From Standards to Concerted Programs of Collective Action: The Standardization Process of Cell Therapy in France. Pragmatist Contribution to the Sociology of Innovation

Social Theory and Health

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 220-238

  Tournay, Virginie ^a  

^a Laboratoire PACTE   (France)

Author keywords

Cell therapy; Collective action; Pragmatist contribution; Sociology of innovation; Standardization; STS

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749141775     PISSN: 14778211     EISSN: 1477822X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/sth.2008.6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Armstrong D, Caldwell D (2004). Origins of the concept of quality of life in health care: a rhetorical solution to a political problem. Social Theory and Health 2: 361-371
2. Berg M, Mol A (eds) (1998). Differences in Medicine. Unraveling Practices, Techniques and Bodies. Duke University Press: Durham
3. Bonah C (2002). Experimental rage: the development of medical ethics and the genesis of scientific facts. Ludwig Fleck: an answer to the crisis of modern medicine in Interwar Germany? Social History of Medicine 15: 187-207
4. Brock D (1995). Public moral discourse. In: Bulger RE, Bobby EM, Fineberg H (eds). Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, pp 215-240
5. Cambrosio A, Keating P, Schlich T, Weisz G (2006). Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine. Social Sciences & Medicine 63: 189-199
6. Claeys A, Huriet C (1992). Rapport sur l'application de la loi no 94-654 du 29 juillet 1994 relative au don et à l'utilisation des éléments et produits du corps humain, à l0assistance médicale, à la procréation et au diagnostic prénatal, de l0Office parlementaire d0évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques
7. Daly J (2005). Evidence-Based Medicine and the Search for a Science of Clinical Care. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA
8. Dewey J (1991[1927]). The Public and Its Problems. Swallow Press/Ohio University Press: Athens, OH
9. Gaudillière J-P (2002). Inventer la biomédecine: la France, l'Amérique et la production des savoirs du vivant (1945-1965). La Découverte: Paris
10. Hacking I (1992).'Style' for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 23: 1-20
11. Hilgartner S (2004). The constitution of genomic property: co-producing mapping strategies and moral orders in Genome laboratories. In: Jasanoff S (ed). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA
12. Hogle L-F (2000). Réglementer les innovations utilisant des tissus humains. Hybrides et gouvernance. Sciences Sociales et Sant 18: 53-74
13. Howell JD (1995). Technology in the Hospital. Transforming Patient Care in the Early Twentieth Century. The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore
14. Jasanoff S (2004). States of knowledge. In: Jasanoff S (ed). States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Routledge: London
15. Jorland G, Opinel A, Weisz G (2005). Body Counts. Medical Quantification in Historical & Sociological Perspectives. McGill-Queen's University Press: Québec
16. Kelly SE (2003). Public bioethics and publics: consensus, boundaries and participation in biomedical science policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values 28: 339-364
17. Keulartz J, Schermer M, Korthals M, Swierstra T (2004). Ethics in technological culture: a programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Science, Technology, & Human Values 29: 3-29
18. Latour B (1999). Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Harvard University Press: Cambridge
19. Latour B (2005). Reassembling the Social-An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press: Oxford
20. Löwy I (1996). Between Bench and Bedside. Science, Healing, and Interleukin-2 in a Cancer Ward. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA
21. Merryman J, et Perez-Perdomo R (2007). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press: Stanford
22. Mol A (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Duke University Press: Durham
23. Moussaoui S, Lucas S, Zorzi P, Le Saulnier C, Trouvin J-H (2003). Cadre réglementaire de la thérapie cellulaire. Bull Cancer 90: 779-788
24. O'Connell J (1993). Metrology: the creation of universality by the circulation of particulars. Social Studies of Science 23: 129-173
25. Rheinberger H-J (1997). Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Standford University Press: Stanford
26. Shapin S (1994). A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. University of Chicago Press: Chicago
27. Tarde G (2000). Social Laws: An Outline of Sociology. Batoche Books: Kitchener
28. Timmermans S, Berg M (2003). The Gold Standard. The Challenge of Evidence-based Medicine and Standardization in Health Care. Temple University Press: Philadelphia
29. Tournay V (2005a). Produire des biens publics médicaux: Contribution pragmatique à une sociologie de l'action publique. Thèse de Science-Politique, Université de Paris I-Sorbonne
30. Tournay V (2005b). Le biopouvoir à l'épreuve des travaux sur la biomédecine: Succès politique d'un néologisme. Travailler avec Foucault-Retours sur le politique, L'Harmattan
31. Tournay V (2006/2). De la bioéthique à l'action publique en matière de biotechnologies: la production des thérapies cellulaires. Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie 121: 265-286
32. Tournay V (ed) (2007). Comment inscrire durablement les revendications sociales, les pratiques sociales et les récits historiques? La Gouvernance des Innovations Médicales. Presses Universitaires de France: Paris.