Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 133-136

  Srinivasan, Narasimhan ^a   Kavitha, Mahendran ^a   Loganathan, Chandarasekaran S ^a   Padmini, Govindasamy ^a  

^a Tamil Nadu Government Dental College and Hospital   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICAINE; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEEK; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULPITIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; BICUSPID; CARTICAINE; CHEEK; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; HUMANS; LIDOCAINE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULPITIS; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 57649245625     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Malamed S.F., Gagnon S., and Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 32 (2001) 177-185
2. Gouws P., Galloway P., Jacob J., English W., and Allman K.G. Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in cataract extraction. Br J Anaesth 92 (2004) 228-230
3. Isen D.A. Articaine: pharmacology and clinical use of a recently approved local anesthetic. Dent Today 19 (2000) 72-77
4. Claffey E., Reader A., Nusstein J., Beck M., and Weaver J. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 30 (2004) 568-571
5. Berlin J., Nusstein J., Reader A., Beck M., and Weaver J. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99 (2005) 361-366
6. Rosenberg P.A., Amin K.G., Zibari Y., and Lin L.M. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic. J Endod 33 (2007) 403-405
7. Oliveira P.C., Volpato M.C., Ramacciato J.C., and Ranali J. Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: a pilot study. Br Dent J 197 (2004) 45-46
8. Haas D.A., Harper D.G., Saso M.A., and Young E.R. Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches. Anesth Prog 37 (1990) 230-237
9. Haas D.A., Harper D.G., Saso M.A., and Young E.R. Lack of differential effect by Ultracaine (articaine) and Citanest (prilocaine) in infiltration anesthesia. J Can Dent Assoc 57 3 (1991) 217-223
10. Sherman M.G., Flax M., Namerow K., and Murray P.E. Anesthetic efficacy of the gow-gates injection and maxillary infiltration with articaine and lidocaine for irreversible pulpitis. J Endod 34 (2008) 656-659
11. Costa C.G., Tortamano I.P., Rocha R.G., Francischone C.E., and Toramano N. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration. Quintessence Int 36 (2005) 197-201
12. Kanaa M.D., Whitworth J.M., Corbett I.P., and Meechan J.G. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind crossover study. J Endod 32 (2006) 296-298
13. Robertson D., Nusstein J., Reader A., Beck M., and McCartney M. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 138 (2007) 1104-1112
14. Corbett I.P., Kanaa M.D., Whitworth J.M., and Meechan J.G. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod 34 (2008) 514-518
15. Jung I.Y., Kim J.H., Kim E.S., Lee C.Y., and Lee S.J. An Evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars. J Endod 34 (2008) 11-13
16. Evans G., Nusstein J., Drum M., Reader A.L., and Beck M. A Prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations. J Endod 34 (2008) 389-393
17. Oertel R., Rahn R., and Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet 33 (1997) 417-425
18. Raymond S.A., Steffensen S.C., Gugino L.D., and Strichartz G.R. The role of length of nerve exposed to local anesthetics in impulse blocking action. Anesth Analg 68 (1989) 563-570
19. Oertel R., Richter K., Weile K., Gramatte T., Berndt A., and Feller K. A simple method for the determination of articaine and its metabolite articainic acid in dentistry: application to a comparison of articaine and lidocaine concentrations in alveolus blood. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 15 8 (1993) 541-547
20. Potocnik I., Tomsic M., Sketelj J., and Bajrovic F.F. Articaine is more effective than lidocaine or mepivacaine in rat sensory nerve conduction block in vitro. J Dent Res 85 2 (2006) 162-166
21. Borchard U., and Drouin H. Carticaine: action of the local anesthetic on myelinated nerve fibres. Eur J Pharmacol 62 (1980) 73-79