Coherence and coreference revisited

Journal of Semantics

Volumn 25, Issue 1 SPEC. ISS., 2008, Pages 1-44

  Kehler, Andrew ^a   Kertz, Laura ^a   Rohde, Hannah ^a   Elman, Jeffrey L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749143659     PISSN: 01675133     EISSN: 14774593     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffm018     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akmajian, A. & R. S. Jackendoff (1970), 'Coreferentiality and stress'. Linguistic Inquiry 1:124-6.
2. Arnold, J. (2001), 'The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation'. Discourse Processes 21 137-62.
3. Beaver, D. I. (2004), 'The optimization of discourse anaphora'. Linguistics and Philosophy 27:3-56.
4. Caramazza, A., E. Grober, C. Garvey, & J. Yates (1977), 'Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns'. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 16: 601-9.
5. Chambers, C. C. & R. Smyth (1998), 'Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of centering theory'. Journal of Memory and Language 39: 593-608.
6. Crawley, R. A., R. J. Stevenson, & D. Kleinman (1990), 'The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns'. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19:245-64.
7. Crinean, M. & A. Garnham (2006), 'Implicit causality, implicit consequentiality, and semantic roles'. Language and Cognitive Processes 21:636-48.
8. de Hoop, H. (2004), 'On the interpretation of stressed pronouns'. In R. Blutner and H. Zeevat (eds.), Optimality Theory and Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan. New York. 25-41.
9. Ehrlich, K. (1980), 'Comprehension of pronouns'. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32:247-55.
10. Garvey, C., A. Caramazza, & J. Yates (1976), 'Factors underlying assignment of pronoun antecedents'. Cognition 3: 227-43.
11. Gordon, P. C. & K. A. Scearce (1995), 'Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation'. Memory and Cognition 23:313-23.
12. Gundel, J. K., N. Hedberg, & R. Zacharski (1993), 'Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse'. Language 69 274-307.
13. Hale, J. (2001), 'A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model'. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. The Association for Computational Linguistics. Morristown, NJ. 159-66.
14. Hobbs, J. R. (1979), 'Coherence and coreference'. Cognitive Science 3:67-90.
15. Hobbs, J. R. (1990), Literature and Cognition. CSLI Lecture Notes 21. Stanford, CA.
16. Hume, D. 1748), An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. The Liberal Arts Press. New York. 1955 edition.
17. Kameyama, M. (1999), 'Stressed and unstressed pronouns: Complementary preferences'. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 306-21.
18. Kehler, A. (2002), Coherence, Reference, and the Theory of Grammar CSLI Publications. Stanford, CA.
19. Kehler, A. (2005), 'Coherence-driven constraints on the placement of accent'. In E. Georgala and J. Howell (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT-15). CLC Publications. Cornell University. 98-115.
20. Kertz, L., A. Kehler, & J. L. Elman (2006), 'Grammatical and coherence-based factors in pronoun interpretation'. In R. Sun (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah, NJ. 1605-10.
21. Koornneef, A. W. & J. J. A. van Berkum (2006), 'On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking'. Journal of Memory and Language 54 445-65.
22. Levy, R. (2007), 'Expectation-based syntactic comprehension'. Cognition, forthcoming.
23. McKoon, G., S. B. Greene, & R. Ratcliff (1993), 'Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs'. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 266-83.
24. Miltsakaki, E. (2001), 'Toward an aposynthesis of topic continuity and intrasentential anaphora'. Computational Linguistics 28 319-55.
25. Moens, M. & M. Steedman (1988), 'Temporal ontology and temporal reference'. Computational Linguistics 14:15-28.
26. Oehrle, R. T. (1981), 'Common problems in the theory of anaphora and the theory of discourse'. In H. Parret, M. Sbisà, and J. Verschueren (eds.), Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. John Benjamins. Amsterdam. 509-30. Studies in Language Companion Series, Volume 7.
27. Rohde, H., A. Kehler, & J. L. Elman (2006), 'Event structure and discourse coherence biases in pronoun interpretation'. In R. Sun (ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah, NJ. 617-22.
28. Rudolph, U. & F. Forsterling (1997), 'The psychological causality implicit in verbs: A review'. Psychological Bulletin 121 192-218.
29. Schwarzschild, R. (1999), 'Givenness, AvoidF, and other constraints on the placement of accent'. Natural Language Semantics 7 141-77.
30. Sheldon, A. (1974), 'The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English'. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 272-81.
31. Smyth, R. (1994), 'Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution'. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 23:197-229.
32. Stevenson, R. J., R. A. Crawley, & D. Kleinman (1994), 'Thematic roles, focus, and the representation of events'. Language and Cognitive Processes 9:519-48.
33. Stevenson, R. J., A. Knott, J. Oberlander, & S. McDonald (2000), 'Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles, and coherence relations'. Language and Cognitive Processes 15:225-62.
34. Stewart, A. J., M. J. Pickering, & A. J. Sanford (1998), 'Implicit consequentiality'. In M. A. Gernsbacher and S. J. Derry (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah. NJ. 1031-6.
35. Stewart, A. J., M. J. Pickering, & A. J. Sanford (2000), 'The role of implicit causality in language comprehension: Focus versus integration accounts'. Journal of Memory and Language 42: 423-43.
36. Venditti, J. J., M. Stone, P. Nanda, & P. Tepper (2002), 'Discourse constraints on the interpretation of nuclear-accented pronouns'. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Speech Prosody. ISCA Archive. Aixen-Provence, France. 675-8.
37. Winograd, T. (1972), Understanding Natural Language. Academic Press. New York.
38. Wolf, F., E. Gibson, & T. Desmet (2004), 'Discourse coherence and pronoun interpretation'. Language and Cognitive Processes 19 665-75.
39. Wolters, M. & D. Beaver (2001), 'What does he mean?' In J. D. Moore and K. Stenning (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated. Mahwah, NJ. 1176-80.