Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel Index, the Activity Index, and the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: The use of ADL instruments in stroke rehabilitation by medical and non medical personnel;Inter-rater-reliabilität des Barthel-Index, Activity-Index und Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living: Die anwendung von ADL-instrumenten in der schlaganfallrehabilitation durch mediziner und nichtmediziner

Rehabilitation

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 75-82

  Schlote, Andrea ^a,d   Kruger J ^b   Topp, H ^a,c   Wallesch, C W ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Zentrum fur Med Rehabilitation   (Germany)

^c Klinik Leezen am Schweriner See   (Germany)

^d INNRF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Activity index; Barthel Index; Inter rater reliability; Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY INDEX; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CALCULATION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORMAL HUMAN; NOTTINGHAM EXTENDED ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING SCALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICIAN; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SATISFACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICIANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPORTS MEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2442687936     PISSN: 00343536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-814898     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, verfügbar unter URL: www.medizinfo.de/schlaganfall/epi1998, 1998
2. Frommelt P. Schlaganfallrehabilitation. In: Frommelt P, Grötzbach H (Hrsg). Neurorehabilitation. Grundlagen Praxis Dokumentation. Berlin, Wien: Blackwell, 1999
3. Rößler A, Schettler E, Welter FL. Physiotherapie. In: Welter FL, Schönle PW (Hrsg). Neurologische Rehabilitation. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, 1997
4. Brott T, Adams JP, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran P, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M, Moomaw CJ, Walker M. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870
5. Adams RJ, Meador KJ, Sethi KD, Grotta JC, Thomson DS. Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. Stroke 1987; 18: 665-669
6. Hamrin E, Wohlin Al. Evaluation of the functional capacity of stroke patients through an activity index. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982; 14: 93-100
7. Nouri FM, Lincoln NB. An Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale for stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 1987; 1: 301-305
8. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Rehabilitation. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965, April; 21, 22, 23: 61-65
9. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An Activities Index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1983; 12: 166-170
10. Adamek-Münz W. Ergotherapie. In: Welter FL, Schönle PW (Hrsg). Neurologische Rehabilitation. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, 1997
11. Harwood RH, Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. Determinants of handicap 1 and 3 years after a stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19 (5): 205-211
12. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Philips S, Ring H, Tesio L, Thonnard JL. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 273-278
13. Bölsche F, Hasenbein U, Reissberg H, Lotz-Rambaldi W, Wallesch CW. Kurzfristige Ergebnisse ambulanter vs. stationärer Phase-D-Rehabilitation nach Schlaganfall. Rehabilitation 2002; 41 (2-3): 175-182
14. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 133-143
15. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke - A critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479-489
16. Pettersen R, Dahl T, Wyller TB. Prediction of long-term functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 149-159
17. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61-63
18. Richards SH, Peters TJ, Coast J, Gunnell DJ, Darlow M-A, Pounsford J. Inter-rater-reliability of the Barthel-ADL-Index: How does a researcher compare to a nurse? Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 72-78
19. Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Barthel Index information elicited over the telephone: Is it reliable? AJ Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74 (1): 9-18
20. Edwards M, Feightner J, Goldsmith CH. Inter-rater reliability of assessments administered by individuals with and without a background in health care. Occ Ther J Research 1995; 15 (2): 103-110
21. Bundesanstalt für Arbeit. Informationen für die Beratungs- und Vermittlungsdienste. Jahresbericht des Arbeitsmarkt-Informationsservice der Zentralstelle für Arbeitsvermittlung. Bonn: Zentralstelle für Arbeitsvermittlung, 2002
22. Meyer zu Schwabedissen H, Nemitz G, Harms A, Saint-Mount U, Krauth J. Untersuchung zur Reliabilität des Geriatrischen Basisassessments. Z Gerontol Geriat 2000; 33: 1-8
23. Nikolaus T. Das geriatrische Assessment. Z Gerontol Geriat 2001; 34 (Suppl 1): I/36-I/42
24. Maidhof R, Schneider F, Rachold U, Gerber J, Niehoff JU, Sann J. Der Barthel-Index: Eine Alternative zum Begutachtungsverfahren in der Pflegeversicherung? Gesundheitswesen 2002; 64: 54-59
25. Schönle PW. Frühe Phasen der Neurologischen Rehabilitation: Differentielle Schweregradbeurteilung bei Patienten in der Phase B (Frührehabilitation) und in der Phase C (Frü hmobilisation/Postprimäre Rehabilitation) mithilfe des Frü hreha-Barthel-Index (FRB). Neurol Rehabil 1996; 1: 21-25
26. Masur H. Skalen und Scores in der Neurologie. 2. überarb. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2000
27. Ranhoff AH, Laake K. The Barthel ADL Index: Scoring by the physician from patient interview is not reliable. Age Ageing 1993; 22: 171-174
28. Shinar D, Gross CR, Bronstein KS, Licata-Gehr EE, Eden DT, Cabrera AR, Fishman IG, Barwick JA, Kunitz SC. Reliability of the Activities of Daily Living Scale and its use in telephone interview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 723-728
29. Putten JJ Van der, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66: 480-484
30. Gauggel S, Lammler G, Borchelt M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Bocker M, Heinemann A. Beurteilungsübereinstimmung beim Barthel-Index. Eine Rasch-Analyse der Fremd- und Selbstbeurteilung älterer Schlaganfall-Patienten. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2002; 5 (2): 102-110
31. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: Measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177-183
32. Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2001; 100: 526-532
33. Hamrin E II. Early activation in stroke: Does it make a difference? Scand J Rehabil Med 1982; 14: 101-109
34. Hamrin E III. One year after stroke: A follow-up of an experimental study. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982; 14: 111-116
35. Lindmark B. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke with special emphasis on motor function and activities of daily living. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1988: 211-240
36. Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Chen MH, Jush SD, Hsieh CL. Evaluation of stroke patients with the Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in Taiwan. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22 (11): 495-500
37. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. A Comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale, London Handicap Scale and SF-36. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22 (17): 786-793
38. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S. The validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24 (7): 371-377
39. Nicholl CR, Lincoln NB, Playford ED. The reliability and validity of the Nottingham Extended ADL in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis 2002; 8: 372-376
40. Gladman JRF, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the Extended ADL Scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing 1993; 22: 419-424
41. Lincoln NB, Gladman JRF. The Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale: A further validation. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14 (1): 41-43
42. Gompertz P, Pound P, Ebrahim S. The reliability of stroke outcome measures. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7: 290-296
43. Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23 (15): 670-676
44. Wirtz M, Caspar F. Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2002