Does space matter?: Travel mode scripts in daily activity travel

Environment and Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 75-100

  Hannes, Els ^a   Janssens, Davy ^a   Wets, Geert ^a  

^a HASSELT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Activity based modeling; Choice heuristics; Mental map; Spatial cognition

Indexed keywords

HEURISTICS; MAP; MODELING; SPATIAL COGNITION; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 57649244925     PISSN: 00139165     EISSN: 1552390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013916507311033     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arentze, T.A., Hofman, F., Kalfs, N., & Timmermans, H.J.P. (1997). Data needs, data collection, and data quality requirements of activity-based transport models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transport Survey Quality and Innovation (Transport Surveys: Riding the Standard) (Vol. II-J, pp. 1-35), Grainau, Germany.
2. Arentze, T.A., & Timmermans, H.J.P. (2000). Albatross: A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system. Eindhoven, The Netherlands: European Institute of Retailing and Services Studies.
3. Arentze, T.A., & Timmermans, H.J.P. (2003). Representing mental maps and cognitive learning in micro-simulation models of activity-travel choice dynamics. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research. Moving through nets: The physical and social dimensions of travel (24 pp.). Lucerne, Switzerland.
4. Arentze, T.A., Timmermans, H.J.P., Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2006, May). Modelling short-term dynamics in activity-travel patterns: From AURORA to FEATHERS. Paper presented at the Innovations in Travel Modelling Conference, Austin, TX.
5. Badoe, D.A., & Miller, E.J. (2000). Transportation-land-use interaction: Empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modelling. Transportation Research Part D, 5, 235-263.
6. Bhat, C.R., & Lawton, T.K. (2000). Passenger travel demand forecasting. In Transportation in the new millennium: State of the art and future directions, perspectives from Transportation Research Board Standing Committees [CD-Rom]. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
7. Boarnet, M., & Crane, R. (2001). Travel by design: The influence of urban form on travel. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Bradley, M.A., & Bowman, J.L. (2006, May). A summary of design features of activity-based microsimulation models for U.S. MPOs. White paper presented at the TRB Conference on Innovations in Travel Demand Modeling, Austin, TX.
9. Buliung, R.N. (2005). Activity/travel behaviour research: Approaches and findings with identification of research themes and emerging methods (CSpA WP 008). Hamilton, Canada: Centre for Spatial Analysis.
10. Cervero, R. (2004, September/October). Transit oriented development in America: Contemporary practices, impacts and policy directions. Paper presented at the International Planning Symposium on Incentives, Regulations and Plans: The Role of States and Nation-States in Smarth Growth Planning. Annapolis, MD.
11. Cordon, A., & Sainsbury, R. (2006). Using verbatim quotations in reporting qualitative social research: Researchers' view. York, UK: University of York, Social Policy Research Unit.
12. Enaux, C., & Ramadier, T. (2007, March). Eclairer la mobilité quotidienne par des dimensions qualitatives: Exemple d'une collaboration géographie/psychologie [Explaining daily mobility by qualitative dimensions: Example of a geographic/psychologic collaboration]. Paper presented at the Colloque MSFS-Approches quantitatives et qualitatives des mobilités: Quelles complémentarités ? Namur, Belgium.
13. FOD Economie-Algemene Directie Statistiek. (2007). Retrieved February 11, 2007, from http://statbel.fgov.be/figures/d37_nl.asp.
14. Gärling, T., & Axhausen, K. (2003). Habitual travel choice. Transportation, 30, 1-11.
15. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
16. Golledge, R.G., & Gärling, T. (2003). Spatial behaviour in transportation modelling and planning. In K. Goulias (Ed.), Transportation systems planning: Methods and applications (pp. 1-27). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
17. Golledge, R.G., & Gärling, T. (2004). Cognitive maps and urban travel. In D. A. Hensher, K. J. Button, K. J. Haynes, & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems (Vol. 5, pp. 501-512). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
18. Golledge, R.G., & Timmermans, H.J.P. (1990). Applications of behavioural research on spatial problems. I: Cognition. Progress in Human Geography, 42, 57-99.
19. Hannes, E., Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2006). Proximity is a state of mind. Exploring mental maps in daily travel behaviour. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research [CD-Rom], Kyoto, Japan.
20. Hannes, E., & Wets, G. (2005). Proximity is a state of mind. The role of 'spatial cognition' in travel choice behaviour: An explorative qualitative survey. In De Belgische Geografendag. Mobiliteit, Maatschappij en Milieu in Kaart Gebracht (pp. 119-125). Gent, Belgium: Universiteit Gent.
21. Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2005). The presentation of an activity-based approach for surveying and modelling travel behaviour. In Proceedings of the 32nd Colloquium Vervooersplanologisch Speurwerk: Duurzame mobiliteit, "Hot or Not?" (pp. 1935-1954), Antwerp, Belgium.
22. Kelle, U. (1997). Theory building in qualitative research and computer programs for the management of textual data. Sociological Research Online, 2 (2).
23. Krizek, K., & Levinson, D. (2005). Teaching integrated land use-transportation planning: Topics, readings, and strategies. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 304-316.
24. Maso, I., & Smaling, A. (1998). Kwalitatief onderzoek: Praktijk en theorie [Qualitative research in practice and theory]. Amsterdam: Boom.
25. McCray, T.M., Lee-Gosselin, M.E.H., & Kwan, M.P. (2005). Measuring activity and action space/time: Are our methods keeping pace with evolving behaviour patterns? In M. E. H. Lee-Gosselin & S. T. Doherty (Eds.), Integrated land-use and transportation models: Behavioural foundations (pp. 87 - 100). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
26. Mehndiratta, S.R., Picado, R., & Venter, C. (2003). A qualitative survey technique to explore decision making behaviour in new contexts. In P. Stopher & P. Jones (Eds.), Transport survey quality and innovation (pp. 303-317). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
27. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
28. Mondschein, A., Blumenberg, E., & Taylor, B.D. (2006). Cognitive mapping, travel behaviour, and access to opportunity. In Proceedings of the 85th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board [CD-Rom], Washington, DC.
29. Roorda, M.J., Lee-Gosselin, M.E.H., Doherty, S.T., Miller, E.J., & Rondier, P. (2005). Travel/activity panel surveys in the Toronto and Quebec city regions: Comparison of methods and preliminary results. In Proceedings of the PROCESSUS second international colloquium on the Behavioural Foundations of Integrated Land-use and Transportation Models: Frameworks, Models and Applications [CD-Rom], Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
30. Salvini, P., & Miller, E.J. (2005). ILUTE: An operational prototype of a comprehensive microsimulation model of urban systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, 5, 217-234.
31. Schleiffer, R. (2002). Guest editorial: Intelligent agents in traffic and transportation. Transportation Research Part C, 10, 325-329.
32. Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
33. Sivakumar, A., & Bhat, C. (2006, September). A comprehensive, unified, framework for analyzing spatial location choice. Paper presented at the Association for European Transport and Contributors, Strasbourg, France.
34. Stead, D., & Marshall, S. (2001). The relationship between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1, 113-141.
35. Timmermans, H.J.P., van der Waerden, P., Alves, M., Polak, J., Ellis, S., Harvey, A.S., et al. (2003). Spatial context and the complexity of daily travel patterns: An international comparison. Journal of Transport Geography, 11, 37-46.
36. Trost, J. (1986). Statistically non representative stratified sampling: A sampling technique for qualitative studies. Qualitative Sociology, 9, 54-57.
37. Van Someren, M.W., Barnard, Y.F., & Sandberg, J.A.C. (1994). The think aloud method. A practical guide to model cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
38. Vause, M. (1997). A rule-based model of activity scheduling behaviour. In D. F. Ettema & H. J. P. Timmermans (Eds.), Activity-based approaches to travel-analysis (pp. 73-88). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
39. Weston, L., & Handy, S. (2004). Mental maps. In D. A. Hensher, K. J. Button, K. J. Haynes, & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), Handbook of transport geography and spatial systems (Vol. 5, pp. 533-545). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
40. World Carfree Network. (2007). Retrieved May 24, 2007, from http://www.worldcarfree.net.
41. Zhang, L., & Levinson, D. (2004). An agent-based approach to travel demand modelling: An exploratory analysis. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1898, 28-36.