Democratization 9(2): 85-100.
4. Bendix, Reinhard. 1984. Force, Fate and Freedom: an Historical Sociology. Berkeley: University of California.
5. Bermeo, Nancy. 1992. “Democracy and the Lessons of Dictatorship”. Comparative Politics 24(3): 273-291.
6. Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing democracy: toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Diamond, Larry y Leonardo Morlino (comp). 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Eulau, Heinz y Paul Karps. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness”. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233-254.
9. Habermas, Jurgen. 1981. Theorie des Kommunikativen Handels, Bd. 1, Handlungsrationalität und Gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
10. Hagopian, Frances. 1995. “After Regime Change: Authoritarian Legacies, Political Representation and the Democratic Future of South America“. World Politics 45 (April): 464-500.
11. Hite, Katherine y Leonardo Morlino. 2004. “Problematizing the Links between Authoritarian Legacies and ‘Good’ Democracy”. En Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe, editado por K. Hite e P. Cesarini. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 25-84.
12. Karatnycky, Adrian. 2004. “The 2003 Freedom House Survey”. Journal of Democracry 15(1): 82-93.
13. Karl, T. y Ph. C. Schmitter. 1991. “Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern Europe and Eastern Europe”. International Social Science Journal. 128 (May): 269-284.
14. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Linz, Juan y Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Maravall, José María. 1981. La Política de la Transición 1975‑80. Madrid: Taurus.
17. Merkel, Wolfgang y Aurel Croissant. 2000. “Formal Institutions and Informal Rules of Defective Democracies“. Central European Political Science Review 1(2): 31-47.
18. Morlino, Leonardo. 1998. Democracy Between Consolidation and Crisis. Parties, Groups and Citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Morlino, Leonardo. 2003. Democrazie e democratizzazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.
20. Morlino, Leonardo. 2005. “Le qualità democratiche: indicatori e misure”. No publicado.
21. Munck, Gerardo y Carol Skalnik. 1997. “Modes of Transition and Democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective”. Comparative Politics 29(3): 343-362.
22. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. Counterpoint: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
23. Pereira Anthony y Mark Ungar. 2004. “The Persistence of the Mano Dura: Authoritarian Legacies and Policing in Brazil and Southern Cone”. En Authoritarian legacies and democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe, editado por K. Hite e P. Cesarini. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 263-304.
24. Payne, Leigh. 2000. Uncivil Movements: The Armed Right Wing and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Pridham, Geoffrey. 2000. The Dynamics of Democratization: a Comparative Approach. London, New York: Continuum.
26. Puddington, Arch. 2007. “The 2006 Freedom House Survey”. Journal of Democracy 18(2): 125-137.
27. Sartori, Giovanni. 1957. Democrazie e Definizioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.
28. Schedler, Andreas. 1999. “Conceptualizing Accountability“. En The Self-restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, editado por A. Schedler, L.J. Diamond y M. Plattner. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 14-17.
29. Schmitter, Philippe. 1999. “The Limits of horizontal accountability“. En The Self-restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, editado por A. Schedler, L.J. Diamond y M. Plattner. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 59-62.