Discourse coherence and pronoun resolution

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 665-675

  Wolf, Florian ^a   Gibson, Edward ^a   Desmet, Timothy ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING;

EID: 10944251845     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960444000034     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Akmajian, A., & Jackendoff, R. (1970). Coreferentiality and stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 124-126.
2. Brennan, S. E., Friedman, M. W., & Pollard, C. J. (1987). A Centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of the 25th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 155-162. Stanford, CA.
3. Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 601-609.
4. Chambers, G. C., & Smyth, R. (1998). Structural parallelism and discourse coherence: A test of Centering Theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 593-608.
5. Ehrlich, K. (1980). Comprehension of pronouns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 247-255.
6. Fellbaum, C. (Ed.). (2001). WordNet - An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
8. Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311-347.
9. Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2), 203-225.
10. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
11. Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3, 67-90.
12. Hobbs, J. R., Stickel, M. E., Appelt, D. E., & Martin, P. (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 63, 69-142.
13. Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228-238.
15. Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
16. Kintsch, W., & van Dyke, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
17. Lappin, S., & Leass, H. (1994). An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4), 535-561.
18. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how? Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3/4), 235-262.
19. Smyth, R. H. (1994). Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 197-229.
20. Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2000). The role of implicit causality in language comprehension: Focus versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 423-443.
21. Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press.
22. Wundt, W. (1911). Völkerpsychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann Verlag.