Gene profiling for determining pluripotent genes in a time course microarray experiment

Biostatistics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 80-93

  Tuke, J ^a   Glonek, G F V ^a   Solomon, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Gene profiling; Linear model; Microarray; Pluripotency; Stem cell; Time course experiment

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME;

ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LINEAR MODELS; MICE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 57749109291     PISSN: 14654644     EISSN: 14684357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn017     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ADAMS, R. AND BISCHOF, L. (1994). Seeded region growing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 16, 641-647.
2. AHNERT, S. E., WILLBRAND, K., BROWN, F. C. S. AND FINK, T. M. A. (2006). Unbiased pattern detection in microarray data series. Bioinformatics 22, 1471-1476.
3. BAR-JOSEPH, Z., GERBER, G. K., GIFFORD, D. K., JAAKKOLA, T. S. AND SIMON, I. (2003). Continuous representations of time-series gene expression data. Journal of Computational Biology 10, 341-356.
4. BERGER, R. L. (1982). Multiparameter hypothesis testing and acceptance sampling. Technometrics 24, 295-300.
5. BROWN, A. L., WILKINSON, C. R., WATERMAN, S. R., KOK, C. H., SALERNO, D. G., DIAKIW, S. M., REYNOLDS, B., SCOTT, H. S., TSYKIN, A., GLONEK, G. F. and others (2006). Genetic regulators of myelopoiesis and leukemic signaling identified by gene profiling and linear modeling. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 80, 1-15.
6. CELEUX, G., MARTIN, O. AND LAVERGNE, C. (2005). Mixture of linear mixed models for clustering gene expression profiles from repeated microarray experiments. Statistical Modelling 5, 243-267.
7. D'AMOUR, K. A. AND GAGE, F. H. (2003). Genetic and functional differences between multipotent neural and pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 11866-11872.
8. DUDOIT, S., YANG, Y. H., CALLOW, M. J. AND SPEED, T. P. (2002). Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Statistica Sinica 12, 111-139.
9. EISEN, M. B., SPELLMAN, P. T., BROWN, P. O. AND BOTSTEIN, D. (1998). Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 14863-14868.
10. ERNST, J., NAU, G. J. AND BAR- JOSEPH, Z. (2005). Clustering short time series gene expression data. Bioinformatics 21, 159-168.
11. FLEURY, G., HERO, A., YOSHIDA, S., CARTER, T., BARLOW, C. ANDSWAROOP, A. (2002). Pareto analysis for gene filtering in microarray experiments. Proceedings of the 11th European Signal Processing Conference. 3, 165-168.
12. GHOSH, D. AND CHINNAIYAN, A.M. (2002). Mixture modelling of gene expression data from microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 18, 275-286.
13. GLONEK, G. F. AND SOLOMON, P. J. (2004). Factorial and time course designs for cDNA microarray experiments. Biostatistics 5, 89-111.
14. HERO, A. O. AND FLEURY, G. (2004). Pareto-optimal methods for gene ranking. The Journal of VLSI Signal Processing 38, 259-275.
15. LOCKHART, D. J., DONG, H., BYRNE, M. C., FOLLETTIE, M. T., GALLO, M. V., GHEE, M. S., MITTMANN, M., WANG, C., KOBAYASHI, M., HORTON, H. and others (1996). Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nature Biotechnology 14, 1675-1680.
16. LOH, Y.-H., WU, Q., CHEW, J.-L., VEGA, V. B., ZHANG, W., CHEN, X., BOURQUE, G., GEORGE, J., LEONG, B., LIU, J. and others (2006). The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genetics 38, 431-440.
17. LÖNNSTEDT, I., GRANT, S., BEGLEY, G. ANDSPEED, T. P. (2001). Microarray analysis of two interacting treatments: a linear model and trends in expression over time. Technical Report 7/2001. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Mathematics - Uppsala University.
18. MCLACHLAN, G. J., BEAN, R. W. AND JONES, L. B. T. (2006). A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays. Bioinformatics 22, 1608-16.15.
19. NGUYEN, D. V., ARPAT, A. B., WANG, N. Y. AND CARROLL, R. J. (2002). DNA microarray experiments: biological and technological aspects. Biometrics 58, 701-717.
20. NISHIMOTO, M., MLYAGI, S., YAMAGISHI, T., SAKAGUCHI, T., NIWA, H., MURAMATSU, M. AND OKUDA, A. (2005). Oct-3/4 maintains the proliferative embryonic stem cell state via specific binding to a variant octamer sequence in the regulatory region of the UTF1 locus. Molecular and Cellular Biology 25, 5084-5094.
21. RAMALHO-SANTOS, M., YOON, S., MATSUZAKI, Y., MULLIGAN, R. C. AND MELTON, D. A. (2002). "Stemness": transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science 298, 597-600.
22. R DEVELOPMENTCORETEAM(2006). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
23. RODDA, D. J., CHEW, J.-L., LIM, L.-H., LOH, Y.-H., WANG, B., NG, H.-H. AND ROBSON, P. (2005). Transcriptional regulation of Nanog by Oct4 and Sox2. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 24731-24737.
24. SMYTH, G., YANG, Y. AND SPEED, T. (2003). Statistical issues in cDNA microarray data analysis. Methods in Molecular Biology 224, 111-136.
25. SMYTH, G. K. (2005). Limma: Linear Models for Microarray Data. New York: Springer, pp. 397-420.
26. TAI, C. Y. AND SPEED, T. P. (2006). A multivariate empirical Bayes statistic for replicated microarray time course data. Annals of Statistics 34(5), 2387-2412.
27. TAMAYO, P., SLONIM., D., MESIROV, J., ZHU, Q., KITAREEWAN, S., DMITROVSKY, E., LANDER, E. S. ANDGOLUB, T. R. (1999). Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America96, 2907-2912.
28. TAVAZOIE, S., HUGHES, J. D., CAMPBELL, M. J., CHO, R. J. AND CHURCH, G. M. (1999). Systematic determination of genetic network architecture. Nature Genetics 22, 281-285.
29. WANG, J., RAO, S., CHU, J., SHEN, X., LEVASSEUR, D. N., THEUNISSEN, T. W. AND ORKIN, S. H. (2006). A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 444, 364-368.
30. WELLEK, S. (2002). Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
31. YANG, Y., BUCKLEY, M. AND SPEED, T. (2001). Analysis of cDNA microarray images. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2, 341-349.
32. YANG, Y. H. ANDSPEED, T. (2003). Design and analysis of comparative microarray experiments. In: Speed, T. (editor), Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Data. Chap. 2. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall, pp. 35-91.
33. YEUNG, K. Y., FRALEY, C., MURUA, A., RAFTERY, A. E. AND RUZZO, W. L. (2001). Model-based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data. Bioinformatics 17, 977-987.