Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 400-405

  Sahin, Fusun ^a   Yilmaz, Figen ^a   Ozmaden, Asli ^a   Kotevoglu, Nurdan ^a   Sahin, Tulay ^a   Kuran, Banu ^a  

^a SISLI ETFAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Elderly; Extended daily life activities; Outcome measurement; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GERIATRIC DISORDER; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NOTTINGHAM EXTENDED ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); VALIDITY; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 57749092714     PISSN: 15940667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03325144     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
2. Guillemin F. Functional disability and quality of life assessment in clinical practice. Rheumatology 2000; 39: 17-23.
3. Iwarsson S. Environmental influences on the cumulative structure of instrumental ADL: an example in osteoporosis patients in a Swedish rural district. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 221-7.
4. Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 913-23.
5. Turner-Stokes L, Turner-Stokes T. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centers in the UK. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 306-13.
6. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 301-5.
7. Nicholl CR, Lincoln NB, Playford ED. The reliability and validity of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2002; 8: 372-6.
8. Garrod R, Bestall JC, Paul EA, Wedzicha JA, Jones PW. Development and validation of standardized measure of activity of daily living in patients with severe COPD: The London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL). Respir Med 2000; 94: 589-96.
9. O'Mahony MS, Sim MFV, Ho SF, Steward JA, Buchalter M, Burr M. Diastolic heart failure in older people. Age Ageing 2003; 32: 519-24.
10. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. The validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 371-7.
11. Hershkovitz A, Gottlieb D, Beloosesky Y, Brill S. Program evaluation of a geriatric rehabilitation day hospital. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 750-5.
12. Young JB, Robinson M, Chell S, et al. A whole system study of intermediate care services for older people. Age Ageing 2005; 34: 577-83.
13. Fleming SA, Blake A, Gladman JRF, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a care home rehabilitation service to reduce longterm institutionalization for elderly people. Age Ageing 2004; 33: 384-90.
14. Lincoln NB, Gladman JRF. The Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale: further validation. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14: 41-3.
15. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Physical Ther 1986; 66: 1530-9.
16. Kucukdeveci A, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, Suldur B, Sonel B, Arasil T. Adaptation of the Modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000; 32: 87-92.
17. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of the health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1417-32.
18. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186-91.
19. Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, Aaronson N, West K, Bottomley A. EORTC Quality of life Group Translation Procedure, 2002. Web site: http://www.eortc.be/home/qol/Manuals.htm
20. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: theory and applications. Newburry Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1991.
21. Stott DJ, Buttery AK, Bowman A, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment and home-based rehabilitation for elderly people with a history of recurrent non-elective hospital admissions. Age Ageing 2006; 35: 487-91.
22. Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. The reliabflity of stroke outcomes. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7: 290-6.
23. Towle D. Use of the "Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale" with depressed stroke patients. Int Disabil Stud 1998; 10: 148-9.
24. Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Chen MH, Jush SD, Hsieh CL. Evaluation of stroke patients with the Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in Taiwan. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 495-500.
25. Gladman JRF, Lincoln NB, Adams S. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients activities of daily living. Age Ageing 1993; 22: 419-24.
26. Schlote A, Kruger J, Topp H, Wallesh CW. Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel Index, the Activity Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: The use of ADL instruments in stroke rehabilitation by medical and non-medical personnel. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2004; 43: 74-82.
27. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. A comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily living Scale, London Handicap Scale and SF-36. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 786-93.
28. Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. Validity of the Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Clin Rehabil 1994; 8: 275-80.